ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs This years QB needy teams (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=264737)

acesn8s 10-06-2012 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8984207)
Dude.

6th and 7th rounders don't count.

Not behind that that o-line. They are as bad the Chiefs o-line.

BigMeatballDave 10-06-2012 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 8984201)
Right now I see 3 teams that will definitely be QB shopping: Kansas City, Buffalo and Arizona

.

I don't think Arizona will definitely be looking to dratfing a QB.

If they are, so what?

They're 4-1 and not in our way.

DaneMcCloud 10-06-2012 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acesn8s (Post 8984210)
Not behind that that o-line. They are as bad the Chiefs o-line.

LMAO

Arizona would never pass on Geno Smith because they spent a 6th rounder on Ryan Lindley the year before.

Are you smoking crack?

O.city 10-06-2012 11:02 PM

I don't think it's a stretch to say we are probably the worst team in the NFL right now.

acesn8s 10-06-2012 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8984214)
LMAO

Arizona would never pass on Geno Smith because they spent a 6th rounder on Ryan Lindley the year before.

Are you smoking crack?

No. Why? You got some?

BryanBusby 10-06-2012 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8984213)
I don't think Arizona will definitely be looking to dratfing a QB.

If they are, so what?

They're 4-1 and not in our way.

Arizona will be QB shopping, but yeah they aren't relevant right now in dis race.

AussieChiefsFan 10-06-2012 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8984218)
I don't think it's a stretch to say we are probably the worst team in the NFL right now.

At QB

Hoover 10-06-2012 11:04 PM

I'm down with sucking this year, I really am. Time to flush the Cassel turd.

Unsmooth-Moment 10-06-2012 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8984218)
I don't think it's a stretch to say we are probably the worst team in the NFL right now.

We said that last year. We will win some bullshit games that will put us around the 7 to 10 range in the draft. I do hope for a complete collapse though.

O.city 10-06-2012 11:07 PM

We have the 4 ranked Run blocking oline and the 5 ranked pass blocking oline. We have a top 5 RB, a top 10 WR, with another big strong WR starting to show a little something.

Two top 10 pass rushers, one maybe even a top 4 guy. A MLB who has the potential to be one of the best in the league, and alot of potential in the secondary.


Someone wanna tell me coaching and QB play aren't the most important things in the NFL ?

AussieChiefsFan 10-06-2012 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8984241)
We have the 4 ranked Run blocking oline and the 5 ranked pass blocking oline. We have a top 5 RB, a top 10 WR, with another big strong WR starting to show a little something.

Two top 10 pass rushers, one maybe even a top 4 guy. A MLB who has the potential to be one of the best in the league, and alot of potential in the secondary.


Someone wanna tell me coaching and QB play aren't the most important things in the NFL ?

Exactly. It's painful, but exciting at the same time. IMagine what we can do with a great QB

acesn8s 10-06-2012 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 8984245)
Exactly. It's painful, but exciting at the same time. IMagine what we can do with a great QB

The same thing we do every year, Pinky, suck ass.

Sorter 10-06-2012 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 8984201)
. They also run a ****ing reeruned offensive scheme. It's hard to read what the Browns would do

I don't understand...the Browns literally run the same scheme, down to exact terminology as GB. Why is exactly is the scheme reeruned? I'm not a WC guy myself, but reeruned seems a bit strong/ignorant, IMO.


Not having personnel to run scheme doesnt = bad scheme. Especially one as well known and as popular as Holmgren's WC offense.

BryanBusby 10-07-2012 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 8984327)
I don't understand...the Browns literally run the same scheme, down to exact terminology as GB. Why is exactly is the scheme reeruned? I'm not a WC guy myself, but reeruned seems a bit strong/ignorant, IMO.


Not having personnel to run scheme doesnt = bad scheme. Especially one as well known and as popular as Holmgren's WC offense.

They don't. The difference between the Packers and Browns is the Packers don't run a WCO that was lifted directly out of 1985.

BigMeatballDave 10-07-2012 01:36 AM

If Cleveland had a WR worth a shit, they wouldn't be so bad.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.