ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 28 12 3 456713 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Russ Lande says Chiefs should "stick to their board" (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=266243)

Pasta Little Brioni 11-06-2012 08:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 9089703)
When will people like you realize players like Luck are very, very rare? The last QB is his category was Peyton. The other 31 teams have to settle for less than someone like that. Just because a QB isn't on the same level as Luck does not mean he is not a good if not great QB.
Yeah, that's what I was talking about earlier. They compare everyone to the once in a decade prospects and think trading down and snagging some slapdick in the 5th is just as good.

Rasputin 11-06-2012 08:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants (Post 9089652)
Take the best player on the board with the first pick. Then use the third or trade aplayer to get back into the first and take a QB. That would be the smart thing to do imo.

It is November and look at how these QBs are being talked about. Their stock will only go down guys. The damage is done.
Their stock is only going to go up they are quarterbacks. Quarterbacks are prestige they are the guys that make or break a football program. RGIII stock was down this time of year then his stock sky rocketed before the draft. These guys stock is going to fluctuate up untill the draft then teams are going be players and make their stock go up just for their position and value. Not worried about their stock at the moment they still got games to play and the combine yet.

htismaqe 11-06-2012 08:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9089678)
Worked great for Cleveland trying that twice!!!
Brady Quinn and Brandon Weeden?

They're awesome!

Woodchuck 11-06-2012 08:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9089678)
Worked great for Cleveland trying that twice!!!
I would agree that it did. I think they learned from the Tim Couch debacle. They reached big time for him.

In 2007, do you think they should have taken Brady Quinn at #3 over Joe Thomas? I mean they got Brady Quinn at #22 and the only QB taken before him was Jamarcus Russell. Should they have moved up to #1 and drafted Russell?

Last year they got Trent Richardson who might be the best player in that class. They waited around and got Weedan later in the first. Is he that much different than Tannehill? He was also a choker in college and wasn't "clutch." They took a calculated gamble taking Weedan where they did and it wasn't nearly the gamble Miami made. Tannehill's success lies with Sherman imo. Next year, Tannehill is going to suck when teams have tape on that offense.

In the end, one could argue that Cleveland's best two players came from making smart decisions in the draft.

You are ****ing idiot.

RealSNR 11-06-2012 08:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants (Post 9089669)
Tannehill had the same knock all these guys have. He shit the bed when the game is on the line. He didn't have "it" and he wasn't "clutch." We saw that last Sunday. Could you see the real difference between him and Luck? **** the stats guys.

It's not just about accuracy and the other crap. They are never going to win anything with Tannehill imo. We better find the "clutch" QB in this class or we are spinning our wheels. It's more important than anything in today's game. Far too many games come down to the end and it happens more often than not in the playoffs.
Clutch.

Like Jay Cutler.

notorious 11-06-2012 08:11 AM
Clark needs to put Pioli's head through the ****ing board.

htismaqe 11-06-2012 08:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 9089703)
When will people like you realize players like Luck are very, very rare? The last QB is his category was Peyton. The other 31 teams have to settle for less than someone like that. Just because a QB isn't on the same level as Luck does not mean he is not a good if not great QB.
Manning won ONE game his rookie season.

I'm sure Bob would have been telling us all that he's not clutch.

Reerun_KC 11-06-2012 08:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants (Post 9089713)
I would agree that it did. I think they learned from the Tim Couch debacle. They reached big time for him.

In 2007, do you think they should have taken Brady Quinn at #3 over Joe Thomas? I mean they got Brady Quinn at #22 and the only QB taken before him was Jamarcus Russell. Should they have moved up to #1 and drafted Russell?

Last year they got Trent Richardson who might be the best player in that class. They waited around and got Weedan later in the first. Is he that much different than Tannehill? He was also a choker in college and wasn't "clutch." They took a calculated gamble taking Weedan where they did and it wasn't nearly the gamble Miami made.

In the end, one could argue that Cleveland's best two players came from making smart decisions in the draft.
Yet we havent made a "SMART" decision in the draft in over 25 years...

Someday we will grow up and become an NFL team...

htismaqe 11-06-2012 08:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants (Post 9089713)
In the end, one could argue that Cleveland's best two players came from making smart decisions in the draft.
ROFL

That's why we're competing with them for the #1 pick in the draft.

ROFL

RealSNR 11-06-2012 08:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants (Post 9089669)
Tannehill had the same knock all these guys have. He shit the bed when the game is on the line. He didn't have "it" and he wasn't "clutch." We saw that last Sunday. Could you see the real difference between him and Luck? **** the stats guys.

It's not just about accuracy and the other crap. They are never going to win anything with Tannehill imo. We better find the "clutch" QB in this class or we are spinning our wheels. It's more important than anything in today's game. Far too many games come down to the end and it happens more often than not in the playoffs.
If clutch is the only thing that matters, we should work out a package to acquire Tim Tebow, yeah?

Right?

htismaqe 11-06-2012 08:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9089715)
Clutch.

Like Jay Cutler.
The players and fans LOVE him.

He gets a bad rap because of the media.

Reerun_KC 11-06-2012 08:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9089719)
Manning won ONE game his rookie season.

I'm sure Bob would have been telling us all that he's not clutch.
Is this guy blackbob? Woodsuck swallowpants?

KC_Lee 11-06-2012 08:14 AM
Perhaps we should wait to see who the coach is for next season and what type of offense his OC wants to run and then choose the QB we will take in the 1st round?

Just saying...

Pasta Little Brioni 11-06-2012 08:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9089716)
Clark needs to put Pioli's head through the ****ing board.
Heh, he may have it in a glass cage "Walking Dead style" like the Gov. after this season ROFL

htismaqe 11-06-2012 08:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 9089728)
Is this guy blackbob? Woodsuck swallowpants?
You couldn't tell?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:47 PM.
Page 3 of 28 12 3 456713 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.