![]() |
Quote:
No thanks. Time to get the highest rated guy. Have you seen the stats on SB winning QBs taken in the 1st vs everywhere else? |
In 13 years as a head coach, Tony Dungy has drafted 3 QBs:
2004 6th Jim Sorgi 2000 7th Joe Hamilton 1999 2nd Shaun King When it comes to drafting a QB, Tony Dungy should STFU. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
When you have Peyton Manning you dont really need to address that position in the draft.
|
Quote:
If he declares he'll be a first round pick. I would rather have Geno or Tyler Wilson but if we draft him I won't be upset, he has the tools and the height thing is way over-rated... Either you can make the throws or you can't, and we've seen a lot of the latter |
Dungy reminds me of a little better Herm. And his opinion has slightly more weight than Nick Athan. None.
|
Quote:
I think the biggest reason shorter QB's rarely succeed, and purely my opinion, is the prejudice against them. They're drafted low and even if they start they're given a short leash and basically expected to fail. The Drew Brees argument is obviously tired, but I don't know of a lot of other QB's who are under 6-2 that were given a legit opportunity to succeed. Wilson got a legit shot and he's done pretty well with it as a rookie. The sample size has been kept pretty small. I mean I don't think 5-9 linebackers are ideal, but if a guy can play, he can play. Not really about Murray though. I like Geno better. |
The guy has an arm and a great, quick release.
FAX |
Quote:
|
Just saw Palmer on Espn ... He says that statistically, Aaron Murray has been the most efficient QB in college football this year.
:shrug: i'm not pushing for Murray ... just repeating what i hear. |
Quote:
I know he has a good history and can make most throws. I'm not saying he's Greg McElroy. I would have liked to see him flash more this season, that's all. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Probably not worthy of the #1 pick but I would have him right behind Wilson. 1. Geno 2. Wilson 3. Murray 4. Nassib 5. Bray/ Barkley |
Quote:
Here's what Murray did against the two ranked teams they've played: @ South Carolina 11-31 (35.5%) 109yds 0 TD 1 INT 58.6 Rating vs. Florida 12-24 (50%) 150yds 1 TD 3 INT 91.3 Rating In all other games combined: 190-265 (71.7%) 29 TD 3 INT 202.1 Rating |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.