![]() |
Even if kelce comes back and wrecks shit, who cares?
People act as if you can't have multiple good/great players at the same position. If some player has elite upside when you pick, seems pretty easy to me |
Thing with wr is, what's the difference in say Beckham ( who I love) and Josh Huff? If they like Jenkins like they're saying, seems wr isn't of high priority
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And at the same time, Kelce lives up to the Gronk comparisons. Who here WOULDN'T want Davis AND Gronk on the same team, with ALEX SMITH at QB? Please raise your hand if you're against this so that OldSchool can come around and slap you up the side of your ****ing head. |
It's the same reason i wouldn't be terribly upset with a 1 year prove it deal with what's his face from GB that ****ed up his neck (if they don't want to draft a te)
|
Quote:
Don't draft X because we have Y. There are a ton of ways to get everyone on the field at once. Be creative. |
Quote:
|
He's essentially have to be a big wr who plays some te
|
Quote:
|
In this scenario Beckham. Give Kelce at least a year before you draft another te.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
when Dexter McCluster was Wes Welker and Tyson Jackson was Richard Seymour and Glenn Dorsey was Warren Sapp and Jon Baldwin was Vincent Jackson. I remember that team. |
Ebron will never fall that far. If he does, we should take him.
|
Quote:
It was a hypothetical. I don't have much faith that Kelce will ever be Gronk. But Eric Ebron has a chance to be special. There's nothing "homer" about it. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.