ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals *** Official Kansas City Royals @ San Francisco Giants World Series Game 5 Thread *** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=287813)

Sure-Oz 10-26-2014 01:49 AM

This game will def define Shields legacy in kc....def has not looked good in the playoffs

Why Not? 10-26-2014 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 11053176)
This game will def define Shields legacy in kc....def has not looked good in the playoffs

This. Will James Shields go down as a pretty good player who helped turn the culture and gave us all a neat October or will he become a ****ing legend in this city for ever more?

milkman 10-26-2014 06:51 AM

I have no idea why anyone thinks that Aoki should start.

He's a defensive liability, and he has been a liability at the plate.

Unsmooth-Moment 10-26-2014 07:06 AM

Wouldn't be surprised if we lose today and win Tuesday.. Game 7 in KC would be insane.

Why Not? 10-26-2014 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 11053206)
I have no idea why anyone thinks that Aoki should start.

He's a defensive liability, and he has been a liability at the plate.

I am puzzled by this as well. Dyson has hits in both games and has played good D. Not to mention, Cain has been stellar in RF. Sure, Aoki hits lefties better but there is no way you can put him in that RF.

Hootie 10-26-2014 07:13 AM

In.

Terrible feeling, I have.

But in either way.

****.

farmerchief 10-26-2014 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 11053221)
I am puzzled by this as well. Dyson has hits in both games and has played good D. Not to mention, Cain has been stellar in RF. Sure, Aoki hits lefties better but there is no way you can put him in that RF.

One thing I dont understand, what has happened to our running game????Dyson had opportunity to try and steal last night, and never went? Is Yost getting conservative, or are their pitchers and catcher that tough to steal on???

milkman 10-26-2014 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by farmerchief (Post 11053257)
One thing I dont understand, what has happened to our running game????Dyson had opportunity to try and steal last night, and never went? Is Yost getting conservative, or are their pitchers and catcher that tough to steal on???

I think it's tk13 that lays it out pretty well in the game 4 thread, but the pitcher did a great job of holding the runner.

I thought, however, that Aoki should have been bunting.

BigMeatballDave 10-26-2014 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 11053261)

I thought, however, that Aoki should have been bunting.

Absolutely, this.

****ing Yost.

Hootie 10-26-2014 07:44 AM

No. He should have taken a strike. And Dyson should have been stealing before Aoki got 2 strikes.

That was awful.

CaliforniaChief 10-26-2014 07:46 AM

Yeah, the decision on starting Aoki or Dyson is a tough one for me.

On one hand, you're already playing with a dead spot in the lineup at 9, so putting Dyson in at 8 against a LHP essentially gives you two dead spots.

Then again, the Giants put the ball in play, and have hit a ton of tough balls to RF. I have zero confidence in Aoki playing RF.

Add to that Aoki's recent woes at the plate, and I think I lean towards Dyson.

Let me add that if you go to Aoki, I bat him 8th and let Gordon stay 2nd.

CaliforniaChief 10-26-2014 07:47 AM

He should have either bunted or Dyson should have stolen. The steal was preferable (Petit gave up 15/18 SB's), but the bunt was the next right play.

There's no way a swing without a steal was a good idea.

Hootie 10-26-2014 07:48 AM

he should have taken 2nd and then Aoki should have bunted

AussieChiefsFan 10-26-2014 08:22 AM

In for the win. They get this one, its over IMO.

007 10-26-2014 08:23 AM

In but I sure don't have any positive feeling going into this game. Kind of a Chiefs feeling really.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.