ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 14 12 3 456713 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football 538 Calls Tom Brady the 43rd Clutchest Postseason QB (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=289920)

notorious 01-13-2015 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11267076)

But neither of them have been great by any standard.
Holy shit, I am going to faint.


Hootie just said Manning hasn't been great. This is progress, people.

Hootie 01-13-2015 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 11267073)
so, in an imaginary world....


in the real world, Brady trumps Manning in every category

end of story
so when a replacement level is supposed to go 13-13 on Brady's teams ...

you're surprised that he's won most of those games?

Must be nice to only need a replacement level guy to go 13 - 13.

Sure Manning would have won more games if his replacement level wasn't 8 - 16.

MagicHef 01-13-2015 12:27 PM
You're looking at the first chart, where the second one, down the page, is where he runs the numbers with a replacement-level QB, which is what the text you quoted is talking about.

In this chart, Brady ranks 6th, behind Eli, Montana, Warner, Flacco, and Elway.

SAUTO 01-13-2015 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11267070)
Nope.

Read my last post.

Just said the same thing.

Tom has been 1.2 wins better than his ELO predictions and Peyton has been 2.2 wins worse than his.

This is more or less proof that debunks the idea that Tom Brady doesn't have any weapons.

He's had the weapon of having the best team in football for about 1.5 decades now. Not to mention his head coach...
how is some guy's mathematical analysis "PROOF" of anything that would/could happen in a football game?

Hootie 01-13-2015 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 11267080)
so some guys mathematical analysis says it so it HAS to be right?


seriously?
Nope. Please quote where I said this.

It's an article featured on ESPN.

I found it interesting that Brady, a guy who has never had any weapons, has a team that is projected to be 13-13 in the games he's started in the playoffs with a replacement level QB.

Do you not agree with WAR in baseball? It's pretty much the hottest stat in baseball.

It's called wins above replacement.

Are you saying football can't have WAR?

Oh, ok.

SAUTO 01-13-2015 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 11267087)
You're looking at the first chart, where the second one, down the page, is where he runs the numbers with a replacement-level QB, which is what the text you quoted is talking about.

In this chart, Brady ranks 6th, behind Eli, Montana, Warner, Flacco, and Elway.
so are you saying hootie read the wrong mathematical analysis "proof"?

Easy 6 01-13-2015 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PizzaDoughz (Post 11267081)
I don't think he's going to stop anytime soon.
I think we all need to line up and take turns slapping him back to reality like in Airplane.

Hootie 01-13-2015 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 11267087)
You're looking at the first chart, where the second one, down the page, is where he runs the numbers with a replacement-level QB, which is what the text you quoted is talking about.

In this chart, Brady ranks 6th, behind Eli, Montana, Warner, Flacco, and Elway.
Yeah, I know. The thread title was for trolling purposes only.

So far, it has worked.

PizzaDoughz 01-13-2015 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 11267089)
how is some guy's mathematical analysis "PROOF" of anything that would/could happen in a football game?
It's proof as long as it fits Hootie's agenda apparently

SAUTO 01-13-2015 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11267093)
Nope. Please quote where I said this.

It's an article featured on ESPN.

I found it interesting that Brady, a guy who has never had any weapons, has a team that is projected to be 13-13 in the games he's started in the playoffs with a replacement level QB.

Do you not agree with WAR in baseball? It's pretty much the hottest stat in baseball.

It's called wins above replacement.

Are you saying football can't have WAR?

Oh, ok.
LMAO


you said it was "PROOF", do you neeed me to quote that post again



what does steamer say?

MagicHef 01-13-2015 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 11267096)
so are you saying hootie read the wrong mathematical analysis "proof"?
I think the only thing he got wrong is the thread title, it should say 6th, not 43rd.

Donger 01-13-2015 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11267099)
Yeah, I know. The thread title was for trolling purposes only.

So far, it has worked.
Can you provide one reason why you shouldn't receive a time out for this? You do remember that you allowed back on a short leash, yes?

Hootie 01-13-2015 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 11267096)
so are you saying hootie read the wrong mathematical analysis "proof"?
No, not at all.

Brady's teams 12.6 - 13.4 with replacement level QB
Manning's teams 8 - 16

and if you don't want to agree with that, fine

but baseball geeks think of WAR as gospel, and none of this was math done by me

It was research done by someone who has more credentials than anyone on this board.

Hootie 01-13-2015 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donger (Post 11267104)
Can you provide one reason why you shouldn't receive a time out for this? You do remember that you allowed back on a short leash, yes?
I was never allowed back on a short leash and I'm pretty sure I'm allowed to talk about football on this board.

You suck a lot of dick, and it grosses me out.

notorious 01-13-2015 12:31 PM
I see that Flacco is #3.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 PM.
Page 3 of 14 12 3 456713 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.