![]() |
Quote:
Ugh. I deleted my post mocking you because you changed yours. First, the judge can't NOT take the case. He doesn't get to just not take cases. Only the SCOTUS can do that. Second, yes, I'm sure about this. Goodell could revisit the process and try to fix the procedure and possibly fix the issues that Berman cites, but if the penalty is vacated, then it's gone, and Goodell is sort of back to square one. Or he can (and almost certainly will) appeal to the Second Circuit. |
Quote:
|
|
|
Here's an article explaining some stuff, of course, a Pats fan refutes it and then another guy at the end of the article backs up the stats:
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/deflate...07565-nfl.html |
That old battle axe Berman better stick to the law and the ruling of the Supreme Court in 2001 and rule for NFL. Brady should not be allowed to cry and whine his way onto the field. 20 other players are doing their time like men. So should he.
|
Quote:
Please note: First, he actually decided to take the case on. That's rare enough when dueling parties have previously contractually agreed to allow disputes to be handled by arbitration. But rather than punting the case immediately, as I and other legal analysts figured would happen, Berman has tolerated multiple briefings and hearings, with more to come. http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/...iots-tom-brady |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So why aren't you suggesting that the Colts and Falcons are cheating, based on this chart? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Are you still waiting for the trial that he will conduct afterwards?? |
I literally couldn't care less.
|
You know they will rule in favor of Brady and a Union.
rules don't apply to professional football players Even murders are running at about 25% iirc |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.