ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs AFC west Draft Grades (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=299649)

DaneMcCloud 05-01-2016 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 12209749)
I am so sick of how the Chiefs are managed compared to the Broncos.

The Broncos are able to mask their wants better, they're able to sign players cheaper and manage the cap better. It's very frustrating.

Go away, Voyager, forever.

You and your twice a day mock drafts are not missed.

**** off into the sunset.

Direckshun 05-01-2016 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12209759)
Go away, Voyager, forever.

You and your twice a day mock drafts are not missed.

**** off into the sunset.

People aren't jumping the Donks in the draft. The Donks are jumping teams.

Paxton Lynch isn't Peyton Manning, but it's pretty telling that we both wanted Manning, and the Broncos get him. We allegedly both wanted Lynch, and the Broncos get him.

wazu 05-01-2016 01:54 AM

Can't grade a draft until five decades later when everyone is already fired and/or dead.

/CP

DenverChief 05-01-2016 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 12209785)
Can't grade a draft until five decades later when everyone is already fired and/or dead.

/CP

You forgot the part about being classified top secret and requiring a FOIA request after 50 years but no guarantees. LMAO

Coochie liquor 05-01-2016 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 12209783)
People aren't jumping the Donks in the draft. The Donks are jumping teams.

Paxton Lynch isn't Peyton Manning, but it's pretty telling that we both wanted Manning, and the Broncos get him. We allegedly both wanted Lynch, and the Broncos get him.

The Dungkeys were jumping teams because their qb situation is ****ed. Guess what? It's still ****ed. They drafted a guy who prob shouldn't be starting for at least 2 years. He's gonna be sitting behind Dirty Sanchez who is not that good a qb. Our qb situation is much better (at least as far as starters go). We allegedly wanted Lynch, but nobody on this site actually knows what the thinking really was. if you're complaining about how they jumped teams to get their "guy" who hasn't proven anything yet and will likely ride the bench until he's thrown in the fire because Dungvers qb situation is horrid, then that just sounds like unwarranted complaining.

Pasta Little Brioni 05-01-2016 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 12209749)
I am so sick of how the Chiefs are managed compared to the Broncos.

The Broncos are able to mask their wants better, they're able to sign players cheaper and manage the cap better. It's very frustrating.

Dumbass :rolleyes: they were desperate and moved up for a QB that may not even be able to play in this league. He's never read a defense, called plays, or played under center. KC decided they wanted no part of that and took a hung stud.

Direckshun 05-01-2016 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coochie liquor (Post 12209826)
The Dungkeys were jumping teams because their qb situation is ****ed. Guess what? It's still ****ed. They drafted a guy who prob shouldn't be starting for at least 2 years. He's gonna be sitting behind Dirty Sanchez who is not that good a qb. Our qb situation is much better (at least as far as starters go). We allegedly wanted Lynch, but nobody on this site actually knows what the thinking really was. if you're complaining about how they jumped teams to get their "guy" who hasn't proven anything yet and will likely ride the bench until he's thrown in the fire because Dungvers qb situation is horrid, then that just sounds like unwarranted complaining.

They jumped teams to get a player they viewed as a franchise quarterback in the first round (which your hilariously reductive description universally defines).

Allegedly, if the Chiefs were going to take him at 28, or trade up to get him, they felt similarly. And simply put, they were less aggressive or felt the price was too high.

It's a ****ing franchise QB -- you usually have to spend to get one. And it's the most important position in sports.

Direckshun 05-01-2016 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12209827)
Dumbass :rolleyes: they were desperate and moved up for a QB that may not even be able to play in this league. He's never read a defense, called plays, or played under center. KC decided they wanted no part of that and took a hung stud.

*I'M* not the one saying we should have scooped up Lynch. The Chiefs allegedly were.

And they played passive to the Broncos' aggressive.

Elway gets his guy. The Chiefs cross their fingers and hope.

Coochie liquor 05-01-2016 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 12209831)
They jumped teams to get a player they viewed as a franchise quarterback in the first round (which your hilariously reductive description universally defines).

Allegedly, if the Chiefs were going to take him at 28, or trade up to get him, they felt similarly. And simply put, they were less aggressive or felt the price was too high.

It's a ****ing franchise QB -- you usually have to spend to get one. And it's the most important position in sports.

So a guy who has never taken a 5 or 7 step drop as qb is now a franchise qb?:shake Thry may have drafted the player you wanted, but fortunately for us Dorsey knows more about him than you do. We actually have a starting qb right now that can play at a high level. Lynch hasn't shown shit. Dungver has a history of not drafting great starting qbs, and it will continue with Lynch. God I can't believe you're calling him a franchise qb. He's a project at best at this point.

Pasta Little Brioni 05-01-2016 06:49 AM

Lynch isn't a franchise QB...not even close. He's in the Geno Smith "I'M desperate as hell so he'll do camp". Huuuuge dropoff between backstreet boy and Goff.

Direckshun 05-01-2016 06:55 AM

I'm actually agnostic on Lynch. But if the Chiefs think a guy is a franchise QB, you and I better both hope they do what they need to do to bring him in.

Rausch 05-01-2016 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12209708)
I saw this draft as being nothing but depth additions so I can't give it much more than a C, but that's just me. I don't see a starter among the picks unless they boom instead of bust.

Same.

I could see our DT getting heavy PT as the season goes on and hopefully we use him to keep Poe fresh.

Our G should be able to win a starting job. We'll see what happens after that.

After that it was depth at WR and CB. I wish we would have went CB in round 2 and DT in 3 or later but...we'll see...

Mr. Laz 05-01-2016 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12209713)
Would you PLEASE stop posting unreadable horseshit?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12209717)
What? You said not six hours ago that you "hated" the Russell selection because he wasn't Vonn Bell.

You're truly sick.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12209725)
Good ****ing grief.

I have no words for your massive, egregious dumbassery.

So don't come into this threads.

You have this borderline stalker obsession with attacking the OP's every post so just stop coming into his threads.

Dude, just calm down.

Pasta Little Brioni 05-01-2016 07:16 AM

He's right though

RealSNR 05-01-2016 07:23 AM

Who the **** is Chase Daniels?

This guy is a national writer?

Does he know that Hogan will be the 3rd stringer?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.