I don't blame you... this show is aimed at people much younger than us.

I'll still watch it just to see where they take Trek way into the future. I'll grudge watch it until I can't anymore. But I made it through Discovery so I'm hopeful I can do the same with Academy.

Since they are open to making movies now I am kinda hoping to see a movie that features Scott Bakula return as Archer. It would turn into a spy drama where he runs into Trip Tucker (Connor Trinneer) as he is fleeing after having been burned by Section 31 after disobeying orders on how to deal with some sort of incoming threat.

They wind up on the refit NX-01 that we never got to see because of those rat bastards at UPN:

https://i.imgur.com/GadHlS1.png



/you may or may not know that in the book series that followed it was found that Section 31 had snagged Trip right before he "was killed" and he began working for them instead. This would follow that storyline.

I loathe Tilly. I basically hate everything about Discovery except for the parts that featured Pike and Spock. Once they were gone, so was I. I lasted about five minutes into season 3 and never watched another second of it.

SNW may have it's lame/awkward moments, but overall I love it. Hard to believe it originated where it did, like a phoenix rising from a pile of shit instead of flies.

Not happening. Have you seen Bakula lately?

https://www.etonline.com/sites/defau...jpg?h=d1cb525d

They would have to CGI the hell out of his face.

The man is younger than Jonathan Frakes who was all over Picard S3 and definitely younger that Stewart. Give him 8 months and an 12 month supply of HGH and he would be ready to rock.

Why would they need to CGI his face? He can be 69 years old and still doing Starfleet shit. This movie would be set post Romulan war and the man went through hell during that time. It aged him hard.

/edit... I would also be happy to see him cameo in SNW. I know that in book cannon he died in 2245 but that number could be stretched a bit to take him onto the bridge of the NCC-1701 Enterprise. He would be, roughly, 149 years old which isn't out of the realm of possibility for humans in the future. If McCoy lived to 137 it seems reasonable that someone who would receive the level of medical care that Archer would could make it to 149.

Yeah, in terms of characters to continue they certainly could have done worse. But personally I'd rather lop Discovery off the Star Trek tree like a diseased limb and pretend it never happened. So ties to Discovery plus Kurtzman as co-showrunner are two huge strikes against it for me.

No, I know what you mean. It's hard to think of an Admiral who wasn't a prick or up to some shit. Maybe Admiral Ross from DS9, but even he ended up being complicit with Section 31.

Looks like he could pull off 147 year old Archer on SNW. Star Trek 09 did establish he's still alive around that timeframe (in JJ-verse at least). :shrug:

A SNW Episode called "The Search for Porthos" where Scotty picks up a signal and figures out that Porthos's transporter signal was caught up in a temporal space rift (or insert other technobable) and the crew reaches out to retired Admiral Archer to let him know that Scotty found the dog he transported away all those years ago.

Hell... Phlox could come along as Archer's personal physician.

Sopmething happens, the crew suffers some sort of malady that forces Archer to take command and Phlox to heal everyone. Archer saves the day, gets his dog back, then goes back home to live out his days feeding cheese to his best friend.

---

God damn... I should be a writer. This is gold.