![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A guy that's starter level right away? Because that's not a project. |
Quote:
If you're Baltimore, a perennial contender picking in the low 20's every season-why would you let an above average LT go? You can't replace him in the draft, you pick too low. You can't replace him in free agency, it'll cost as much or more and the pickings are slim. So why wouldn't you just re-sign the guy you have? The ONLY reason is that you don't think he's going to be physically able, and in that case, KC should be very wary also. And THAT is all I have to say on Ronnie Stanley. |
Quote:
I'd keep Staley if I were them but I can see the arguments against. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yeah, he has short arms, but he isn't getting beat in that game by any of the moves that typically give tackles with short arms a problem. |
Quote:
It wouldn't surprise me if they're planning to move everything on offense but Nacua and Williams, re-set, and if they end up awful... being so, so sad about being in position to take Archie Manning... and then support him on a rookie deal with a young, dynamic defense and a young, dynamic offense. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Alaric Jackson plays well, that matters most. That's why I think Conerly is a fit. Ultra-athletic like Peters was and has longer arms than Peters. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.