OUCH Greg!!! That sounds very much like every Chief fan I've ever met! Especially ME!! http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/eek.gif

I desparately hope you are exagerating.

------------------
[b]ct
Give TRich the Ball!!!</B>

What am I talking about? It's quite simple: IMO, DW and Glock BOTH need to either take tremendous pay cuts, or be traded due to their bloated cap numbers.

"Put down your box scores, and open your eyes, Clint. Players make plays that never show on stat sheets."

I agree, but all the same guys that put up great numbers on stat sheets are the SAME ONES that make plays that DON'T show up on stat sheets, like DT. Glock NEVER puts up great numbers. Why is he the only so-called "great" player in the league that NEVER puts up great numbers, even in big games? Other "great" defensive tackles can, at least occasionally, put up big-time numbers, regardless of the talent around them.

I've asked this more than once: Now that the rest of the DL has stepped up, why haven't Glock's numbers improved? Poor DE play was the standard excuse for Glock's pathetic numbers last year. What's going to be the excuse this year?

[This message has been edited by Clint in Wichita (edited 09-28-2000).]

Titus, you're just trying to compensate for getting your a*s kicked in the Bono debate by Cannibal.

Have "hot, steamy sex" with McGlockton! http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/tongue.gif

If Clint is HC, and you cut Glock and DW, who then plays DefTackle? What is this positions' value towards the total cap? How much would you pay your two DTs?

------------------
[b]ct
Give TRich the Ball!!!</B>

Clint: LMAO...compensate for what? Im pretty sure it wasnt me who made an *** of himself. Obviously, you didnt read the posts either.

not suprising.

Oh, believe me, I read every word of that thread. You got your a*s kicked. Attempting to act dignified and mature changes nothing. You lost.

CoryT,

I'd be happy with a rotation of Ransom, Martin, and Browning at DT. I'm sure those guys can "clog up the middle" as well as any other fat, slow DT. KC would take a cap hit in the short term, but in the near future that money could be spent on players that might actually make a measureable contribution.

(deleted dbl post)

[This message has been edited by KCTitus (edited 09-28-2000).]

Clint: coming from you, that's a compliment. If you think I 'lost' that 'great' debate, I know for a fact I 'won'.

If you want to be a punk about it, too, feel free to email me at the address I posted. You can prove your intellect as well to me. LOL!

"Clint: coming from you, that's a compliment. If you think I 'lost' that 'great' debate, I know for a fact I 'won'."

ROTFLMAO!!!!

Well, I guess I was wrong about acting mature.

I'm rubber and you're glue. What you say bounces off me and sticks to you.

You're right, you're not mature...nice post, is that the best you can come up with. Email me...we can discuss.

Na nanny boo-boo, stick your head in doo-doo!

good one...you might want to save stuff this good when your objectivity is once again called into question.

This is too easy.

You'd have to be an idiot to "question my objectivity", because I never claimed to be objective in the first place!

I said I wanted Dan Williams and Chester McGlockton OUT OF KC! If you read that and think that I'm trying to establish any sort of objectivity, you are delusional.

Titus - So Canibal was still trying to say that you thought Bono was going to take us to the SB because you said it was stupid of Schottheimer to try to suddenly switch from a team that relied on the run to a team that suddenly tried to rely on the weak excuse for an arm of Bono and lost because of it? Yeah, I see the logic there.