I am curious how much this would indeed effect the draft. I think geno has tools to become great but not yet. the bigger question for me then is in everyone's opinion should the chiefs take smith in round one, or trade back and aquire a second round pick and take someone like ej manuel?
by the way everyone the voting on the chiefs pick in round one has begun. 24hrs remain to get ur vote in at profootballexpress.com im still a rookie to this forum so my apologies for not being able to get the exact link posted as of yet. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I expect him to be there April 1. No reason to holdout now.. If he is throwing routes to Bowe be prepared for Geno to be ours.. . |
Quote:
1) There's no way we get a haul of picks in this draft to justify it because there doesn't exist any true generational talent for anyone to jump at. The fact that they would attempt to package Albert gives testimony to this fact. 2) The QB position in KC has gone from "atrocious" to "questionable" at best, and niether of those options scream "building a championship team for the future"(!). Both Geno and Matt are PERFECT developmental guys with true upside that can and would bose well for the future of the Chiefs, and I see slim pickings in immediate future drafts for the QB position. The time is without question...now. Posted via Mobile Device |
i don't deny that there is not much in the top of this draft worth trading up for, however is that not more of a red flag as to whom to draft as well? it should be worry some that no one would want to trade up for a potential franchise qb. I think you throw the draft trade chart right out the window, and if you can get a second round pick and slide back a few spots, or hell half way down the draft, then you do it. there might not be elite players early, but there are very very good starters avail in the mid of round one, and the possibility to land ej manuel or barkley or one of the other qb's in round two, perhaps you do so.
|
ProFootballCentral just said that the Chiefs interest in Geno is real and not a smokescreen.
BTW they were credited on NFL Network. They I guess are a legit source now. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
For real, though, I hope they're right this time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
With Bowe A smith and the WHOLE staff there to watch him. Hmm?? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If he actually partakes than we know he is serious about being one of the best!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That makes him a top 10 player. Dickless troll |
Quote:
|
If it was smokescreen, it isn't any more. Joke is the Chiefs smokescreen. Always has been.
I suspect the Reid and Dorsey, while may think highly of Alex Smith aren't going to be banking on him alone. They are smart enough to know that Chase Daniel is a stop-gap, an also-ran, a perennial b/u. They know that Alex Smith has 1 year to prove himself here. Them taking his contract as is, essentially makes Alex Smith in a contract year. He doesn't do well and returns to his pre-Harbaugh days, no reason to resign to an extension. And then back to right where we were a few weeks ago. Looking for a QB. That is not a position I would think Reid and Dorsey want to find themselves in. I still think Geno will be KC's pick at #1. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think KC is stuck with the 1.1. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
Let the hand play out before you FIRMLY believe they cant play poker. |
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
The draft hasnt even happened. We dont know if they are going to raise, slow play, check raise, go all in etc. We dont know. YOU DONT EITHER. So, lets see how the hand plays out, and then we can discuss whether or not they know how to play poker. |
You don't bring in a prospect for 2 days as a smokescreen.
|
Quote:
Also, here is what smart Chief fans are talking about; http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2013/3...as-city-chiefs |
Quote:
|
It would be very interesting if the Chiefs' WRs really are there for the Geno Smith workout.
Bowe,Baldwin,DmC,Avery ... maybe Charles If those players are there then Geno Smith became a legit possibility at 1.1 for us. Imo. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VFwXmz1KGoQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
If we select Geno; dope, guns, and ****ing in the streets!
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
So, really, who is the dumb ones? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They can trade him, pick up extra picks, and draft his replacement, who is 8 years younger, and will cost half as much. Its business sense. Something that Clearly eludes some on this board. Flame away, but I cant believe how difficult of a concept this is for some people...... The best olinemen in football, usually start showing their age about 31, 32 years old. meaning that if you give him a franchise contract right now for 4 years, hes 33 years old when it ends, where as if you trade him now, draft joeckell, in 4 years hes 25 years old, and not even entering his prime. This is that difficult? |
Quote:
Question......Who was the last number one overrall qb to win a super bowl? Answer, Eli Manning. the other one in the last decade? Peyton Manning. Meaning, that Matt Stafford, Alex Smith, David Carr, Jamarcus Russell, Andrew Luck, Sam Bradford Tim Couch, Michael Vick, have not only not won a super bowl, they havent even played in one. meanwhile, Tom brady, 6th round pick, Drew Brees, second round pick, joe flacco, 16th pick, Ben Roethlisberger, 11th pick, Aaron Rodgers 24th pick, have won super bowls, meaning that the majority of super bowls, are won by players not picked first overrall.......So odds are that if say the chiefs pass on the qb this year, and grab one next year, that players odds are going to be higher, since you wont have the first pick next year, of winning a super bowl as super geno if he went first...... Logic. Its pretty basic..... |
The only thing Geno Smith has done to earn him the title of being unworthy to be drafted one overall is the fact that he is going to be drafted one year after Andrew Luck and RGIII. Of course 99.9% of every QB leaving college is going to be compared to that scale and fail.
Any other year, and Geno would be a lock to be drafted by us by every prognosticator out there. "Well, I don't think he's as good as Andrew Luck, so I'm not sure I'd waste a first on him. Plus, Russell Wislon was drafted in the third, so there will be value later in the draft." It's all bullshit. Not good enough for us, but potentially good enough for the next seven teams that draft. Makes zero sense. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hes 5'11. There were no questions about his qb ability, only his height. The only knock on Barkley, seems to be arm strength, the knocks on Geno Smith, are he has a high reward ceiling, he wows you with accuracy, and arm strength, and mobility, but his question marks are about the smarts of the position. Some scouts saying he cant read defenses, some saying that he has SLOW EYES, (i had never even heard of that term) Also, this is considered to be a draft with safe players, but no superstars, and yet, in that he cant be considered elite. Thats not a good sign. Hes not good enough for the chiefs? Who the hell said that? The draft hasnt come, no one knows who they are really eyeing. But, just the fact that he could be good enough for the Jags, Raiders, eagles, cards, or bills, doesnt mean that he is the end all be all. What it means is that their qb situations are absolutely awful. The jags have gabbert, who is just awful, the raiders cant get palmer to restructure so if they cut him they have pryor, eek, the eagles, who the hell knows with them, i sure dont, the browns arent drafting a qb, the lions arent, the cards, who knows with them, other than fitz, what do they have that couldnt be an upgrade? and the bills, who have tavaris jackson. The chiefs have a decent enough qb option this year, that they dont have to reach for a qb if they dont think hes a sure fire franchise qb. That should be enough for chiefs fans to at least give them a chance to see if their plan works....... |
Quote:
You are however, going to be right or wrong depending on 1.1 I will be neither, as i stated, i dont know what the chiefs plan to do, or what they really think of Geno, as in I dont really have a horse in this race, i dont really care either way what they do. |
Quote:
I already know the answer......... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you have a player that is insubordinate, then you have to check other options. Thats how it is smart........You can feel insulted if you want, but why ask the question if you didnt want an answer? |
Quote:
|
"Decent enough QB option for this year". Sorry, that doesn't exactly sell me on not taking Geno. Take the kid, let him sit behind Alex and Chase, let Andy work on whatever weaknesses HE (not the rest of us) sees, then turn him loose next year.
There is NO REASON to not be stacked at the QB position. None. And with the moves Dorsey has made so far, they have put us in a position of having the top overall pick be a luxury pick. It's ****ing genius. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
At all. Hasnt worked against cam, Russel Wilson, Kaepernick, or rg3. What is working against him is that to the experts, he is too high of a boom or bust risk that teams are scared. Im not sure why the west virginia thing is working against him. He is clearly heads and shoulders ahead of pat white as a qb, and pat white got drafted. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Packers had Craig Nall as Favre's backup when they drafted Rodgers.
Chiefs can get out of Chase Daniels contract after a year. I think they are really taking a long look at him. No smokescreen. |
If Smith is as good as the Geno-ites believe, then KC will walk away with at least two firsts and a second at a minimum.
|
I CAN HAZ BONER AGAIN?!?!?!?!
|
Quote:
I think he's about as accurate as you'll find. |
Quote:
I guess it means that he has a problem from moving to read one, to two, to three? That was a new on one me. |
Quote:
They can also cut alex smith loose after a year as well..... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But it's nothing short of baffling to think that it took them this long to truly evaluate him. |
I don't know the conditions for the Alex Smith trade, for the draft pick in 2014. Maybe if he isn't on the roster in 2014 there is no draft pick. That would expain the high price of giving a 2nd this year for the loser.
|
Quote:
Geno Smith's numbers last year were nearly identical to RGIII's senior season, minus the rushing stats. Why in the blue shit would we not want a guy that is capable of up putting production like that on our team? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.