ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Should the Chiefs have drafted Aaron Rodgers over Derrick Johnson? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=188932)

Deberg_1990 09-07-2009 12:09 PM

Bump. :)

Mr. Krab 09-07-2009 12:17 PM

Shit, Aaron Rodgers would of be dead or out of the league by now under Herm.

Mecca 09-07-2009 03:15 PM

Yea this one is pretty blatant now.

OnTheWarpath15 09-07-2009 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6043113)
Yea this one is pretty blatant now.

Yep.

I ate my crow and came to my senses last year.

Funny to see people still fighting this.

Dottefan 09-07-2009 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiL stumppy (Post 4908498)
Not really because at the time we were a decent team and were looking for a few players to make us a good team, and we obviously needed help on D. Could go either way really.

This.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-07-2009 03:20 PM

I got ripped last year for suggesting we trade him for a second rounder.

OnTheWarpath15 09-07-2009 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6043123)
I got ripped last year for suggesting we trade him for a second rounder.

Christ.

Not sure we could get a 4th for him now.

Mecca 09-07-2009 03:23 PM

Aaron Rodgers is a future league MVP, he is the shit. He will after this year likely be considered one of the top 5 QB's in the league.

Even if Derrick Johnson was good, which he's not, we ****ed up the pick.

Jim Jones 09-07-2009 03:32 PM

Hey, it happens. Everyone here loved the DJ pick at the time and most people thought Rodgers would be a bust coming out of Cal. Hindsight is a beautiful thing.

Mecca 09-07-2009 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Jones (Post 6043162)
Hey, it happens. Everyone here loved the DJ pick at the time and most people thought Rodgers would be a bust coming out of Cal. Hindsight is a beautiful thing.

You're right, all of us were shaded and thought we were close to a superbowl so we had to go defense.

WilliamTheIrish 09-07-2009 03:39 PM

Another good bump.

This one makes me sick though.

Deberg_1990 09-07-2009 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6043133)
Aaron Rodgers is a future league MVP, he is the shit. He will after this year likely be considered one of the top 5 QB's in the league.

Even if Derrick Johnson was good, which he's not, we ****ed up the pick.

Crap like this is why Carl Peterson no longer is employed.

Especially while DV was here they only thought about the here and now. Never about the future.

The one pick they did think about the future was the LJ pick which ended up being decent.

Mecca 09-07-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 6043184)
Crap like this is why Carl Peterson now longer is employed.

Especially while DV was here they only thought about the here and now. Never about the future.

The one pick they did think about the future was the LJ pick which ended up being decent.

That's cause DV was older than dirt, he had no interest in building a team for the coach after him.

That was why we had a team full of vets.

Marcellus 09-07-2009 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 6043184)
Crap like this is why Carl Peterson no longer is employed.

Especially while DV was here they only thought about the here and now. Never about the future.

The one pick they did think about the future was the LJ pick which ended up being decent.

I don't think ANYBODY at the time would have thought drafting Rogers over DJ would have been smart at the time.You really can't bitch about that pick, it just didn't work out or hasn't yet. I would not be surprised to see DJ wake up and have a great year finally. He has shown the talent at times but not consistently enough obviously.

Now there are plenty of other DV and Edwards era Peterson picks you can bust on. In fact plenty of Marty era ones as well.

notorious 09-07-2009 04:00 PM

Aaron Rodgers would have had the worst coaching imaginable here in KC. His talent would have been wasted and he would be looked upon as a 1st round bust.

CupidStunt 09-07-2009 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6043116)
Yep.

I ate my crow and came to my senses last year.

Funny to see people still fighting this.

It's hindsight. This board would've ****ing melted down if they took Rodgers over DJ. Rightfully so.

DJ was the right pick AT THE TIME.

Just like Glenn Dorsey was the right pick last year, but I'm sure we'll have an equally dumb thread soon asking if we should've taken a far inferior PROSPECT over him.

Mecca 09-07-2009 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6043205)
I don't think ANYBODY at the time would have thought drafting Rogers over DJ would have been smart at the time.You really can't bitch about that pick, it just didn't work out or hasn't yet. I would not be surprised to see DJ wake up and have a great year finally. He has shown the talent at times but not consistently enough obviously.

Now there are plenty of other DV and Edwards era Peterson picks you can bust on. In fact plenty of Marty era ones as well.

Sure you can, it shows a lack of foresight that one has to have on draft day.

KCChiefsMan 09-07-2009 04:03 PM

hindsight is always 20/20

stevieray 09-07-2009 04:03 PM

oh look...

the draft is back.

DeezNutz 09-07-2009 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 6043249)
Aaron Rodgers would have had the worst coaching imaginable here in KC. His talent would have been wasted and he would be looked upon as a 1st round bust.

Superior talent can trump dumbass coaching.

notorious 09-07-2009 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6043262)
Superior talent can trump dumbass coaching.

Elway-type talent can.

Could Aaron's talent overcome an atrocious offensive line and the worst coaching KC has ever had?

Aaron stepped onto a team that was coming off a 13-3 season that had a pretty good O-Line and excellent receivers. Let's not kid ourselves into thinking he would have done that well here.

notorious 09-07-2009 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 6043261)
oh look...

the draft is back.

That's all we have had as Chiefs fans lately.



Pathetic.

Mecca 09-07-2009 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 6043326)
Elway-type talent can.

Could Aaron's talent overcome an atrocious offensive line and the worst coaching KC has ever had?

Aaron stepped onto a team that was coming off a 13-3 season that had a pretty good O-Line and excellent receivers. Let's not kid ourselves into thinking he would have done that well here.

When Rodgers was drafted the Chiefs were still a pretty solid team for the most part. It is reasonable to think if they had a young QB they felt was the future sitting behind Green they'd have put alot more resources into prepping to replace the older offensive players than they did.

Marcellus 09-07-2009 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6043255)
Sure you can, it shows a lack of foresight that one has to have on draft day.

Who thought DJ was not going to be a great LB? That was the only foresight needed.

Mecca 09-07-2009 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6043344)
Who thought DJ was not going to be a great LB? That was the only foresight needed.

I can hit you back with LB's aren't worth first rounders.

OnTheWarpath15 09-07-2009 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6043344)
Who thought DJ was not going to be a great LB? That was the only foresight needed.

The 14 teams that passed on him, even though he was supposedly thought of as a Top 5 pick?

Mecca 09-07-2009 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6043351)
The 14 teams that passed on him, even though he was supposedly thought of as a Top 5 pick?

I remember that year...and how many of us were like "No we want DJ not DeMarcus Ware"

notorious 09-07-2009 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6043334)
When Rodgers was drafted the Chiefs were still a pretty solid team for the most part. It is reasonable to think if they had a young QB they felt was the future sitting behind Green they'd have put alot more resources into prepping to replace the older offensive players than they did.

By the time he would have been ready Shields would have been retired. Besides, if I remember correctly, KC was in full overboard mode in fixing Defense. The savior Herm was going to turn things around on that side of the ball, hence the reason they tried to get him some players. Offense wasn't a problem then, so I doubt they would have put anything more into it.

All hypothetical. Looking back, hell ya I would take Rodgers. I believe he would have been wasted with our pathetic coaching.

CoMoChief 09-07-2009 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6043354)
I remember that year...and how many of us were like "No we want DJ not DeMarcus Ware"

Ware wouldnt thrive in a 4-3 like he does in the 3-4. He's a rushbacker

Mecca 09-07-2009 11:57 PM

Ware would have been a DE in a 4-3.

Demonpenz 09-08-2009 09:03 AM

If anyone saw DJ in college he was making plays Ever ****ing play. INT's Sacks, tackles for losses, stripping balls, getting under full backs. He looked like a bad ass and has shown flashes here and there. Just hasn't panned out, guys are just a bit faster and fatter at the pro level and he can't weave slice like he did at texas

riskrevival 09-08-2009 09:07 AM

so what we learn here is Texas plays teams occasionally smaller than them and to never draft a player from Texas again.

Red Dawg 09-08-2009 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dorseybowe (Post 4908503)
Johnson had better value when we were drafting. He still does. Rodgers hasn't proved he can play.


The hell you say.

InChiefsHeaven 09-08-2009 10:12 AM

I can't believe DJ is now relegated to 3rd string. That really...really...sucks. I hope he can turn it around this year, but last year was the last chance at a possible break out year. At this point, I think he is what he is. Just OK.

The Franchise 09-08-2009 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6044356)
Ware would have been a DE in a 4-3.

And Carl wouldn't have paid Ware or Allen.....so we'd still be dicked.

SAUTO 09-08-2009 11:37 AM

what was the pack's record the year before he started? what was their record last year? hell if you listen to OTWP the QB should RAISE the play of the players around him so why did the record go backwards? and, again thanks otwp, isnt the QB solely responsible for wins and losses?

DaWolf 09-08-2009 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6043351)
The 14 teams that passed on him, even though he was supposedly thought of as a Top 5 pick?

The big criticism was that he couldn't fight off blocks.

I think DJ has just fallen into the category of great talent who doesn't have the "want it". When coaches have to move you to MIKE in order to get you to keep your head in the game, you know you've got an issue with the guy. If someone does not want to put in the time or effort to be into every play, despite the talent, he becomes a liability. Either the light needs to go on for DJ, or he's just another one of those guys who made his money and who can fade into the background.

The reason the Ravens have had such a great defense while we've had such crap ones is because they draft guys with that intense persona and desire to be the best. We have drafted guys who supposedly have potential but who don't have that desire. In other words, in this decade we have drafted a bunch of soft players on D...

Demonpenz 09-08-2009 12:28 PM

after all the yapping DJ is still going to be in the nfl for 8 years starting for 5 or 6 of them. Not a bad career.

Demonpenz 09-08-2009 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 6045323)
The big criticism was that he couldn't fight off blocks.

I think DJ has just fallen into the category of great talent who doesn't have the "want it". When coaches have to move you to MIKE in order to get you to keep your head in the game, you know you've got an issue with the guy. If someone does not want to put in the time or effort to be into every play, despite the talent, he becomes a liability. Either the light needs to go on for DJ, or he's just another one of those guys who made his money and who can fade into the background.

The reason the Ravens have had such a great defense while we've had such crap ones is because they draft guys with that intense persona and desire to be the best. We have drafted guys who supposedly have potential but who don't have that desire. In other words, in this decade we have drafted a bunch of soft players on D...

He has also been on some shitty teams with shitty coaching schemes. His equivilent was Derrick Brooks, Brooks had Booger, Sapp, hardy nickerson, good secondary, and kiffen on that team oh what could have been

DeezNutz 09-08-2009 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 6043326)
Elway-type talent can.

Could Aaron's talent overcome an atrocious offensive line and the worst coaching KC has ever had?

Aaron stepped onto a team that was coming off a 13-3 season that had a pretty good O-Line and excellent receivers. Let's not kid ourselves into thinking he would have done that well here.

He went into a great situation. No question.

But when you can fill the most important position on the field with a high-caliber young player, you have to do it.

Rarely will it be an ideal situation. The best QBs generally go to the shittiest teams or organizations more generally, yet some of these players still succeed.

Mr. Krab 09-08-2009 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 6043326)
Elway-type talent can.

Could Aaron's talent overcome an atrocious offensive line and the worst coaching KC has ever had?

Hell no, Marty shottenheimer pretty much proved that bad coaching can destroy young quarterbacks about as fast as you can draft them.

DeezNutz 09-08-2009 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Krab (Post 6045426)
Hell no, Marty shottenheimer pretty much proved that bad coaching can destroy young quarterbacks about as fast as you can draft them.

:spock:

DeBerg? Montana? Kreig? Bono? Grbac? Gannon?

Whom did he destroy?

Bernie? Rivers? Brees?

Or applause at the draft sarcasm...

Or Chiefs inept sarcasm...

Reerun_KC 09-08-2009 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Krab (Post 6045426)
Hell no, Marty shottenheimer pretty much proved that bad coaching can destroy young quarterbacks about as fast as you can draft them.

You could of stopped right there, enough was said...

TheGuardian 09-08-2009 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 6045323)
The big criticism was that he couldn't fight off blocks.

I think DJ has just fallen into the category of great talent who doesn't have the "want it". When coaches have to move you to MIKE in order to get you to keep your head in the game, you know you've got an issue with the guy. If someone does not want to put in the time or effort to be into every play, despite the talent, he becomes a liability. Either the light needs to go on for DJ, or he's just another one of those guys who made his money and who can fade into the background.

The reason the Ravens have had such a great defense while we've had such crap ones is because they draft guys with that intense persona and desire to be the best. We have drafted guys who supposedly have potential but who don't have that desire. In other words, in this decade we have drafted a bunch of soft players on D...

Great post. Sums up my thoughts on him exactly.

All this talk about how Derrick needs better players or a better team aruond him is absolute bullsnot. A great player on defense can easily stand out. Look at Nnamdi in Oakland. Surrounded by the worst damn talent in the whole league but everyone knows he's the best corner in the NFL. Jared Allen had no problem leading the league in sacks on basically the same defense that set a record for sack ineptness a year later.

Anyone who thinks that Johnson needs better players around him to TRULY showcase his talent don't know WTF they are talking about. Either Derrick can focus and play at a high level or he can't. Thus far he's shown the latter.

cdcox 09-08-2009 12:46 PM

I agree that Rodgers would have had a more difficult time succeeding in KC than he has in GB.

I agree that DJ has not lived up to his potential.

The conclusion I draw from these two statements is that KC has not been a good place for a rookie to come in and develop. If they do develop, it is despite the organization, not because of it. And that is why we are in year 3 of a rebuild that looks about 1/2 done. It is just complete organizational failure.

Hopefully Pioli and Haley begin to turn this around. It is going to take some time.

Chief Faithful 09-08-2009 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 6045323)
The big criticism was that he couldn't fight off blocks.

I think DJ has just fallen into the category of great talent who doesn't have the "want it". When coaches have to move you to MIKE in order to get you to keep your head in the game, you know you've got an issue with the guy. If someone does not want to put in the time or effort to be into every play, despite the talent, he becomes a liability. Either the light needs to go on for DJ, or he's just another one of those guys who made his money and who can fade into the background.

The reason the Ravens have had such a great defense while we've had such crap ones is because they draft guys with that intense persona and desire to be the best. We have drafted guys who supposedly have potential but who don't have that desire. In other words, in this decade we have drafted a bunch of soft players on D...

The big question is if Rodgers had the same coaching as DJ would he be a productive NFL QB or a bust?

Under Pioli I believe we will see draft picks with size, speed, strength and desire. Based on the final roster and depth chart it seems he has little patience for players that lack desire. If Pioli and Haley cannot bring out DJ's potential then I can't imagine anyone can. I predict by game 4 DJ is back on top the depth chart.

Deberg_1990 10-05-2009 09:22 PM

Bump..

Should the Chiefs have drafted Brett Favre over Harvey Williams in 1991? :)

WildTurkey 10-05-2009 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 6045460)
I agree that Rodgers would have had a more difficult time succeeding in KC than he has in GB.

I agree that DJ has not lived up to his potential.

The conclusion I draw from these two statements is that KC has not been a good place for a rookie to come in and develop. If they do develop, it is despite the organization, not because of it. And that is why we are in year 3 of a rebuild that looks about 1/2 done. It is just complete organizational failure.

Hopefully Pioli and Haley begin to turn this around. It is going to take some time.

you always take a franchise QB.... especially over a non pass rushing linebacker

Deberg_1990 01-10-2010 06:11 PM

What the heck, time for a bump....

Hammock Parties 01-10-2010 06:13 PM

**** **** **** **** **** **** **** ****

bevischief 01-10-2010 06:17 PM

yes...

bevischief 01-10-2010 06:20 PM

If we did we may never had to live through the Herm years...

Deberg_1990 01-10-2010 06:23 PM

Decisions like this are why the Chiefs are the Chiefs....

DaWolf 01-10-2010 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 6432088)
Decisions like this are why the Chiefs are the Chiefs....

A lot of teams probably should have taken Rodgers. And at the time, the team would have been killed if they drafted Rodgers over taking the "best player on the board" from Big XII country who people here had been salivating over.

I agree, the fact that we don't draft franchise difference players are why we are here today. The scarier thing is that Carl was salivating over the idea of drafting Joey Harrington a few years earlier (but Detroit took him which allowed us to throw away our pick anyway on Ryan Sims). It's scary how bad Carl was at evaluating young QB's...

Mecca 01-10-2010 07:30 PM

He's not part of the right 53.

FloridaMan88 01-10-2010 08:38 PM

Rodgers in the Chiefs current offense wouldn't be much better than Cassel.

The Bad Guy 01-10-2010 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 6432925)
Rodgers in the Chiefs current offense wouldn't be much better than Cassel.

Honestly might be the dumbest thing you've ever said on here. That's saying something.

I'm surprised you didn't blame "Fat Scott" for it either.

Are your pussy U players ever going to toughen up again? It must piss you off to watch that Documentary and then watch the Molly Shannon-led U team use space heaters on the sideline for a 49 degree game.

DeezNutz 01-10-2010 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 6432925)
Rodgers in the Chiefs current offense wouldn't be much better than Cassel.

Any good QB would be much better than Cassel. Does this mean that we'd win more games? Probably, but just a few.

Would the offense be far more productive? Of course. Because when you have a sack of ****ing shit QB, that kind of hampers things. Just like when we had a sack of shit RB, running the ball looked like a lost cause.

Statistically, we have damn near the worst QB in the league. FFS, of course it could be better.

RippedmyFlesh 01-10-2010 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 6432088)
Decisions like this are why the Chiefs are the Chiefs....

Blackledge over marino,kelly,obrien this team has never drafted a good qb.

Mr. Laz 01-10-2010 08:43 PM

Every team could do this shit about every draft, every year.


nobody selects the guy they should every round ... you just gotta hope you get a few quality players each draft.

DeezNutz 01-10-2010 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RippedmyFlesh (Post 6432935)
Blackledge over marino,kelly,obrien this team has never drafted a good qb.

Never? Sort of.

That's the last time we tried. ****.

We're fans of one of the most pussy franchises in the ****ing league.

milkman 01-10-2010 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6432936)
Every team could do this shit about every draft, every year.


nobody selects the guy they should every round ... you just gotta hope you get a few quality players each draft.

True.

But I don't think there's a single team with the history of the Chiefs that can lay claim to the fact that they have never, in franchise history, drafted and developed their own QB.

Titty Meat 01-10-2010 08:45 PM

This is tough because at the time I thought Rodgers would be just another Tedford QB.

doomy3 01-10-2010 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 6432925)
Rodgers in the Chiefs current offense wouldn't be much better than Cassel.

:spock:

DeezNutz 01-10-2010 08:47 PM

Kevin Kietzman is generally a dumbass, so use this as the preface to my comment. However...

For years he's said that if you don't have a franchise QB and you're in the position to draft the player who is regarded as the best or second best QB in the draft, you absolutely have to do it.

Can't say I disagree.

Mr. Laz 01-10-2010 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6432945)
True.

But I don't think there's a single team with the history of the Chiefs that can lay claim to the fact that they have never, in franchise history, drafted and developed their own QB.

no doubt ... our drafting has sucked major ass.

one of the worse in the entire league ... that's why we suck so bad.

Mecca 01-10-2010 08:50 PM

Who was it that use to argue that the Chiefs draft history was on par with most of the rest of the league?

DaneMcCloud 01-10-2010 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6432936)
Every team could do this shit about every draft, every year.


nobody selects the guy they should every round ... you just gotta hope you get a few quality players each draft.

WRONG.

Teams that consistently draft well also consistently WIN.

Baltimore, Pittsburgh, NY Giants, Indianapolis, San Diego, Philadelphia and Green Bay consistently draft well and don't reach. The result is year after year after year in the playoffs with the occasional Super Bowl appearance and win.

The Cardinals are another example of a franchise that has consistently drafted well but didn't hire the right coach until 2006. That team is LOADED with talent.

RippedmyFlesh 01-10-2010 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6432938)
Never? Sort of.

That's the last time we tried. ****.

We've fans of one of the most pussy franchises in the ****ing league.

There prob isn't a qb in kc top 10 all time qbs that was drafted by kc...think about that ..dawson montana green gannon ...brodie croyle is 18th all time kc qb in yardage...
http://www.pro-football-reference.co...er-passing.htm

my hope is cassel is a stop gap and we finally draft a qb that plays more than 3 years

DeezNutz 01-10-2010 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RippedmyFlesh (Post 6432965)
There prob isn't a qb in kc top 10 all time qbs that was drafted by kc...think about that ..dawson montana green gannon ...brodie croyle is 18th all time kc qb in yardage...
http://www.pro-football-reference.co...er-passing.htm

my hope is cassel is a stop gap and we finally draft a qb that plays more than 3 years

It's a prolific list of shit and a major piece of evidence for why this franchise has become a punchline.

RippedmyFlesh 01-10-2010 08:56 PM

Mike Livingston was prob the best qb ever drafted. Kenney played more but livingston contrbited to the only ring. He did the job when we needed it.

DaWolf 01-10-2010 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6432954)
Kevin Kietzman is generally a dumbass, so use this as the preface to my comment. However...

For years he's said that if you don't have a franchise QB and you're in the position to draft the player who is regarded as the best or second best QB in the draft, you absolutely have to do it.

Can't say I disagree.

You don't have to do it. The Texans certainly didn't have to draft David Carr, and the Niners certainly didn't have to draft Alex Smith, and they'd have probably been better for it. It's not always a slam dunk...

BossChief 01-10-2010 09:10 PM

Aaron Rodgers is a big reason I wanted Orakpo in the draft.

Let me explain.

Back in 2005, I wanted no part of Rodgers because he was a cal QB and because of the fact Kyle Boller failed so badly coming out of Cal, I thought Aaron would follow that model and not be prepared enough to play in the NFL and we could help the team better in going in a different direction. Mainly by taking the highest rated defender on the board.

I loved the DJ pick like everyone else.

Boy was I wrong. Crow has been served long ago on the topic.

I think many people didn't want to draft Orakpo because of the school he came out of and the fact that Vernon Gholsten had just been taken that high and looked to be a huge bust. Orakpo had the production, the elite measureables and other indicators that he is more than a workout warrior, that he could truly be a elite pass rusher at the next level but doubt remained none the less.

doubt = risk

risk = possible loss

Im more of a gambler than Pioli is obviously. I could see how much a difference a elite pass rusher could make by the difference in the teams defensive quality overall with and without Jared, so to me it was worth the risk.

milkman 01-10-2010 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 6433026)
You don't have to do it. The Texans certainly didn't have to draft David Carr, and the Niners certainly didn't have to draft Alex Smith, and they'd have probably been better for it. It's not always a slam dunk...

I think both Carr and Smith were reaches, and certainly not in the same class as a gut like Matt Stafford.

Does that mean that Stafford will pan out?

No.

But I don't believe you should reach for a QB that high simply because he's the best in an otherwise bad class.

Though I thought that Rogers was the best in that badd class that Smith came out in.

DeezNutz 01-10-2010 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 6433026)
You don't have to do it. The Texans certainly didn't have to draft David Carr, and the Niners certainly didn't have to draft Alex Smith, and they'd have probably been better for it. It's not always a slam dunk...

You have to factor in some common sense.

Vince Young might have been one of the top 2 QBs in that class, but I don't touch him with a 10-foot pole.

Kids with poor mechanics or coming from spread offenses should almost immediately be crossed off the list, barring extenuating reasons (see: athletic freak of nature).

The Bad Guy 01-10-2010 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6433039)
Aaron Rodgers is a big reason I wanted Orakpo in the draft.

Let me explain.

Back in 2005, I wanted no part of Rodgers because he was a cal QB and because of the fact Kyle Boller failed so badly coming out of Cal, I thought Aaron would follow that model and not be prepared enough to play in the NFL and we could help the team better in going in a different direction. Mainly by taking the highest rated defender on the board.

I loved the DJ pick like everyone else.

Boy was I wrong. Crow has been served long ago on the topic.

I think many people didn't want to draft Orakpo because of the school he came out of and the fact that Vernon Gholsten had just been taken that high and looked to be a huge bust. Orakpo had the production, the elite measureables and other indicators that he is more than a workout warrior, that he could truly be a elite pass rusher at the next level but doubt remained none the less.

doubt = risk

risk = possible loss

Im more of a gambler than Pioli is obviously. I could see how much a difference a elite pass rusher could make by the difference in the teams defensive quality overall with and without Jared, so to me it was worth the risk.

So basically if you want heads, you pick tails?

Mecca 01-10-2010 09:20 PM

That post doesn't make much sense, explain how Texas has had SO MANY guys fail then?

Texas players are a risk just because of that program they come from.

The_Doctor10 01-10-2010 09:21 PM

Look at it this way: Rodgers spent three years learning under statistically the greatest QB in NFL history. And Favre didn't go out of his way to make things easy; he said when Rodgers was drafted 'I'm not here to babysit Aaron Rodgers'. He made #12 work for his respect, and over the course of three years, it was earned. He received excellent coaching during those three years when he only played a handful of snaps, and wasn't rushed into a situation he wasn't ready for.

Who was he going to learn from in KC? Nobody. He was going to be thrown into the fire at the first available opportunity without the coaching staff correcting the mechanical issues he had coming out of Cal. And then he'd be just as big a disappointment as Alex Smith, if not more so.

Basileus777 01-10-2010 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6433056)
You have to factor in some common sense.

Vince Young might have been one of the top 2 QBs in that class, but I don't touch him with a 10-foot pole.

Kids with poor mechanics or coming from spread offenses should almost immediately be crossed off the list, barring extenuating reasons (see: athletic freak of nature).

This post is kind of ironic given that Rodgers fell in the draft in part due to his association with Jeff Tedford.

If anything, Rodgers is proof that those kind of stereotypes aren't always right.

RippedmyFlesh 01-10-2010 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6433055)
I think both Carr and Smith were reaches, and certainly not in the same class as a gut like Matt Stafford.

Does that mean that Stafford will pan out?

No.

But I don't believe you should reach for a QB that high simply because he's the best in an otherwise bad class.

Though I thought that Rogers was the best in that badd class that Smith came out in.

To me that's why you take the best qb if you can if ending up with rodgers in a "bad' year" sign me up.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.