I think you're wrong but it would be a much better match up.

You're just BEGGING someone to ask about your avatar again, aren't you?

I was thinking snow blower but that works as well.

It looks like Charlie Runkel on Californication

Flordia's spread vs. USC defense would be awesome to see.

ROFL

I just gave you positive rep, and you had to go and make me guffaw. stop it.

It would basically be the matchup of pro style vs college style.

That is who it is. I knew it reminded me of some tv show.

uhhhh... while i would tend to agree that USC would probably be able to beat anyone in the country right now... you're going a little overboard with this whole "big 12 is a bunch of gays" thing...

... if texas and OU both win, you're not going to find too many college football people that say the big 12 wasn't the best conference in america. pac-10 going 5-0 or not... so you might wanna relax with these jabs on the big 12 until they actually screw it up (which is very probable)

oh, and if you truly think that texas tech and oklahoma state are teams that "aren't worth a shit", then you don't know college football

What are the odds Sanchez is #1 overall next season?

That's the major holdup, I would imagine. As long as Sanchez doesn't shit down his leg next year, he's the consensus #1 overall.

This year, it's going to be hard to upend Stafford. Hell many teams out there may prefer Bradford, as well.

that's just the problem though. there have been guys who were 'consensus' top overall picks 'for next year' who didn't even go in the top three rounds the next year. it's sooooooo easy to fall off (not that I'm saying sanchez will, but you never know)

I don't see that at all, especially the part about Bradford.

I think Bradford is a creation of the internet geeks that wouldn't know how to evaluate a QB if their life depended on it.

I have a hard time believing that a NFL team would prefer a kid that they will have to TEACH how to play in a pro offense - instead of taking one of the two that have already proven they can, and excel at it.

you DO remember that the lions have the top overall pick, yes?

True or false:

Teams have made lousy decisions with Top 5 picks before.

Great minds.

Yeah, but Millen is gone. Gotta give them the benefit of the doubt until the new regime proves otherwise.

I don't surf, but I would like to hang at the beach from the afternoon through the night.
Maybe hang out at the Boardwalk and watch the world go by for a while. I'd be in 9er's country, so no major rival bullshit to deal with. I've heard San Diego is great, but there's NO ****ing way I'm gonna' live amongst the Sparkler Faithful.

I think Bradford could do well in an Air Coryell or WCO system. He reminds me alot of Trent Green. Not a franchise QB but the next tier down.

My view is Bradford is the one with the most to lose, he loses nearly his entire offense while SC and UGA should improve offensively next year so all of this could be interesting on who comes out.

And Crabtree is available

I've been to whale's vagina a few times (the wife has family who lives there)--it's ****ing beautiful. we gotta go down there again for another visit here soon, if nothing else than to enjoy that freakish weather and atmosphere. it's just quite possibly the nicest city in america.

Uh, you missed the entire point, ****tard.

****ing n00bs.

DON'T YOU DARE ****ING JINX IT!

True.

But when is the last time there were THREE QB's that could potentially go Top 5?

They have a 66% chance of choosing wisely, provided they all declare.

Thats the percent you will get a Pro Bowl QB with a top 5 pick as well.

hmmmmm.... 1999 comes to mind, but that's a depressing thought--couch and akili smith BOTH bombed out, and donovan mcnabb is the only one that hit.

then what the **** was your point? you've been trashin the big 12 throughout this whole thread...

please, dazzle me with "the point"

Akili Smith :eek:

I don't wish that upon any franchise, except maybe Denver or Oakland.

Go **** yourself, ****.

If you can't read, I can't explain it to you.

Dumbshit.

So who takes over at USC - I know Mustain is 3rd string, the backup cant think of his name but he was a 5 or 4 star recruit, or Barkley?

heh, mustain is the third string? ROFL

jesus. for being so highly touted, you'd assume he'd be the heir apparent. he ain't getting any younger.......

Hopefully, we'll have someone in charge that is competent enough to make that decision.

i just told you that i read the thread...

you're such a ****ing child

heh, you should tell him how much music you illegally pirate next. that'll help your cause :p

No, you're a ****ing moron.

I said that USC would beat any team in the Big 12 this season. How is that "bashing" the Big 12? Who the **** are you, crybaby? The commissioner of the Big 12?

Missouri barely beat Northwestern in overtime. That's impressive?
Nebraska barely won. Impressive?
Kansas beat ****ing Minnesota. Impressive?
Texas Tech lost. Impressive?

JFC.

Texas should beat OSU handily.

OU will lose.

Happy now, ****face?

Yeah, that's right.

I'll take that spatula and stick it so far up his n00b ass he'll never come back.

Mitch Mustain and Aaron Corp are the backups and the odds of Barkley playing right away are slim to none.

well it seemed like you were getting a little enamored with the pac-10's success this bowl season...

once you started making jabs at OU's schedule, (which is apparently chalked full of cup-cakes according to you)... i'm going to take it as you saying that the big 12 is weak... and that is just patently wrong

and if OU beats florida by more than a touchdown, then i say they could give USC all that they could handle, and even beat the mother ****ers

so what the hell is up with mitch mustain? he couldn't beat out casey dick, and he doesn't have much longer in college (isn't he running out of eligibility soon?)--what are his chances of starting next year?

Let's bank on Detroit's ongoing lack of focus, draft mojo, and the cluster**** that IS Ford family ownership; I do believe we'll come out on top.

The Rams may try to get stupid with us, but I bet they try to get stupid with Detroit first.

He joined Megadeath.

So you're going to tell me that Chattanooga, Baylor, A&M and K-State are top notch competition? Really? If so, please, go on!

Additionally, pointing out that Oklahoma played a "cupcake" schedule isn't bashing the Big 12: It's a fact.

I'm sorry that your vag was wounded by the appearance of factual information.

I'm going to save you some misery. College football at The Planet is like science lab; it's a clinical affair, and there is NO God(Rah-Rah)on the menu.

If you come to the topic of College Football at The Planet like Jethro Bodean in the big fur coat and little "state" flag, you will get butt-hurt.

He's considered a RS soph right now so he has 2 more years.

I don't know who they are. are they related to megadeth?

point is, if he doesn't start next year, he'll have wasted three prime years of possible start-time on the bench.

oklahoma playing a cup-cake schedule is ****ing FACTUAL?! according to who? you're delusional...

USC played washington, washington state, stanford... those teams are right on par with the kstate's, a&m's, and baylor's of the world..

they played notre dame, who is without a ****ing shadow of a doubt worse than Cincinnati or TCU.

Oh btw, the fact that you think that the big east conference champions are a team that "isn't worth a shit" just adds to the fact that you are just reaching with this whole thing..

add all that up and oklahoma played a schedule that could easily be argued was tougher than USC...

you're honestly just making yourself look bad

ROFL Goddamnit; I knew I was spelling that wrong at the time, but I was too lazy to fact check.

ROFL

Jesus Christ; I bet those ass-pirates win the division and go to the dance. Who's left to stop them?

Aaaaaand, he doesn't listen. Well, good luck Chum. And by "Chum" I DO mean shark-food.

Thank you, DCS.

holy shit..... i just looked it up and oklahoma is NUMBER ****ING 1 in strength of schedule...

eat crow right now mother ****er.... CUP CAKE SCHEDULE? you've lost all credibility

here's the link.... i win.... you lose... good night

http://www.sportsline.com/collegefootball/polls/119

Cincinnati lost to #20 Va Tech.

Whew! I'm glad that USC didn't fact Va. Tech!

reeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaching

for ****'s sake.... USC's SOS is 67!!!!!!!!1 SIXTY mother ****ing SEVEN

You do understand OU's schedule strength is overblown because of the ludicrously high rankings of teams like Oklahoma state right?

No, he can't understand.

His reerun gene is rated too high.

You never go full reerun.

I'm afraid he's going to have to work his way up to "Beaker" in The Planet College Football Science Lab, and it could prove to be a hard climb indeed.

you're basing that off of the holiday bowl, right?

before dez bryant got hurt, ok state was the better team... they were working oregon... but they deflated after he went down, and zac robinson went into total panic mode.... what would have happened if bryant never would have went down? without that shift in momentum the cowboys very well could have won that game...

then the pac 10 and big 12 would both be 4-1 right now and we wouldn't even be having this conversation....

so i don't buy the fact that ok state was ranked "ludicrously" high...

Too late for the spatula

i'm forgetting which one of us claimed that the team with the #1 SOS in the entire ****ing nation played the cupcake schedule....

All of the Big 12 teams are overrated due to perception of before the year started...

No one can realistically tell me that OK State, Texas Tech, Missouri those teams who were all in the top 10 at some point this year were that good, perception played out all year just the same as the "pac 10 sucks" perception did.

Oregon State had a nice year and people make fun of them, Tech and Ok State had nice years and people act like they're great.

What I'm NOT forgetting is that you're a 21 year-old, Big 12 loving, myopic douche-nozzle.

Let's just see how many of your beloved Big 12 teams finish with bowl wins this year.

Feel the love. LMAO

that's exactly what i said in my original post... the big 12 has a chance to win 5... just like the pac 10... god damn it man

dude... he called it a cupcake schedule.... seriously...

am i just supposed to sit idly by?

ROFL

I'd like to interrupt this thread to point out USC can lick my balls.

The big-12 IS over-rated. That said, they are a hell of a lot better than the Pac-10. OMG.

they should eat more



do you ever surf?

Lol. Dave's brother?

His Big 12 'homerism' is no different than your USC/PAC 10 homerism. He brings up some good points/arguments and all you can do is attack him personally. :rolleyes: Look Dane, I know it is hard for you to try to not be an arrogant prick. But just once, perhaps you could try.

Utah should be the national champ

ROFL


What would they call a Championship between OK. and Utah?

The "Thank God We Get To Leave Utah and Oklahoma, If Only Temporarily"-Bowl.

Then as usual, you didn't read the whole thread.

What else is new?

:shake:

I agree, even though the Big 12 may be overrated, it was FAR from a cupcake schedule. To be honest, you could take almost any team and make an argument that they played some weak competition, or that "well they lost to that team".

They are still ranked 1st in SOS, so if anything is reeruned on here, I would say it is the "cupcake" comment.

YOU called it a "cupcake" schedule.

Again, is the Big 12 commissioner your DAD or something? Why the **** do you care so much about what I think?

USC has been dominant this year. Their defense may have as many as 10 guys drafted. I'm not even a USC fan. My wife graduated from UCLA and I spoke to Rick Nueheisel on the day before Christmas Eve about their program. So get the **** off of it, Dude.

The bottom line is that USC would beat any team in the nation right now, bar none.

And that includes Oklahoma and Texas.

But...but...no one can beat Boob Douche.:rolleyes:

FYP, you homer.

I guess that didn't work out for them after the 2005 season, though.

Uh, I'm not a homer.

But I guess that's just something you'd label me after reading one positive USC thread in 8 years. Because well, you're just so smart like that.

:rolleyes: