ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Whitlocks Gambling advice: Take the Browns minus-2 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=233600)

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2010 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 7011443)
Malcolm Floyd was WIDE open in the end zone on that 4th and Goal. He just slipped. The weather was a huge part of the game

It was a busted play. Floyd was running a crossing pattern across the back of the end zone. Flowers was with him step for step. It was great coverage all around. Rivers threw the ball behind Floyd, hoping that he could get back to it. He and flowers both slipped in the mess. And, Rivers had Dorsey breathing down his neck.

Floyd wasn't wide open. If you don't watch him the entire route and you just see him when the ball is in the air, then you might get that impression. But, he and Flowers both slipped. And, Rivers also had to get the ball over the linebackers and a crossing safety. Chiefs defense played that well.

wutamess 09-17-2010 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 7011604)
It was a busted play. Floyd was running a crossing pattern across the back of the end zone. Flowers was with him step for step. It was great coverage all around. Rivers threw the ball behind Floyd, hoping that he could get back to it. He and flowers both slipped in the mess. And, Rivers had Dorsey breathing down his neck.

Floyd wasn't wide open. If you don't watch him the entire route and you just see him when the ball is in the air, then you might get that impression. But, he and Flowers both slipped. And, Rivers also had to get the ball over the linebackers and a crossing safety. Chiefs defense played that well.

This. :clap:

Messier 09-17-2010 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 7011443)
Malcolm Floyd was WIDE open in the end zone on that 4th and Goal. He just slipped. The weather was a huge part of the game

No, he wasn't.

L.A. Chieffan 09-17-2010 09:39 AM

Ok, sure. Id call a guy whos standin there by himself with no defender in the area that that ball is thrown to and having his body turned in that direction but just couldnt get it because he slipped, wide open

Messier 09-17-2010 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 7011785)
Ok, sure. Id call a guy whos standin there by himself with no defender in the area that that ball is thrown to and having his body turned in that direction but just couldnt get it because he slipped, wide open

Look again. He was trying to reverse field because he was covered.

notorious 09-17-2010 03:52 PM

Wide open. LOL


Is that why there were no less then 3 defenders between Floyd and Rivers?


TIVO is your friend.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2010 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 7011785)
Ok, sure. Id call a guy whos standin there by himself with no defender in the area that that ball is thrown to and having his body turned in that direction but just couldnt get it because he slipped, wide open

Did you actually watch the game, or some slide show highlight real?

milkman 09-17-2010 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 7012781)
Did you actually watch the game, or some slide show highlight real?

I may be wrong, but I think he was being sarcastic.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2010 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7012824)
I may be wrong, but I think he was being sarcastic.

I hope so.

bishop_74 09-17-2010 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 7011785)
Ok, sure. Id call a guy whos standin there by himself with no defender in the area that that ball is thrown to and having his body turned in that direction but just couldnt get it because he slipped, wide open

From the side of the field it looked that way, but the replay from behind Rivers showed multiple defenders in between causing Rivers to throw wide.

Blankey 09-19-2010 02:24 PM

I just lost my life savings because of that fatass

dirk digler 09-19-2010 02:28 PM

Fatass strikes out again.

crazychiefsfan 09-19-2010 02:35 PM

Fatlock he's a fatty

KCwolf 09-19-2010 02:36 PM

Hey Tubby..... U Lose

chiefsnorth 09-19-2010 02:38 PM

Sitck to telling the counter girl at Gates what you will "take"

Coach 09-19-2010 03:32 PM

Stay out of the gambling business, fat-ass.
Posted via Mobile Device

Renegade 09-19-2010 03:45 PM

So if the Vegas Line was -2, does that mean if you bet either team you lose? I can never figure out the Vegas line, and that is why I don't bet it.

Shogun 09-19-2010 03:46 PM

TALK SHIT NOW

SenselessChiefsFan 09-19-2010 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Renegade (Post 7019495)
So if the Vegas Line was -2, does that mean if you bet either team you lose? I can never figure out the Vegas line, and that is why I don't bet it.

If the line is the Browns minus two, that means, that if you bet on the Browns they have to win by more than two points.

If you bet on the Chiefs, the Chiefs would have to lose by less than two points. Betting the Chiefs would have won the game today.

Now, had the scores been reversed, it would have been a 'push', which is neither a win or loss.

Ming the Merciless 09-19-2010 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Renegade (Post 7019495)
So if the Vegas Line was -2, does that mean if you bet either team you lose? I can never figure out the Vegas line, and that is why I don't bet it.

If you bet on a team -2 you have to subtract 2 points from their final score.

If you bet on a team +2 you get to add 2 points to their final score.

Saul Good 09-19-2010 08:04 PM

I'm starting to really like our chances against SF. They have a short week, and the noon start is like 10:00 AM for them. Arrowhead is going to be rocking again just like it was back in the day, and SF is one of the only teams in the league with a QB as bad as ours.

3-0 is a very real possibility.

baitism 09-19-2010 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7020298)
I'm starting to really like our chances against SF. They have a short week, and the noon start is like 10:00 AM for them. Arrowhead is going to be rocking again just like it was back in the day, and SF is one of the only teams in the league with a QB as bad as ours.

3-0 is a very real possibility.

I sure hope so, because our two games after the bye are brutal.

BIG_DADDY 09-19-2010 11:05 PM

Good call Jason. Oh well, there's always the buffet.

crazycoffey 09-19-2010 11:23 PM

bwaaahhhhaaaahahhahahaaaaa

Wreckloose 09-19-2010 11:31 PM

"Seneca Wallace starting 4 Browns. Chiefs luckiest team in America. U gotta love Chiefs +3. U gotta love Chiefs on ML."

From his twitter.

Hammock Parties 10-01-2010 09:04 PM

Whitlock owned.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.