ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs McCluster definitely moving to RB full-time (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=244416)

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7595581)
he's a midget without a position....that's what we got for the #36 pick

last year you dumbasses were claiming he was Wes Welker and making the whole board apologize to him....now you've abandoned the Welker myth and latched on to something called - and jesus this is stupid - "Slash and Dash"...

I recall him being compared to Percy Harvin and DeSean Jackson as well.

mcaj22 04-27-2011 12:04 PM

I watched this guy get shit on in the open field by both Ray Lewis and Ed Reed. He's not ready to run in between NFL tackles.

sadly, he will never live up to that 36 spot.

BigMeatballDave 04-27-2011 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 7595620)
I watched this guy get shit on in the open field by both Ray Lewis and Ed Reed. He's not ready to run in between NFL tackles.

sadly, he will never live up to that 36 spot.

:rolleyes: Yeah, because those 2 guys are lousy players who never hit anyone.

HotRoute 04-27-2011 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 7595583)
This !!! He's a playmaker and needs to get touches. He may be as good as Charles .

:popcorn:

DaKCMan AP 04-27-2011 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 7595620)
I watched this guy get shit on in the open field by both Ray Lewis and Ed Reed. He's not ready to run in between NFL tackles.

sadly, he will never live up to that 36 spot.

He got trucked by two future hall of fame, all-decade players? BUST!

DBOSHO 04-27-2011 12:17 PM

Everybody here has the dane syndrome, where they are so sure of a player after 16 games that they know the players ceiling.

kysirsoze 04-27-2011 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 7595170)
Don't believe anything the week before the draft.

Rumor could be true, or it could be a smokescreen to make other teams think KC has a bigger need for WR and/or smaller need for a RB.


This should have ended this thread on the first page.

How the **** does a Bob Gretz report translate to "definitely" anything? I've not been happy with the use of Dex, but he is a player with a lot of talent that I hope we are able to exploit. Whatever they are, Haley obviously has plans for him. This discussion should be tabled until at least week five or six. Anything sooner is almost as speculative as the report this thread is based on.

Instead we will get at least 20 more threads between now and then either blindly defending or brutally bashing that one pick. I guess that's just Chiefsplanet.

BigCatDaddy 04-27-2011 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 7595660)
Everybody here has the dane syndrome, where they are so sure of a player after 16 games that they know the players ceiling.

Actually nobody gave him that many games.

keg in kc 04-27-2011 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 7595677)
Actually nobody gave him that many games.

And it was never limited to dane.

kysirsoze 04-27-2011 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 7595620)
I watched this guy get shit on in the open field by both Ray Lewis and Ed Reed. He's not ready to run in between NFL tackles.

sadly, he will never live up to that 36 spot.

You watched that? Hey, guys. This guy has first hand evidence that a rookie RB/WR got beat down by two HoFers. How can he ever live up to a high second round pick if he can't immediately clown two of the best defensive players of the last decade??

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7595600)
Clay-

I went back looking for the Selvie play, and it's a return. Not sure when, sorry.

Hope that helps.

McCluster got run down by a guy who outweighed him by 80 lbs.

http://i54.tinypic.com/4r54zk.jpg

kysirsoze 04-27-2011 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595740)
McCluster got run down by a guy who outweighed him by 80 lbs.

http://i54.tinypic.com/4r54zk.jpg

Run down? WTH are you talking about?

DaKCMan AP 04-27-2011 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 7595743)
Run down? WTH are you talking about?

He doesn't have a clue and isn't worth your time.

BigMeatballDave 04-27-2011 12:43 PM

LMAO The Dex hate is hilarious.

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595740)
McCluster got run down by a guy who outweighed him by 80 lbs.

http://i54.tinypic.com/4r54zk.jpg

That's some mighty fine elusiveness there, Dex.

keg in kc 04-27-2011 12:45 PM

Wait, you're characterizing that as getting run down from behind? The guy comes in unblocked with the angle, with a guy (who is that Demorrio Williams?) staggering along behind with an awesome "aw shit I done ****ed up" gait.

DJ's left nut 04-27-2011 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7595748)
LMAO The Dex hate is hilarious.

And "Slash and Dash" is just sad.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 7595743)
Run down? WTH are you talking about?

I dunno, McCluster couldn't put a move on the guy? He just sort of kept running and let the guy pull him down. Where's the speed?

BigMeatballDave 04-27-2011 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595740)
McCluster got run down by a guy who outweighed him by 80 lbs.

http://i54.tinypic.com/4r54zk.jpg

Heh. Run down. Looks like Selvie took a good angle and made a nice open-field tackle.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7595763)
Wait, you're characterizing that as getting run down from behind?

I didn't say "behind," I said run down.

It's not quite as bad as I imagined but McCluster shows 0 elusiveness on that play...and 0 speed.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7595776)
Heh. Run down. Looks like Selvie took a good angle and made a nice open-field tackle.

Yep, no reason the scatback should attempt to put a move on a 250-pound linebacker at all.

Fish 04-27-2011 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7595776)
Heh. Run down. Looks like Selvie took a good angle and made a nice open-field tackle.

Well hopefully once Dex is moved to RB, nobody on the opposing defense will take any good angles or anything.

sedated 04-27-2011 12:49 PM

Had Copper made the right block, Dex could have gotten into the open field.

Its also nice to see 2 linemen tag-teaming one defender.

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595782)
Yep, no reason the scatback should attempt to put a move on a 250-pound linebacker* at all.

*That runs a 4.93 40.

kysirsoze 04-27-2011 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595782)
Yep, no reason the scatback should attempt to put a move on a 250-pound linebacker at all.

Dex was looking to the blocks being set up to the outside and this dude flew through untouched. Maybe Barry Sanders could have salvaged that busted ass play. MAYBE. This play is a terrible argument against McCluster.

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 7595785)
Well hopefully once Dex is moved to RB, nobody on the opposing defense will take any good angles or anything.

LMAO

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 12:51 PM

One play doesn't really matter anyway. I could put together a lowlight reel of this guy getting caught in the open field. Again...and again...and again.

kysirsoze 04-27-2011 12:52 PM

The better question is WTF was Copper going?

BigMeatballDave 04-27-2011 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595782)
Yep, no reason the scatback should attempt to put a move on a 250-pound linebacker at all.

Dont you think its possible that Dex never saw Selvie?

keg in kc 04-27-2011 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595779)
I didn't say "behind," I said run down.

It's not quite as bad as I imagined but McCluster shows 0 elusiveness on that play...and 0 speed.

Sometimes defenders make plays. It's shocking I know.

If you're looking for highlights to showcase the holes in McCluster's game, that's the wrong one. That's a missed block and an easy play for Selvie. McCluster had no chance. Dante Hall wouldn't have gotten out of that one. Or any other returner you want to name.

(Of course, if it had been Dante Hall, it would have been Gary Stills (IIRC) blocking Selvie and not Williams, so he might have gotten a return out of it after all. Although out of fairness to Williams, maybe somebody else missed an assignment off camera.)

Team game, man.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7595803)
Dont you think its possible that Dex never saw Selvie?

Yeah, his field vision sucks.

Chiefnj2 04-27-2011 12:53 PM

Heavier players should never be able to tackle lighter players. /ChiefsPlanet.

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595796)
One play doesn't really matter anyway. I could put together a lowlight reel of this guy getting caught in the open field. Again...and again...and again.

Yep.

This was just the example that came to my head.

A 170 pound scatback that is supposedly "elusive" should never get pulled down in the open field by a LB that outweighs him by 80 pounds and runs a 4.93 40.

kysirsoze 04-27-2011 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595806)
Yeah, his field vision sucks.

:facepalm:

Titty Meat 04-27-2011 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 7595176)
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Hb-chWh64Dc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Good god that song to the video was just awful!

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7595804)
Sometimes defenders make plays. It's shocking I know.

If you're looking for highlights to showcase the holes in McCluster's game, that's the wrong one. That's a missed block and an easy play for Selvie. McCluster had no chance. Dante Hall wouldn't have gotten out of that one. Or any other returner you want to name.

(Of course, if it had been Dante Hall, it would have been Gary Stills (IIRC) blocking Selvie and not Williams, so he might have gotten a return out of it after all.)

Team game, man.

I'd expect that from others, but am shocked you'd say something this ridiculous.

Open field tackles are FAR from easy in this league. Guys miss open field tackles easier than this every week.

This isn't like the clip where Dex catches the ball and Samuel or Reed is RIGHT THERE. That's having no chance.

Bottom line, Dex shows no speed and no field vision on the play. Open field against a guy 80 pounds heavier who runs a 4.93? Dex should win that matchup every time.

BigMeatballDave 04-27-2011 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595779)
I didn't say "behind," I said run down.

LMAO WTF do you think 'run down' means?

How many players get 'run down' head-on?

Titty Meat 04-27-2011 01:04 PM

What about the play where he scores vs the Niners?

keg in kc 04-27-2011 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7595830)
I'd expect that from others, but am shocked you'd say something this ridiculous.

Open field tackles are FAR from easy in this league. Guys miss open field tackles easier than this every week.

It's not ridiculous. It was a good defensive play. It happens. And you can hype Selvie's 40 time all you want, but that was a good burst of speed he showed there through the hole.

clay could probably find a hundred other McCluster highlights to outline exactly how elusive he was not last year. God knows there were plenty of them, the number of times he was taken down. He just happened to pick the wrong one.

BigMeatballDave 04-27-2011 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7595830)
I'd expect that from others, but am shocked you'd say something this ridiculous.

Open field tackles are FAR from easy in this league. Guys miss open field tackles easier than this every week.

This isn't like the clip where Dex catches the ball and Samuel or Reed is RIGHT THERE. That's having no chance.

Bottom line, Dex shows no speed and no field vision on the play. Open field against a guy 80 pounds heavier who runs a 4.93? Dex should win that matchup every time.

Its entirely possible you are over-reacting to this.

I dont know what Dex will be. The potential is there. We'll see. You guys, however, are looking for anything and everything to prove he'll bust.

Yeah, I'm giving the guy the benefit of the doubt, he's a 2nd yr player.

Chiefnj2 04-27-2011 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7595813)
Yep.

This was just the example that came to my head.

A 170 pound scatback that is supposedly "elusive" should never get pulled down in the open field by a LB that outweighs him by 80 pounds and runs a 4.93 40.

Do you realize that in the game of football there are 20 other players on the field that may have some affect on where that scatback can move?

In your NFL a 140lb elusive person would never get tackled because all defenders would outweigh him by 50 plus pounds.

Rausch 04-27-2011 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7595776)
Heh. Run down. Looks like Selvie took a good angle and made a nice open-field tackle.

This...

WV 04-27-2011 01:07 PM

He's going to get broke the **** up.

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7595850)
Its entirely possible you are over-reacting to this.

I dont know what Dex will be. The potential is there. We'll see. You guys, however, are looking for anything and everything to prove he'll bust.

Yeah, I'm giving the guy the benefit of the doubt, he's a 2nd yr player.

You keep using the word bust.

I haven't used it. DJ'sLeftNut said it well earlier, and most of you guys chose to overlook it.

Quote:

When the pick was made, it was panned by many as a stupid luxury pick for a team that had pressing issues at NT, LB, QB and yes, WR. Instead we took a gimmicky scat-back that likely couldn't stay healthy who would struggle to find a regular role in the offense. We were informed that he was clearly going to be the #3 WR the team desperately needed (and that someone like Benn or Williams would be nowhere near as good as the elusive midget).

16 NFL regular season games and 1 post-season game later he has shown to be a guy that couldn't stay healthy and who we couldn't find a regular role in the offense. It also appears increasingly likely that he isn't going to be the #3 WR and most assuredly won't be better than most of the WRs taken after him.

It's not a knee-jerk reaction, it's a vindication. Those of us that hated this pick from the moment it was made have been right across the board. If you need to call it a knee-jerk reaction in order to make yourself feel better, so be it. But there's nothing knee-jerk about this; the angst over this pick has been a long time coming.
So far, he's proven the people that hated the pick right.

He has time to prove those of us wrong, as well.

But as of 4/27/2011, it's been a pretty piss-poor pick, considering.

keg in kc 04-27-2011 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WVChiefFan (Post 7595855)
He's going to get broke the **** up.

Been my concern all along.

And precisely why I don't want to see him spending too much time at RB and getting wailed-on by LBs.

Marcellus 04-27-2011 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7595850)
Its entirely possible you are over-reacting to this.

I dont know what Dex will be. The potential is there. We'll see. You guys, however, are looking for anything and everything to prove he'll bust.

Yeah, I'm giving the guy the benefit of the doubt, he's a 2nd yr player.

You mean that 16 games is not enough to evaluate the full potential of a player and his NFL career?

Players can get better in year 2 and beyond?

I say just cut his ass now and lets not waste the time.


For the record, he needs make an impact this year or yea, bad pick.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7595804)
If you're looking for highlights to showcase the holes in McCluster's game, that's the wrong one.

OTWP brought it up.

Anyway, here's some more stellar elusiveness. On a play designed for McCluster to make a guy miss, no less...

http://i.imgur.com/Hq5z4.gif

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 7595882)
You mean that 16 games is not enough to evaluate the full potential of a player and his NFL career?

Players can get better in year 2 and beyond?

I say just cut his ass now and lets not waste the time.

Who here has said he can't get better?

I'll wait.

How about those of you that hated the pick on draft day because he was listed as a RB - and have since rationalized the pick because he was going to play the slot - but continue to rationalize the pick now that he's being moved to RB full time - help Marcellus out.

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan 04-27-2011 01:19 PM

I think Pestilence ought to explain how he got "definitely moving to running back" out of the snipped he posted.

hinted =! definitely moving

Very misleading title that skewed the tenor of the conversation from the start.

ToxSocks 04-27-2011 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595779)
I didn't say "behind," I said run down.

It's not quite as bad as I imagined but McCluster shows 0 elusiveness on that play...and 0 speed.

It's called an angle. You know, sometimes defenders are trained to take proper angles to compensate for lack of speed.

I'm sure you can find plenty of plays of Charles that look just look just like that. But he's not fast or elusive or anything......

This thread is becoming comical.

GC, you're trying way to hard to be a hater.

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595895)
OTWP brought it up.

Anyway, here's some more stellar elusiveness. On a play designed for McCluster to make a guy miss, no less...

http://i.imgur.com/Hq5z4.gif

We all know where this is leading.

Any time Dex gets taken down in the open field, it was a good defensive play.

Any time a defender slips, takes a bad angle, etc - Dex is elusive.

kysirsoze 04-27-2011 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 7595897)
I think Pestilence ought to explain how he got "definitely moving to running back" out of the snipped he posted.

hinted =! definitely moving

Very misleading title that skewed the tenor of the conversation from the start.

It's no use. The train has left the station.

BigCatDaddy 04-27-2011 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7595908)
It's called an angle. You know, sometimes defenders are trained to take proper angles to compensate for lack of speed.

I'm sure you can find plenty of plays of Charles that look just look just like that. But he's not fast or elusive or anything......

This thread is becoming comical.

GC, you're trying way to hard to be a hater.

I don't remember which game it was but JC did get "ran down" by a safety in the open field.

JC = Suckage

kysirsoze 04-27-2011 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595895)
OTWP brought it up.

Anyway, here's some more stellar elusiveness. On a play designed for McCluster to make a guy miss, no less...

http://i.imgur.com/Hq5z4.gif

Now THAT is a bad play by Dex. Much better example.

ToxSocks 04-27-2011 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595895)
OTWP brought it up.

Anyway, here's some more stellar elusiveness. On a play designed for McCluster to make a guy miss, no less...

http://i.imgur.com/Hq5z4.gif

Just stop. You can find plays like that for any player. It does not prove shit.

DeezNutz 04-27-2011 01:24 PM

I'm going to blow into a shoe in honor of DMC. Blow out a shoe, I mean.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7595908)

GC, you're trying way to hard to be a hater.

OTWP wanted to see the play, I posted it. I don't agree that it's an awful play but Dex certainly shows he's nothing special there. He just keeps running...no attempt to cut back whatsoever and avoid the man.

Saccopoo 04-27-2011 01:25 PM

I wonder if this is the precursor to us moving up in the first round and picking Julio Jones?

Getting the constituency prepared for the coming of Jesus as a receiver, so to speak.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_JGdhsJ5zeK...ulio+Jones.jpg

ToxSocks 04-27-2011 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7595909)
We all know where this is leading.

Any time Dex gets taken down in the open field, it was a good defensive play.

Any time a defender slips, takes a bad angle, etc - Dex is elusive.

No.

It was a bad play by Dex. But if we had the kinda time GC has, we can find bad plays by just about any player. It's moot.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7595917)
Just stop. You can find plays like that for any player. It does not prove shit.

The burden of proof is not on McCluster haters. He did basically nothing last year.

That play is a good example of how he's nothing special in the open field, though. Happened all year long.

keg in kc 04-27-2011 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7595909)
We all know where this is leading.

Any time Dex gets taken down in the open field, it was a good defensive play.

Well, it was a pretty good defensive play, wasn't it?

But this time Dex had the chance to make a move and it was obviously the wrong one.

And that looked like that hurt.

Which is related to my injury fears with him: half the time when he gets hit, it's of the cringe-inducing variety. He just seems to nailed way too often. Injury waiting to happen.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 7595916)
Now THAT is a bad play by Dex. Much better example.

I don't think it's a BAD play as much as it is a guy not being able to be special.

Dex catches the ball and tries his best to elude the defender one-on-one. He just can't do it. Because he's not that talented.

ToxSocks 04-27-2011 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595926)
The burden of proof is not on McCluster haters. He did basically nothing last year.

That play is a good example of how he's nothing special in the open field, though. Happened all year long.

Ever think that maybe we need more than a handful of games.

You could make the same EXACT case for Charles & a handful of players in his rookie year.

kysirsoze 04-27-2011 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 7595922)
I wonder if this is the precursor to us moving up in the first round and picking Julio Jones?

Getting the constituency prepared for the coming of Jesus as a receiver, so to speak.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_JGdhsJ5zeK...ulio+Jones.jpg

Not gonna happen. That would be AWESOME, though.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7595908)
I'm sure you can find plenty of plays of Charles that look just look just like that. .

LMAO

I love that people keep bringing up Charles in comparison with McCluster...

No one will say shit about McCluster if he gains 2,000 yards from scrimmage...

Hell...500 ought to be enough.

Not happening.

Saccopoo 04-27-2011 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 7595933)
Not gonna happen. That would be AWESOME, though.

It would at that.

Sell it out Scotty!

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7595917)
Just stop. You can find plays like that for any player. It does not prove shit.

Just a guess, but if some of you ****ing flip-floppers (not necessarily you, Dtox, i have no idea what your stance on this was on draft day) didn't:

a) Hate the pick because he was listed as a RB

b) Rationalize the pick because he was moved to the slot

c) Make ridiculous claims that he's the next Wes Welker/DeSean Jackson/Percy Harvin.

d) Continue defending the pick when he's moved back to RB - which everyone hated originally. OOOH! Slash and dash!


Then maybe, this wouldn't keep popping back up.

Bottom line, SO FAR, Dexter nor the coaching staff have done anything to prove the people that hated the pick and have stuck to their opinion wrong.

If he played for any of our division rivals, most, if not all of you would be laughing at what a shitty pick it was.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7595931)
Ever think that maybe we need more than a handful of games.

No.

I don't think McCluster is going to magically get quicker, faster or bigger over the offseason.

And they're giving up on him as a WR so we don't really need to explore the idea that he might learn to run routes better.

HemiEd 04-27-2011 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7595340)
read the post...Haley described him as a 3rd down back


he's a postionless player....a gadget...the 36th pick in the draft

Pretty sad really. He did nothing to justify being picked after the first game of the season, last year.

DJ's left nut 04-27-2011 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7595917)
Just stop. You can find plays like that for any player. It does not prove shit.

Explain?

It was a perfect example in that you can put it up next to his 'elusiveness' in the college clips. There are plays he made in college where he did that little spin and got some grocery sacker to drop his jock. "WOW! What a playmaker!!"

He tried it at the NFL level and a legitimate player (not even a very good player) put him on his ass.

It's not dispositive for its result, but for the manner in which it got there. It wasn't him slipping on a cut or mis-reading a running lane. It was him in the open field making the exact kind of move that wowed the folks that were slobbing his knob a year ago and getting his shit pushed in for it.

His game doesn't translate to the NFL and that clip does a lot to show why.

ToxSocks 04-27-2011 01:33 PM

Lets see.....I can see plenty of elusiveness right here...this is w/o even trying to find good clips...

http://www.nfl.com/videos/auto/09000...rd-punt-return

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 01:33 PM

That's great, cherry pick one of the two impact plays he made last year.

Titty Meat 04-27-2011 01:33 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWldT...eature=related

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 01:34 PM

"grocery sacker" is a great derogatory term for shitty players....must use in future!

Chief Roundup 04-27-2011 01:35 PM

Wouldn't that probably give us the smallest running back duo in the league.
That also makes WR a bigger need. Not much but a bigger need.

ToxSocks 04-27-2011 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595950)
That's great, cherry pick one of the two impact plays he made last year.

I aint cherry picking shit.

It's simply the first one i found when typing his name in.

Unlike you....

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7595930)
I don't think it's a BAD play as much as it is a guy not being able to be special.

Dex catches the ball and tries his best to elude the defender one-on-one. He just can't do it. Because he's not that talented.

He's talented, he's just not overly talented in relation to the other 21 players on the field during a NFL game.

He stood out in college, where there might have been a handful of guys that have NFL-level talent. The rest are selling insurance in ****ing Mobile or Gulfport.

I just don't think he's the "special" player others do. Not in a class with Hester, DeSean Jackson, Harvin, etc. He's just another guy.

IMO, he'll be even less special as a full-time RB.

Titty Meat 04-27-2011 01:36 PM

And nobody wants to talk about the play vs the Niners or the punt return that was the game winning TD? The potential is certainly there was it worth taking a gadget player in round 2? Probably not. But he's not really a busy just yet.

BigMeatballDave 04-27-2011 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 7595952)

YOU CANT CHERRY PICK!

chiefsnorth 04-27-2011 01:36 PM

He is a gadget player, it doesn't really matter what position they list him at... His role will probably be about the same


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.