ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Fantasy Football The Mythical Ricky Stanzi (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=259064)

oldman 04-30-2012 08:40 AM

I've heard many argue that Satnzi was drafted to be a career backup. Isn't that what we have as a starter now? I'm not saying he's the next Tom Brady, but he needs to get a chance to succeed. Haley never gave him that chance. RAC was trying to get a HC job. Let's see what the kid can do in camp.

ForeverChiefs58 04-30-2012 09:00 AM

Before even starting, at this stage in both careers, Stanzi already has more highlight videos. Sad really we didn't at least give him a try over Palko.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lh3063BlVuk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

htismaqe 04-30-2012 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58 (Post 8582591)
Before even starting, at this stage in both careers, Stanzi already has more highlight videos. Sad really we didn't at least give him a try over Palko.

He was never going to play. He was told prior to the season to be prepared for it. It's the Patriot Way.

ToxSocks 04-30-2012 09:34 AM

Ah, Dick Stanzi. KC fans last hope.

tooge 04-30-2012 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8581908)
Statistically, yes. Palko and Stanzi are the same QB. And their statistics are both better than Cassel's from this preseason.

In the eye test, the two QBs aren't even comparable. Stanzi is far superior.

there is a huge difference between the two. Palko has been around a number of years in the NFL. He's been through training camps galore, seen different NFL defenses, offseasons, etc., etc, etc.
Stanzi on the other hand, didn't have an NFL offseason, had an abreviated training camp., and was probably given even less snaps than a rookie normally would, because with the lack of an offseason, the starter and second guy were going to need even more.
As far as the preseason, Haley totally tanked that. It's pretty much been established that Haley was a moron with regards to how he ran the preseason. Stanzi didn't even play in the final game and only played sparingly the other three. That is unheard of for a third stringer. Hell, even Casey Printers, Jonathan Quinn, and a slew of wanna bes got more playing time.
Stanzi hasn't gotten a fair shot yet. He will this year. IF he is good in training camp, then he'll get more time in preseason. If he blows in training camp, he might not see as much time in preseason games. Simple as that.
We (as fans) and the team still don't know what they have in Stanzi. There simply isn't any way to know yet. Four months from now, we will. Until then, anything other than "lets give him a chance and see what he has" is an invalid argument.
I hope he has "it", and can develop into a solid NFL starter. If not, I hope he can be a solid NFL backup. We shall see.

buddha 04-30-2012 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8581709)
Why? Why is this guy held in such high regard around here? I remember him leading exactly *ONE* touchdown drive of note last preseason, and really don't remember him sticking in my memory as a guy that I'd love to have on my team coming out of college.

Are we so starved for a quarterback, ANY quarterback, that we bring up through the ranks to finally break through and be THE GUY that we would put this seemingly average and nondescript player up on a pedestal? I mean, seriously, he couldn't even beat out Tyler Palko for the backup gig. Tyler. Freaking. Palko. It makes me wish I were more of a Hawkeye fan just so I could buy into the "hype" surrounding him. I haven't seen this much hopefull wishing since Casey Printers and Ted White didn't make the team.

So, sell me on this phenom named Stanzi. I dare you.

Pretty simple, there are a lot of very vocal Iowa fans on CP who think the sun rises and sets on Stanzi.

He may end up being a terrific starting QB at some point (hopefully soon), but there is nobody who could really know at this point based on what we've seen.

htismaqe 04-30-2012 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 8582733)
Pretty simple, there are a lot of very vocal Iowa fans on CP who think the sun rises and sets on Stanzi.

He may end up being a terrific starting QB at some point (hopefully soon), but there is nobody who could really know at this point based on what we've seen.

ROFL

Graystoke 04-30-2012 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 8582733)
Pretty simple, there are a lot of very vocal Iowa fans on CP who think the sun rises and sets on Stanzi.

He may end up being a terrific starting QB at some point (hopefully soon), but there is nobody who could really know at this point based on what we've seen.

Hawkeye fan here and I can assure CP...Stanzi is not our future..
Move on nothing to see here.

but ...he is better then Cassel though.

wazu 04-30-2012 11:24 AM

At worst, I think he's the best QB we have.

wazu 04-30-2012 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8582649)
He was never going to play. He was told prior to the season to be prepared for it. It's the Patriot Way.

Link?

htismaqe 04-30-2012 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 8582825)
Link?

Stanzi told several former teammates that. Ed Podolak mentioned it on the radio a few months ago (in the dead period between the end of the season and the Hawkeyes bowl game).

ChiefRocka 04-30-2012 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 8582464)
Ricki Stanzy to replace Eric Roberts in Best Of The Best 3.

HAHA, this is post of the year for me :evil:

My year only started in Feb though.

BossChief 04-30-2012 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 8582825)
Link?

I also did an install for the wife of someone with direct knowledge of the situation that works for the team that told me the same thing.

It was a management call that had nothing to do with coaching.

She didn't say it was a Pioli call specifically, just a "management call".

I never heard anyone else say it.

philfree 04-30-2012 12:49 PM

I'm not a Iowa fan but have been bird hunting up there a couple of times and it was pretty good.

I like Stanzi as a prospect because his resume has alot of things on it that point o him having a chance to make it as an NFL QB. His size is good, he has enough starts, he's won enough games, he's won bowl games, he has an addequate completion%, and he has a natural, easy throwing motion. He also seems like a natural leader.

That was off the top of my head but I'm sure there's another reason or two I'd like to see him get a real chance.

Strongside 04-30-2012 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8583014)
I also did an install for the wife of someone with direct knowledge of the situation that works for the team that told me the same thing.

It was a management call that had nothing to do with coaching.

She didn't say it was a Pioli call specifically, just a "management call".

I never heard anyone else say it.

"Stanzilla" FTW.

DeezNutz 04-30-2012 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 8583030)
I'm not a Iowa fan but have been bird hunting up there a couple of times and it was pretty good.

I like Stanzi as a prospect because his resume has alot of things on it that point o him having a chance to make it as an NFL QB. His size is good, he has enough starts, he's won enough games, he's won bowl games, he has an addequate completion%, and he has a natural, easy throwing motion. He also seems like a natural leader.

That was off the top of my head but I'm sure there's another reason or two I'd like to see him get a real chance.

That's cool that the administration allowed you to bird hunt on campus.

philfree 04-30-2012 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8583042)
That's cool that the administration allowed you to bird hunt on campus.

It was an off campus venture.

Extra Point 04-30-2012 05:22 PM

Stanzi won't get any time but in pre-season. However, I can see him starting next year.

If Pioli lets Stanzi go, he'll be the next Len Dawson for some other NFL team. He's so good, that Pioli will never let him go. Except when he's started for a couple years, and his contract is up.

Easy 6 04-30-2012 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58 (Post 8582591)
Before even starting, at this stage in both careers, Stanzi already has more highlight videos. Sad really we didn't at least give him a try over Palko.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lh3063BlVuk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Awesome, the two fades to the opposite corners of the endzone starting at 1:16 are killer.

How bouts we let him throw those to the Killer Bee's.

kysirsoze 04-30-2012 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 8582503)
Holtus would've had a heart attack over Isaiah "The Human Centi" Pead.

LMAO

Extra Point 05-01-2012 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58 (Post 8582591)
Before even starting, at this stage in both careers, Stanzi already has more highlight videos. Sad really we didn't at least give him a try over Palko.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lh3063BlVuk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

2:38-2:50-- Ricky ****ing Stanzi to Tony ****ing Moeaki!

There is no myth, only hope!

Cornstock 05-01-2012 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58 (Post 8582591)
Before even starting, at this stage in both careers, Stanzi already has more highlight videos. Sad really we didn't at least give him a try over Palko.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lh3063BlVuk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

We should have drafted Marvin McNutt so we could have U of I south. He's actually pretty good from what I understand...great hands, height and strength. I think the knock on him was his speed, but he's a good route runner.

rico 05-01-2012 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cornstock (Post 8585497)
We should have drafted Marvin McNutt so we could have U of I south. He's actually pretty good from what I understand...great hands, height and strength. I think the knock on him was his speed, but he's a good route runner.

I used to love seeing "Mcnutt All Over Your Faces" t-shirts around.

Rausch 05-01-2012 02:54 PM

We drafted the guy because we liked what we saw. It's time to see if he can get it done at the NFL level 'cause we know the guy ahead of him can't...

Extra Point 05-01-2012 04:38 PM

This thread made me fart a rainbow.

The Franchise 05-01-2012 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8583014)
I also did an install for the wife of someone with direct knowledge of the situation that works for the team that told me the same thing.

It was a management call that had nothing to do with coaching.

She didn't say it was a Pioli call specifically, just a "management call".

I never heard anyone else say it.

Well considering this coaching staff makes rookie offensive linemen come off the bench in their first year....instead of starting.....it didn't surprise me that Stanzi never saw the field.

Mother****er better get more playing time this year though. I'm praying for a Cassel bench/injury.

beach tribe 05-01-2012 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8581717)
I cant sell you on him.

If he plays better than Cassel and Quinn he should start.

Pioli would sooner bite off his own clit before starting someone in lieu of his beloved Matt.

He picked Stanzi. So he kinda would get Credit if he has any success.

rico 05-01-2012 05:02 PM

So..... the mannequin in the "New Jersey Numbers" article on kcchiefs.com was wearing #12 (Stanzi's new number). Are they just trying to doink with us?

HonestChieffan 05-01-2012 05:02 PM

If all you have to do is be equal to or better than Cassel and you are not.... Well let me introduce you to the mythical Ricky "Secret Weapon" Stanzi.

BossChief 05-01-2012 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8586120)
Well considering this coaching staff makes rookie offensive linemen come off the bench in their first year....instead of starting.....it didn't surprise me that Stanzi never saw the field.

Mother****er better get more playing time this year though. I'm praying for a Cassel bench/injury.

She was adamant that it wasn't a coaching call at all.

htismaqe 05-01-2012 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8586180)
She was adamant that it wasn't a coaching call at all.

It wasn't. Just like it's not a coaching decision to sit rookie linemen.

It's an ORGANIZATIONAL philosophy.

DTLB58 05-01-2012 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8581709)
Why? Why is this guy held in such high regard around here? I remember him leading exactly *ONE* touchdown drive of note last preseason, and really don't remember him sticking in my memory as a guy that I'd love to have on my team coming out of college.

Are we so starved for a quarterback, ANY quarterback, that we bring up through the ranks to finally break through and be THE GUY that we would put this seemingly average and nondescript player up on a pedestal? I mean, seriously, he couldn't even beat out Tyler Palko for the backup gig. Tyler. Freaking. Palko. It makes me wish I were more of a Hawkeye fan just so I could buy into the "hype" surrounding him. I haven't seen this much hopefull wishing since Casey Printers and Ted White didn't make the team.

So, sell me on this phenom named Stanzi. I dare you.

Let me explain it to you this way.

1) Cassel Sucks

2) There are a lot of Iowa fans around here who watched him play. (I am not a hawks fan, Cyclone actually, even though I support a change to Stanzi) Anyways, Imagine if you will, there was a Missouri or Kansas QB on the Chiefs roster that in 3 seasons threw 56 TD's over 7,000 yards, just 31 INT's in 907 attempts. Had a 26-9 record as starting QB, started and won all 3 of his Bowl games. Wouldn't fans want him to be just given a "Chance" to see what he could do in the NFL?

DBOSHO 05-01-2012 07:10 PM

Stanzi made more plays in preseason last year when he wasnt nanosacked than cassel has his whole career here.

O.city 05-01-2012 07:13 PM

Stanzi= Franchise Savior?

RealSNR 05-01-2012 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTLB58 (Post 8586426)
Let me explain it to you this way.

1) Cassel Sucks

2) There are a lot of Iowa fans around here who watched him play. (I am not a hawks fan, Cyclone actually, even though I support a change to Stanzi) Anyways, Imagine if you will, there was a Missouri or Kansas QB on the Chiefs roster that in 3 seasons threw 56 TD's over 7,000 yards, just 31 INT's in 907 attempts. Had a 26-9 record as starting QB, started and won all 3 of his Bowl games. Wouldn't fans want him to be just given a "Chance" to see what he could do in the NFL?

I'm not even an Iowa fan. I just like what I see in him as a QB.

Well, enough to give him a chance, anyway. He's not like Casey Printers or some other schmuck like that.

mlyonsd 05-01-2012 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTLB58 (Post 8586426)
Let me explain it to you this way.

1) Cassel Sucks

2) There are a lot of Iowa fans around here who watched him play. (I am not a hawks fan, Cyclone actually, even though I support a change to Stanzi) Anyways, Imagine if you will, there was a Missouri or Kansas QB on the Chiefs roster that in 3 seasons threw 56 TD's over 7,000 yards, just 31 INT's in 907 attempts. Had a 26-9 record as starting QB, started and won all 3 of his Bowl games. Wouldn't fans want him to be just given a "Chance" to see what he could do in the NFL?

You forgot he had better stats in the Big Ten than Brady.

You pretty much nailed it. We don't have Manning, Bree's or Rodgers on the roster so why not give him a chance.

Setsuna 05-01-2012 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8581819)
Cassel has 55 career starts. The verdict is in.

Quinn has 12 career starts. Jury is still out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8581834)
Proven? 12 starts is proven?

Yes it is known to be proven. Nice try though.

rico 05-10-2012 01:10 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/r3RkTHPutMY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

rico 05-10-2012 01:12 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7mqWAnNhWS8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

rico 05-10-2012 01:13 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/taGz7UPQXV0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

rico 05-10-2012 01:15 PM

Had some ups and downs in the 1st game...hard to tell with the lack of protection. Looked mostly bad in the 2nd game, but again... had $hit for protection. Had some shaky moments in the 3rd game, but seemed to progress as the game went on.

saphojunkie 05-10-2012 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna (Post 8587015)
Yes it is known to be proven. Nice try though.

Uh...no, it is not. Poor try, though.

Chiefnj2 05-10-2012 01:20 PM

Those videos make you wonder if the backup OL ever actually practices blocking.

saphojunkie 05-10-2012 01:22 PM

Wow, Stanzi looked a lot better than I remember him. Not too much panic in the pocket, although there was some. Good placement as the game went on for sure.

Color me interested.

:hmmm:

vailpass 05-10-2012 01:28 PM

Would any of you trade Stanzi straight up for Brock Osweiler?

Two-Twenty 05-10-2012 01:35 PM

Chicken Shit Soup

Chiefnj2 05-10-2012 01:37 PM

Too bad Palko was so far up Haley's rump. It would have been nice to see Stanzi get some reps with the #1 team in game 4.

RealSNR 05-10-2012 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8606997)
Would any of you trade Stanzi straight up for Brock Osweiler?

LMAO

**** no. I love Stanzi almost as much as I love America. I don't know what would make me feel worse than trading Stanzi for Osweiler. Probably someone desecrating the American flag.

vailpass 05-10-2012 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8607017)
LMAO

**** no. I love Stanzi almost as much as I love America. I don't know what would make me feel worse than trading Stanzi for Osweiler. Probably someone desecrating the American flag.

I like Ricki. He brought me to my feet at least once a game with his patented "WTF are you thinking!!" interceptions but I like him. Wonder if he'll ever get a shot at some meaningful NFL playing minutes.

mcaj22 05-10-2012 01:44 PM

how many guys that Stanzi was playing with in those videos are even on the team right now?

Baldwin? Copper? anyone else? lol

Dante84 05-10-2012 01:50 PM

Stanzi = Brees?

vailpass 05-10-2012 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 8607043)
Stanzi = Brees?

Because they are both B1G?

RealSNR 05-10-2012 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ricoswaff (Post 8606972)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7mqWAnNhWS8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

LOVE that throw at the 10 second mark to Verran Tucker.

Overall I'm seeing the guts and heart that I've been talking about all year. Would have liked to see him attempt some of those throws where he's forced out of the pocket instead of tucking and running. But hey, he was a goddamn rookie.

Showed pretty solid improvement throughout the games even though the offensive line did not.

Can't wait to watch him this preseason! Thanks rico for posting these!

ToxSocks 05-10-2012 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8607053)
LOVE that throw at the 10 second mark to Verran Tucker.

Overall I'm seeing the guts and heart that I've been talking about all year. Would have liked to see him attempt some of those throws where he's forced out of the pocket instead of tucking and running. But hey, he was a goddamn rookie.

Showed pretty solid improvement throughout the games even though the offensive line did not.

Can't wait to watch him this preseason! Thanks rico for posting these!

I agree. The dude looks like a gunslinger. He's looking downfield and he's not afraid to cut it loose. While not perfect, you can tell that the raw talent is there. IMO, he looks exactly like the type of player that needs in game experience and a better understanding of where his WR's are going to be.

I think he has the tools to be a good QB in this league.

Chiefnj2 05-10-2012 01:59 PM

This video proves that Scott Pioli sucks at evaluating OL depth.

RealSNR 05-10-2012 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8607063)
This video proves that Scott Pioli sucks at evaluating OL depth.

I'm really afraid of what that means drafting as big of a project guy as Stephenson.

BossChief 05-10-2012 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8606997)
Would any of you trade Stanzi straight up for Brock Osweiler?

Interesting.

I'd be somewhat tempted to consider it, but I think even with homerism aside I'd keep the kid we drafted.

Canofbier 05-10-2012 02:06 PM

God, I'd forgotten how awful our team was in the preseason and the beginning of the season last year. Those were dark times.

vailpass 05-10-2012 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8607076)
Interesting.

I'd be somewhat tempted to consider it, but I think even with homerism aside I'd keep the kid we drafted.

I honestly don't have an opinion one way or the other at this point. I'd like to have Stanzi because I've liked some things about him over the years and because he's a Hawk.

Osweiler has some measurables.

Neither has proven a thing in the NFL.

mikey23545 05-10-2012 02:10 PM

Anyone who can watch that film clip and not see the difference between Stanzi and Cassell is certifiable.

BossChief 05-10-2012 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8607080)
I honestly don't have an opinion one way or the other at this point. I'd like to have Stanzi because I've liked some things about him over the years and because he's a Hawk.

Osweiler has some measurables.

Neither has proven a thing in the NFL.

That's pretty much where I'm at, too.

Like I said, I'd keep Stanzi...a big part of that is because I don't think Cassel is the starter by mid season and I think RS is "more ready" to play if called upon.

Halfcan 05-10-2012 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8581709)
Why? Why is this guy held in such high regard around here? I remember him leading exactly *ONE* touchdown drive of note last preseason, and really don't remember him sticking in my memory as a guy that I'd love to have on my team coming out of college.

Are we so starved for a quarterback, ANY quarterback, that we bring up through the ranks to finally break through and be THE GUY that we would put this seemingly average and nondescript player up on a pedestal? I mean, seriously, he couldn't even beat out Tyler Palko for the backup gig. Tyler. Freaking. Palko. It makes me wish I were more of a Hawkeye fan just so I could buy into the "hype" surrounding him. I haven't seen this much hopefull wishing since Casey Printers and Ted White didn't make the team.

So, sell me on this phenom named Stanzi. I dare you.

He can throw the Pig Skin a quarter mile and knock you off a bike with a t bone steak--oh wait I think that was in a movie? :hmmm:

ummmm "Hey Ricki your so fine you blow my mind HEY RICKI!!!!

His theme song is catchy.

vailpass 05-10-2012 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8607099)
That's pretty much where I'm at, too.

Like I said, I'd keep Stanzi...a big part of that is because I don't think Cassel is the starter by mid season and I think RS is "more ready" to play if called upon.

That makes sense. I'd like to see Stanzi get a shot with the first-teamers.

rico 05-10-2012 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 8607109)
He can throw the Pig Skin a quarter mile and knock you off a bike with a t bone steak--oh wait I think that was in a movie? :hmmm:

ummmm "Hey Ricki your so fine you blow my mind HEY RICKI!!!!

His theme song is catchy.

RICKI?!?!?!

http://www.suckered.us/images/Ricki_Lake.jpg

NO WAY do I want Ricki leading this team.

RealSNR 05-10-2012 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8607076)
Interesting.

I'd be somewhat tempted to consider it, but I think even with homerism aside I'd keep the kid we drafted.

Osweiler's a big (literally) hit-or-miss prospect. Stanzi had a little more balance coming out of college and has a year's worth of experience in the NFL. Simply, he's more valuable than Osweiler. And if you're in the Chiefs' situation and don't have Peyton Manning as your starting QB, Stanzi BY FAR makes more sense.

Besides, what's Osweiler's ceiling? Big Ben? Hell yeah I'd love to have Big Ben as my starting QB. What's Stanzi's ceiling? Tom Brady. Also pretty damn good.

Both QBs have the same incredibly small chance of achieving their respective ceilings, but Stanzi IS one year into his NFL career. He's got a significant leg up.

Screw homerism being a reason you'd keep him. I think he's just as good as Osweiler as a prospect. It makes no ****ing sense whatsoever to draft a developmental QB then chuck him in the garbage after one year and take another guy when the potential payoff isn't all that much better. In fact, it's far more likely that Osweiler is a giant bust based on the steep learning curve he has.

tooge 05-10-2012 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ricoswaff (Post 8606979)
Had some ups and downs in the 1st game...hard to tell with the lack of protection. Looked mostly bad in the 2nd game, but again... had $hit for protection. Had some shaky moments in the 3rd game, but seemed to progress as the game went on.

I watched the three videos from preseason games one, two, and three. I basically counted the number of times it appeared that Stanzi had even a remote chance to complete a pass because of adequate time without the pocket totally colapsing around him. I figured with that, he was about 15 for 25 with a TD and an INT on a deflection. I think he would have more time with a decent O line. I hope we see the kid at least get a chance.

rico 05-10-2012 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 8607237)
I watched the three videos from preseason games one, two, and three. I basically counted the number of times it appeared that Stanzi had even a remote chance to complete a pass because of adequate time without the pocket totally colapsing around him. I figured with that, he was about 15 for 25 with a TD and an INT on a deflection. I think he would have more time with a decent O line. I hope we see the kid at least get a chance.

I think it sheds some light on how we actually ended up with a guy like Barry Richardson on our OL. On some of those plays, they are in Stanzi's face literally a second after the ball is snapped.

whoman69 05-10-2012 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8606997)
Would any of you trade Stanzi straight up for Brock Osweiler?

The minute we trade Stanzi he is guaranteed to win at least 2 Super Bowls and be a first ballot HOFer.

mcaj22 05-10-2012 04:36 PM

id like to see Stanzi with real NFL talent around him not 10 other guys where 8 of them are currently out of league

saphojunkie 05-10-2012 04:46 PM

Jeez no wonder we drafted Donald Stephenson. Mims is unbelievably bad.

Ace Gunner 05-10-2012 05:16 PM

if ever there was a "trent green pt II" this is the guy. noodle arm but smart & patient, has some close range accuracy.

but without a stellar OL and a smart tough RB like PH, green was nothing and that's like ricki stanzi was last pre season.

it could work out for him like it did green. maybe not.

BossChief 05-10-2012 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8607140)
Osweiler's a big (literally) hit-or-miss prospect. Stanzi had a little more balance coming out of college and has a year's worth of experience in the NFL. Simply, he's more valuable than Osweiler. And if you're in the Chiefs' situation and don't have Peyton Manning as your starting QB, Stanzi BY FAR makes more sense.

Besides, what's Osweiler's ceiling? Big Ben? Hell yeah I'd love to have Big Ben as my starting QB. What's Stanzi's ceiling? Tom Brady. Also pretty damn good.

Both QBs have the same incredibly small chance of achieving their respective ceilings, but Stanzi IS one year into his NFL career. He's got a significant leg up.

Screw homerism being a reason you'd keep him. I think he's just as good as Osweiler as a prospect. It makes no ****ing sense whatsoever to draft a developmental QB then chuck him in the garbage after one year and take another guy when the potential payoff isn't all that much better. In fact, it's far more likely that Osweiler is a giant bust based on the steep learning curve he has.

I might not have worded it correctly but I was saying that "homerism" had NOTHING to do with my take on the situation.

I said way before the draft that there were only 3 qbs that I felt were better than my boy and I meant it.

Just like I meant it when I said Stanzi was a mid-late second round quality prospect.

I'll ALWAYS believe that Stanzi would have had a similar rookie year to that of Dalton if given the chance. I think they were very similar prospects.

Prior to the draft most draft niks had them in the same tier.

BossChief 05-10-2012 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsfootballfan (Post 8607472)
if ever there was a "trent green pt II" this is the guy. noodle arm but smart & patient, has some close range accuracy.

but without a stellar OL and a smart tough RB like PH, green was nothing and that's like ricki stanzi was last pre season.

it could work out for him like it did green. maybe not.

:spock:

Stanzi and Green had noodle arms?

BillSelfsTrophycase 05-10-2012 05:32 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jlU0GQgooWM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

boogblaster 05-10-2012 05:36 PM

green thru one of the best sideline pass routes in the league at that time .. no his arm wasnt a noodle .....

RealSNR 05-10-2012 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8607483)
Prior to the draft most draft niks had them in the same tier.

Definitely. And that's going to be the annoying part this entire offseason (as it has been all offseason)- determining why Dalton got the break in the draft and Stanzi fell.

I still think that scouts placed far too much emphasis on the mistakes Stanzi made as a sophomore and junior. Whatever, though. We never will find out why teams soured on him the way we did.

Ace Gunner 05-10-2012 05:46 PM

jesus christ you ppl are dense. trent green had a weak arm. he wasn't very good. that's why the chargers drafted him in the 10th round and that is why.... holy **** forget it. stanzi is montana. or elway or whover you ****tards want him to be.

BillSelfsTrophycase 05-10-2012 05:53 PM

Wut?

Trent Green certainly wasn't elite, but "not very good"?

vailpass 05-10-2012 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8607509)
Definitely. And that's going to be the annoying part this entire offseason (as it has been all offseason)- determining why Dalton got the break in the draft and Stanzi fell.

I still think that scouts placed far too much emphasis on the mistakes Stanzi made as a sophomore and junior. Whatever, though. We never will find out why teams soured on him the way we did.

Those mistakes were &%$#@!* maddening though. But I always forgave him for the regular season mistakes once bowl time rolled around.

rico 05-10-2012 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8607509)
Definitely. And that's going to be the annoying part this entire offseason (as it has been all offseason)- determining why Dalton got the break in the draft and Stanzi fell.

I still think that scouts placed far too much emphasis on the mistakes Stanzi made as a sophomore and junior. Whatever, though. We never will find out why teams soured on him the way we did.

What teams were rumored to have worked him out or were rumored to have been scouting him heavily? I have heard the Titans, Bengals and Browns worked him out. Were there any others? In 2011, I can't remember off the top of my head who those teams ended up drafting in the rounds leading to Stanzi in #5 (with an exception of the Bengals selecting Dalton and the Titans selecting Locker)... With those teams, I am guessing the Bengals preferred Dalton over Stanzi and the Titans liked Locker a lot. I am guessing that the Browns were still teeter-tottering with Colt Mccoy at the time. Were the 49ers rumored to have scouted Stanzi heavily?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.