ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Schefter: Chiefs leaning towards firing Pioli (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268179)

crossbow 12-30-2012 02:49 PM

Can someone explain the Clark is cheap theory to me. I thought that the more people you have in the stadium - the more money you get from ticket, beer/food, parking, sales....etc. If you lose a lot of games you also lose a lot of fans , royalties, advertisment and a chance at their money. Why would Clark not care about winning?

FAX 12-30-2012 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou_8541 (Post 9252337)
I just don't understand how 2-14 at this point in his tenure can make an owner say, "well, I haven't seen enough fail yet to believe he can't do it. Lets give him another shot." I mean, it's absolutely incredible that he has a job.

A performance record like Scott's would have gotten me fired 3 or 4 times at my current job.

And that is the truth.

If Clark retains Dr. Evil, it's for reasons other than performance as an actual NFL pro football team.

FAX

siberian khatru 12-30-2012 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 9252325)
The problem is that, for every informed anti-Piolite, there are dozens (if not hundreds) of Chiefs fans who guzzle the koolaid. Deb ALL CAPS is not alone. We're talking about tailgate addicts who couldn't care less (more or less) about the inner workings of the franchise. They just want to root for their team ... win or lose.

FAX

There used to be poster here named Luzap who said he didn't really care if the Chiefs won or lost, he was just happy to have the NFL in KC. He liked going to games. Yeah, winning was nice, but so long as he could cheer for a team ...

DeezNutz 12-30-2012 02:51 PM

Earlier this year, Kent Babb said that not firing Pioli would be evidence that Hunt is the worst owner in football.

Kind of hard to argue with this logic.

Marcellus 12-30-2012 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9252350)
Earlier this year, Kent Babb said that not firing Pioli would be evidence that Hunt is the worst owner in football.

Kind of hard to argue with this logic.

I am a Clark supporter and I couldn't argue it.

FAX 12-30-2012 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 9252345)
There used to be poster here named Luzap who said he didn't really care if the Chiefs won or lost, he was just happy to have the NFL in KC. He liked going to games. Yeah, winning was nice, but so long as he could cheer for a team ...

And those people comprise Clark's primary market. Unquestionably. The loyal, faithful Chief Sheep.

FAX

Mizzou_8541 12-30-2012 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 9252343)
And that is the truth.

If Clark retains Dr. Evil, it's for reasons other than performance as an actual NFL pro football team.

FAX

To Clark, his feelings for Scott clearly are > a winning product and a happy fan base.

siberian khatru 12-30-2012 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9252350)
Earlier this year, Kent Babb said that not firing Pioli would be evidence that Hunt is the worst owner in football.

Kind of hard to argue with this logic.

So if he keeps Pioli, what's the leash on him?

Hey he's breaking in a new QB and coach, right? That's gotta be worth another couple of seasons, right?

So 4-12 in 2013, 6-10 in 2014 ... That's some progress.

Dayton ****ing Moore and Scott ****ing Pioli. David ****ing Glass and Clark ****ing Hunt.

WTF am I a fan of these teams?

DeezNutz 12-30-2012 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9252355)
I am a Clark supporter and I couldn't argue it.

I agree. This would be the ownership equivalent of shitting all over the fan base to the point that even Winston would cringe.

ChiefsCountry 12-30-2012 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 9252325)
The problem is that, for every informed anti-Piolite, there are dozens (if not hundreds) of Chiefs fans who guzzle the koolaid. Deb ALL CAPS is not alone. We're talking about tailgate addicts who couldn't care less (more or less) about the inner workings of the franchise. They just want to root for their team ... win or lose.

FAX

The Deb type fans are in small minority, just like most of us are in small minority. That middle class fan that wants to see the team do well/have fun at the game/casual fan is the money making machine. Its what Carl Peterson knew the best with the marketing research they had. A dick sucker like Pioli makes it impossible for that for that big casual group as well.

ChiefsCountry 12-30-2012 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9252355)
I am a Clark supporter and I couldn't argue it.

This for me as well.

Raiderhater 12-30-2012 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 9252345)
There used to be poster here named Luzap who said he didn't really care if the Chiefs won or lost, he was just happy to have the NFL in KC. He liked going to games. Yeah, winning was nice, but so long as he could cheer for a team ...

There is a "name" I haven't heard in a while.

FAX 12-30-2012 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9252368)
The Deb type fans are in small minority, just like most of us are in small minority. That middle class fan that wants to see the team do well/have fun at the game/casual fan is the money making machine. Its what Carl Peterson knew the best with the marketing research they had. A dick sucker like Pioli makes it impossible for that for that big casual group as well.

I'm not so sure. Your words of death have an iron-like quality, though, so I'll ponder the issue some more.

Right now, however, I have to believe that the majority of "Chiefs fans" will buy any change (be it HC, QB, whatever) as sufficient to encourage them to pay the fare.

FAX

DeezNutz 12-30-2012 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 9252365)
WTF am I a fan of these teams?

I hear you, and I'm not sure of my reaction. It's easy to say, "I'm done with this franchise."

But this is the type of emotional reaction that might not be honest or realistic. I've been following this piece of shit organization for decades, so this isn't the type of interest that can be turned on or off like a switch.

I understand that Pioli's pomp and incompetence has been eroding passion and general interest, but any organization is far larger than one person...

Tough situation for fans.

htismaqe 12-30-2012 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 9252389)
I'm not so sure. Your words of death have an iron-like quality, though, so I'll ponder the issue some more.

Right now, however, I have to believe that the majority of "Chiefs fans" will buy any change (be it HC, QB, whatever) as sufficient to encourage them to pay the fare.

FAX

I will admit, I want to draft a QB SO BAD, I don't know if I will be able to quit watching, even if it is Pioli that is doing the drafting.

htismaqe 12-30-2012 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9252392)
I hear you, and I'm not sure of my reaction. It's easy to say, "I'm done with this franchise."

But this is the type of emotional reaction that might not be honest or realistic. I've been following this piece of shit organization for decades, so this isn't the type of interest that can be turned on or off like a switch.

I understand that Pioli's pomp and incompetence has been eroding passion and general interest, but any organization is far larger than one person...

Tough situation for fans.

THIS

Messier 12-30-2012 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou_8541 (Post 9252361)
To Clark, his feelings for Scott clearly are > a winning product and a happy fan base.

They could just rent a house together or something. Why does their relationship have to interfere with my enjoyment of the Chiefs.

KCUnited 12-30-2012 02:59 PM

If true, this should take SMU from death row to the chair.

BossChief 12-30-2012 02:59 PM

PUT ON YOUR TIN FOIL HAT:

Is it possible that Clark wanted a franchise quarterback and told Pioli to tank this season to get the top pick to get one and that if he did so his job would be safe?

I know for a fact that he made it clear to Herm Edwards that he wanted the team to play the young players in 2008 in hopes of getting them experience and putting the team in position to draft a quarterback...but these two things are totally different.

Ok, you can take the tin foil hats off. That idea is silly.

-King- 12-30-2012 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9252203)
It's not just ticket sales.

Pioli has his hand in every aspect of the org. Operation costs from the amount of ink used, to paper ordered, to the fabric on sales people's chairs have been micromanaged by him.

He has his hands everywhere. He's cut their spending significantly over what Carl had done. That was one of the appeals Clark first had with Scott is SP came in and pinpointed areas to save money.

Clark is a business man. He hasn't lost money a single year Pioli has been here.

Has any team ever lost money?

ChiefsCountry 12-30-2012 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 9252389)
I'm not so sure. Your words of death have an iron-like quality, though, so I'll ponder the issue some more.

Right now, however, I have to believe that the majority of "Chiefs fans" will buy any change (be it HC, QB, whatever) as sufficient to encourage them to pay the fare.

FAX

Its pretty know fact. Generally among the season ticket holder base, you will have:

10k or so are the Deb and Luzap types.
10k or so are business tickets
10k or so the total hardcore football fans aka CP posters.

You would have an average of 30k or so just on those demographics. The casual fan it what takes the 30k up to the 70k+ plus crowds. Its what Carl Peterson knew and understood well.

Its simple really especially in the midwest - make it fun, make the players envolved in the community, and win enough to put you in the hunt each year.

Mr. Laz 12-30-2012 03:01 PM

If Pioli hires Chip Kelly or the equivalent
If Pioli drafts Geno Smith or the equivalent
If the Chiefs start playing well

You will all be back :fire:



ROFL

BossChief 12-30-2012 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9252392)
I hear you, and I'm not sure of my reaction. It's easy to say, "I'm done with this franchise."

But this is the type of emotional reaction that might not be honest or realistic. I've been following this piece of shit organization for decades, so this isn't the type of interest that can be turned on or off like a switch.

I understand that Pioli's pomp and incompetence has been eroding passion and general interest, but any organization is far larger than one person...

Tough situation for fans.

What they do in the draft will hold a lot more weight in my eyes than if Pioli is fired or kept.

If I could chose between keeping Pioli and drafting Geno Smith with our pick OR firing Pioli and NOT choosing Geno...Id be fine with Pioli staying.

ROYC75 12-30-2012 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9252410)
PUT ON YOUR TIN FOIL HAT:

Is it possible that Clark wanted a franchise quarterback and told Pioli to tank this season to get the top pick to get one and that if he did so his job would be safe?

I know for a fact that he made it clear to Herm Edwards that he wanted the team to play the young players in 2008 in hopes of getting them experience and putting the team in position to draft a quarterback...but these two things are totally different.

Ok, you can take the tin foil hats off. That idea is silly.

About as much as, Pioli staying, Marty taking over HC with Pioli having a hard on for Barkley & Glennon.

This would probably just kill me!

-King- 12-30-2012 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9252355)
I am a Clark supporter and I couldn't argue it.

This.

stonedstooge 12-30-2012 03:03 PM

Belcher Belchered us

Hammock Parties 12-30-2012 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9252410)
PUT ON YOUR TIN FOIL HAT:

Is it possible that Clark wanted a franchise quarterback and told Pioli to tank this season to get the top pick to get one and that if he did so his job would be safe?

I know for a fact that he made it clear to Herm Edwards that he wanted the team to play the young players in 2008 in hopes of getting them experience and putting the team in position to draft a quarterback...but these two things are totally different.

Ok, you can take the tin foil hats off. That idea is silly.

No. LMAO

bowener 12-30-2012 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 9251665)
If this is true, much respect to SOC and all the other fans that have made their displeasure known. However, it doesn't change the fact that the Hunts seem dumb as **** to not be able to fire Pioli's ass for his obvious failures.

This scares me looking into the future.

Mr. Laz 12-30-2012 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9252425)
If Pioli hires Chip Kelly or the equivalent
If Pioli drafts Geno Smith or the equivalent
If the Chiefs start playing well

You will all be back :fire:



ROFL

scratch that


If the Chiefs start playing well

You will all be back :D

FloridaMan88 12-30-2012 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedstooge (Post 9252438)
Belcher Belchered us

To think some people on this message board were actually naive enough to believe that Fat Scott WOULDN'T find a way to use the Belcher situation to save his job.

Fat Scott is pure evil.

siberian khatru 12-30-2012 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedstooge (Post 9252438)
Belcher Belchered us

He should've taken the decision out of Clark's hands.

Mr. Laz 12-30-2012 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedstooge (Post 9252438)
Belcher Belchered us

wha?

Raiderhater 12-30-2012 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9252399)
I will admit, I want to draft a QB SO BAD, I don't know if I will be able to quit watching, even if it is Pioli that is doing the drafting.

I will continue to watch with a keen eye to see what moves are made. Anything less than GREAT choices for HC and QB and I'm done.

Jerm 12-30-2012 03:06 PM

I'm just curious as to what will be Clark's reasoning if indeed Pioli is retained and even given an extension...

There is literally NOTHING he can say to justify it so it'd be hilarious to watch.

I just cannot believe this guy would be that goddamn stupid...

Mr. Laz 12-30-2012 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Janus (Post 9252448)
To think some people on this message board were actually naive enough to believe that Fat Scott WOULDN'T find a way to use the Belcher situation to save his job.

Fat Scott is pure evil.

and you're pure stupid


Belcher has NOTHING to do with this

hometeam 12-30-2012 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crossbow (Post 9252341)
Can someone explain the Clark is cheap theory to me. I thought that the more people you have in the stadium - the more money you get from ticket, beer/food, parking, ticket sales....etc. If you lose a lot of games you also lose a lot of fans , royalties, advertisment and a chance at their money. Why would Clark not care about winning?

Because revenue sharing is all the money.

htismaqe 12-30-2012 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9252447)
scratch that


If the Chiefs start playing well

You will all be back :D

2010 well or for REAL well?

We've seen this team play well before, that doesn't mean the team was GOOD.

DeezNutz 12-30-2012 03:06 PM

I'm sorry, but this is reading a lot like the draft thread when McBust and the other midget were selected.

**** this shit!

Well, I'm OK with the selections if...

They're good players!

suds79 12-30-2012 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 9252454)
I'm just curious as to what will be Clark's reasoning if indeed Pioli is retained and even given an extension...

There is literally NOTHING he can say to justify it so it'd be hilarious to watch.

I just cannot believe this guy would be that goddamn stupid...

It would confirm him as one of the worse owners in sports who only cares about $.

htismaqe 12-30-2012 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9252461)
I'm sorry, but this is reading a lot like the draft thread when McBust and the other midget were selected.

**** this shit!

Well, I'm OK with the selections if...

They're good players!

If Scott Pioli takes Geno Smith, then what?

siberian khatru 12-30-2012 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 9252454)
I'm just curious as to what will be Clark's reasoning if indeed Pioli is retained and even given an extension...

There is literally NOTHING he can say to justify it so it'd be hilarious to watch.

I just cannot believe this guy would be that goddamn stupid...

That's just it. How do you trust a guy who's failed to find a QB and a head coach ... to go out and find a QB and head coach?

All Clark can say is "Based on his track record in New England, I think he deserves a third chance." A THIRD CHANCE.

Messier 12-30-2012 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiderhader (Post 9252452)
I will continue to watch with a keen eye to see what moves are made. Anything less than GREAT choices for HC and QB and I'm done.

Then get ready to be done.

I can't see a great HC and a great draft in the future for a Pioli run team.

Messier 12-30-2012 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 9252470)
That's just it. How do you trust a guy who's failed to find a QB and a head coach ... to go out and find a QB and head coach?

All Clark can say is "Based on his track record in New England, I think he deserves a third chance." A THIRD CHANCE.

It's why I want them absolutely grilled in the post season PC. It won't happen to the extent we'd like, but they have to be pressed on why Pioli deserves another shot.

suds79 12-30-2012 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiderhader (Post 9252452)
I will continue to watch with a keen eye to see what moves are made. Anything less than GREAT choices for HC and QB and I'm done.

Would it really matter? If Scott is back, we have a owner problem and will never win then. No that would be it for me then.

Raiderhater 12-30-2012 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9252461)
I'm sorry, but this is reading a lot like the draft thread when McBust and the other midget were selected.

**** this shit!

Well, I'm OK with the selections if...

They're good players!

As a couple of others have stated, it isn't something we can just turn off with the flip of a switch. A couple of stellar choices would keep me at least tuned in. Not happy but, tuned in to see what becomes of it.

Discuss Thrower 12-30-2012 03:11 PM

Meanwhile Wallace Gilberry is going to the playoffs.

DeezNutz 12-30-2012 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9252469)
If Scott Pioli takes Geno Smith, then what?

That's great. I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't be extremely interested and thunderstruck by the organization actually drafting a QB.

However, what evidence do we have that Pioli would make any other moves that would aid Smith in his development? But we have loads of evidence to suggest that Pioli would reaffirm a twisted, counter-productive environment at Arrowhead which makes it tough for anyone to succeed.

Ace Gunner 12-30-2012 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 9252459)
Because revenue sharing is all the money.

folks here can be quite naive.

Mr. Laz 12-30-2012 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9252460)
2010 well or for REAL well?

We've seen this team play well before, that doesn't mean the team was GOOD.

makes a difference for some, not for others.


top goal: start playing well
2nd goal: get a QB that people can believe in
3rd goal: get a coach that people can believe in

the more of these that get done the better since all 3 are 'tangled' together but still ... start winning and the Chiefs' bandwagon will fill back up regardless of who the GM is

Titty Meat 12-30-2012 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9252431)
What they do in the draft will hold a lot more weight in my eyes than if Pioli is fired or kept.

If I could chose between keeping Pioli and drafting Geno Smith with our pick OR firing Pioli and NOT choosing Geno...Id be fine with Pioli staying.

What a difference an hour makes.

Skyy God 12-30-2012 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 9252492)
Meanwhile Wallace Gilberry is going to the playoffs.

Good for him. Dude's had a productive year and can play (just not 3-4 end).

htismaqe 12-30-2012 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9252502)
That's great. I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't be extremely interested and thunderstruck by the organization actually drafting a QB.

However, what evidence do we have that Pioli would make any other moves that would aid Smith in his development? But we have loads of evidence to suggest that Pioli would reaffirm a twisted, counter-productive environment at Arrowhead which makes it tough for anyone to succeed.

I hear ya. I feel exactly the same way.

mcaj22 12-30-2012 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 9252492)
Meanwhile Wallace Gilberry is going to the playoffs.

and Bernard Pollard is going to the Pro Bowl lol

ROYC75 12-30-2012 03:14 PM

Winning cures all problems with the fans.

Always have!

Always will, you win, the fans will show up for games.

Raiderhater 12-30-2012 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9252471)
Then get ready to be done.

I can't see a great HC and a great draft in the future for a Pioli run team.

I can't either. That is why I have this sick feeling in the pit of my stomach right now.

But stranger things have happened... I suppose....

FAX 12-30-2012 03:14 PM

There is a fundamental problem with the, "if the Chiefs start playing well, you'll be back" notion. I mean, it sounds right, but there's a flaw in the implied logic.

There is absolutely no reason to believe that Pioli can foster an environment, hire a head coach, draft the proper talent, or organize the overall effort in such a way as to cause the Chiefs to "start playing well". None. Zero.

In fact, all available evidence points clearly to the fact that Pioli is an incompetent imbecile whose personal, psychological problems inhibit any potential ability he may possess in that regard.

This, dear friends, is year 4 of his goal to "build a champion" and "consistently play for championships". Good God in Heaven. At a minimum, we may thank our lucky stars that his objective wasn't simply to "compete with marginal teams" because, if it were, we would be selling the franchise to the Mexicans.

FAX

Messier 12-30-2012 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 9252488)
Would it really matter? If Scott is back, we have a owner problem and will never win then. No that would be it for me then.

I still don't have a problem with Hunt. He hired what seemed the obvious choice for GM. He's got the same problem his dad had, just too loyal.

Raiderhater 12-30-2012 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 9252488)
Would it really matter? If Scott is back, we have a owner problem and will never win then. No that would be it for me then.

How many people here have pointed out that with a legit QB and HC you can succeed? And if you have a super star QB you may not even need that great a HC. The GM and owner are out of the equation at that point.

Not saying that is the way I would like to see it but, it does not change the fact it could still work.

suds79 12-30-2012 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9252523)
I still don't have a problem with Hunt. He hired what seemed the obvious choice for GM. He's got the same problem his dad had, just too loyal.

I'm not talking about 4 years ago. Agreed, at the time it appeared to be the right move. But we have a ton more evidence now. If Clark doesn't make this move, he's David Glass to me. With just about as likely of a chance to ever win big also... Yeah, I'd have a problem with that type of owner.

dallaschiefsfan 12-30-2012 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 9252521)
There is a fundamental problem with the, "if the Chiefs start playing well, you'll be back" notion. I mean, it sounds right, but there's a flaw in the implied logic.

There is absolutely no reason to believe that Pioli can foster an environment, hire a head coach, draft the proper talent, or organize the overall effort in such a way as to cause the Chiefs to "start playing well". None. Zero.

In fact, all available evidence points clearly to the fact that Pioli is an incompetent imbecile whose personal, psychological problems inhibit any potential ability he may possess in that regard.

This, dear friends, is year 4 of his goal to "build a champion" and "consistently play for championships". Good God in Heaven. At a minimum, we may thank our lucky stars that his objective wasn't simply to "compete with marginal teams" because, if it were, we would be selling the franchise to the Mexicans.

FAX


THIS x 1,000,000

Mr. Laz 12-30-2012 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 9252564)
I'm not talking about 4 years ago. Agreed, at the time it appeared to be the right move. But we have a ton more evidence now. If Clark doesn't make this move, he's David Glass to me. With just about as likely of a chance to ever win big also... Yeah, I'd have a problem with that type of owner.

I can only hope you aren't referring to all the rumors as evidence.

Pioli missed twice on hiring a good Head Coach
Pioli blew it on getting a good QB
Pioli has a losing record in KC

Now that's enough to get a GM fired, no doubt.

after that, it's pretty much rumor mongering bullshit

DeezNutz 12-30-2012 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9252591)
I can only hope you aren't referring to all the rumors as evidence.

Pioli missed twice on hiring a good Head Coach
Pioli blew it on getting a good QB
Pioli has a losing record in KC

Now that's enough to get a GM fired, no doubt.

after that, it's pretty much rumor mongering bullshit

You really believe that Babb and Whitlock are making up the reports about the introductory dinner?

"Arrowhead Anxiety" is rumor mongering bullshit, written by a journalist now employed by The Post?

These are facts.

Shag 12-30-2012 03:32 PM

If Pioli is retained, then I can kiss goodbye to this team winning a SB in my lifetime. Clark will have proven himself to be a terrible, gullible owner, with no concept of how to run a team. The Hunts certainly aren't going to sell. I was so looking forward to having something to cheer for again...

Messier 12-30-2012 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shag (Post 9252691)
If Pioli is retained, then I can kiss goodbye to this team winning a SB in my lifetime. Clark will have proven himself to be a terrible, gullible owner, with no concept of how to run a team. The Hunts certainly aren't going to sell. I was so looking forward to having something to cheer for again...

How old are you?

ChiefsCountry 12-30-2012 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9252680)
You really believe that Babb and Whitlock are making up the reports about the introductory dinner?

"Arrowhead Anxiety" is rumor mongering bullshit, written by a journalist now employed by The Post?

These are facts.

Laz has a bigger crush on Pioli than Clark Hunt does.

Shag 12-30-2012 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9252720)
How old are you?

36. Yeah, it's extreme, but shit - Clark is only 47. He'll be around for a very long time, and if he runs his team based on friendship, and not performance, then this team will never succeed. He will have been proven to either be blind, or uncaring to the product on the field - either is the kiss of death. As far as I'm concerned, his moves this week will determine the long-term future of this team...

htismaqe 12-30-2012 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9252591)
I can only hope you aren't referring to all the rumors as evidence.

Pioli missed twice on hiring a good Head Coach
Pioli blew it on getting a good QB
Pioli has a losing record in KC

Now that's enough to get a GM fired, no doubt.

after that, it's pretty much rumor mongering bullshit

ROFL

chiefzilla1501 12-30-2012 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9252720)
How old are you?

Even if he was five, he's probably right.

clyde05 12-30-2012 04:41 PM

Schefter just reported that Andy Reid and Jeffrey Lurie scheduled to meet Monday. A team official insisted Lurie has not informed Reid he will be fired.

Chieftain58 12-30-2012 04:50 PM

Fukc him

BigMeatballDave 12-30-2012 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clyde05 (Post 9253451)
Schefter just reported that Andy Reid and Jeffrey Lurie scheduled to meet Monday. A team official insisted Lurie has not informed Reid he will be fired.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...delphia-eagles

HonestChieffan 12-30-2012 04:53 PM

Pioli will not be canned. Makes me sick

O.city 12-30-2012 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9252591)
I can only hope you aren't referring to all the rumors as evidence.

Pioli missed twice on hiring a good Head Coach
Pioli blew it on getting a good QB
Pioli has a losing record in KC

Now that's enough to get a GM fired, no doubt.

after that, it's pretty much rumor mongering bullshit

ORLY?ROFL

DTHOF 12-30-2012 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chief103182 (Post 9251652)

ROFL

Hammock Parties 12-30-2012 05:00 PM

The rubbermaid tubs.

Believe in the rubbermaid tubs.

007 12-30-2012 05:02 PM

JFC can Monday just get here now. Hell, can we just do what the Eagles did?

ARROW2 12-30-2012 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chieftain58 (Post 9253564)
Fukc him





I'D HIT IT!!!!!!!!!!

htismaqe 12-30-2012 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9253645)
JFC can Monday just get here now. Hell, can we just do what the Eagles did?

To be fair, our game isn't over yet.

For all we know, they're talking about RAC getting fired on the NBC pre game in 2 hours...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.