ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Jason Cole expects Chiefs to trade Albert for pick in '14 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=272604)

Mother****erJones 04-28-2013 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9642904)
If he gets hurt, obviously he didn't play up to standards they had hoped.


And this is the most incoherent statement i've read today. What are you trying to say.

No. Just because he gets hurt doesn't mean he wasn't playing well.

O.city 04-28-2013 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 9642913)
No. Just because he gets hurt doesn't mean he wasn't playing well.

If he's playing well, then gets hurt, they aren't trading up to get a QB.

Unless he's absolutely garbage, Smith will be th eQB in KC for the next 2-3 years, for certain.

Mother****erJones 04-28-2013 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9642915)
If he's playing well, then gets hurt, they aren't trading up to get a QB.

Unless he's absolutely garbage, Smith will be th eQB in KC for the next 2-3 years, for certain.

Doesn't mean they won't identify a must have QB and go get him and let him sit.

WV 04-28-2013 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9642909)
I guess he better be an instant upgrade, a large noticable one at that, otherwise it was a huge waste.

The worrisome part is that we'll improve to 8 or 9 wins and that will be enough to keep him here entirely too long and allow them to continue to ignore the QB in the draft.

I hope I'm wrong, but I absolutely hate the Average Smith trade and think it will set this team back at QB for at least 2 or 3 more years.

O.city 04-28-2013 10:05 PM

If they choose to "go get a must have QB" that has to sit, well, thats probably a pretty stupid decision.

O.city 04-28-2013 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WV (Post 9642922)
The worrisome part is that we'll improve to 8 or 9 wins and that will be enough to keep him here entirely too long and allow them to continue to ignore the QB in the draft.

I hope I'm wrong, but I absolutely hate the Average Smith trade and think it will set this team back at QB for at least 2 or 3 more years.

Talking about Fisher over Albert.


But carry on.

RunKC 04-28-2013 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9642909)
I guess he better be an instant upgrade, a large noticable one at that, otherwise it was a huge waste.

He'll be a better overall LT IMO. This dude is gonna be a baller.

O.city 04-28-2013 10:08 PM

What would be worse than taking a QB at 1.1 who isn't ready and will ahve to sit? Trading up into the top of the first round, likely using multiple picks to do so, for a QB that will have to sit a year or two.

WV 04-28-2013 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9642927)
Talking about Fisher over Albert.


But carry on.

Oops. Sorry. You are correct in this instance. They are essentially willing to let a very good LT go in the hopes we drafted an elite one.

O.city 04-28-2013 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WV (Post 9642933)
Oops. Sorry. You are correct in this instance. They are essentially willing to let a very good LT go in the hopes we drafted an elite one.

Yeah. Which is fine, I think he will be.

But he needs to be very very quickly and for a long time for it to be a good pick.

Mother****erJones 04-28-2013 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9642931)
What would be worse than taking a QB at 1.1 who isn't ready and will ahve to sit? Trading up into the top of the first round, likely using multiple picks to do so, for a QB that will have to sit a year or two.

Not if that QB can win us a Super Bowl or 2.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-28-2013 10:59 PM

Brandon Albert calls the shots in this house. Not some goddamned rookie and CERTAINLY not some johnny come-lately hack like Dorseid. Accept it, and go in peace.
Posted via Mobile Device

Sassy Squatch 04-28-2013 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9643031)
Brandon Albert calls the shots in this house. Not some goddamned rookie and CERTAINLY not some johnny come-lately hack like Dorseid. Accept it, and go in peace.
Posted via Mobile Device

I thought you were leaving forever?

Tribal Warfare 04-28-2013 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 9643036)
I thought you were leaving forever?


I missed that why is he leaving forever or should?

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-28-2013 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 9643036)
I thought you were leaving forever?

I live here forevar. That's what I said.
Posted via Mobile Device

-King- 04-28-2013 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9643031)
Brandon Albert calls the shots in this house. Not some goddamned rookie and CERTAINLY not some johnny come-lately hack like Dorseid. Accept it, and go in peace.
Posted via Mobile Device

Who's Brandon Albert?

Sassy Squatch 04-28-2013 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9643038)
I missed that why is he leaving forever or should?

We didn't draft Geno.

Bump 04-29-2013 12:13 AM

Can't we play him for this season and then franchise him again and then trade him or some shit?

penbrook 04-29-2013 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9643056)
I live here forevar. That's what I said.
Posted via Mobile Device

Glad too see you on here and not leave like Blackmon.

bowener 04-29-2013 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 9643096)
Can't we play him for this season and then franchise him again and then trade him or some shit?

yes

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-29-2013 12:24 AM

The Chiefs aren't taking a QB next year unless they are drafting top 5. If they draft at 10-16 and a QB falls the fans will want the Chiefs to pass on him because they don't have a second and he won't be ready to plug and play. If they draft in the latter half they'll say that Smith greatly improved the team and deserves to be the guy going forward.

It will be the same song and dance it always was.

cdcox 04-29-2013 12:32 AM

In big picture context, the way the New Regime (NR) has handled the LT position has been a cluster****. My preferences:

1) sign BA to a long term contract before the draft and use 1.1 for a higher priority need
2) Draft Fisher 1.1 and sign BA to play LG or RT
3) Trade BA for a 2013 2nd round pick
4) Trade BA for a 2014 2nd round pick
5) Keep BA for 2013 and ???. We're in no man's land at this point.

Based on where we're at now, assuming BA isn't jumping up and down about changing positions, trading him for a 2014 2nd is the best cut-your-losses proposition. Black mark on the NR.

cdcox 04-29-2013 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 9643096)
Can't we play him for this season and then franchise him again and then trade him or some shit?

Trade value in 2014 will be off the charts. In not the right direction.

BlackHelicopters 04-29-2013 05:26 AM

Hard to believe the " new Chiefs" screwed this up just like the "old Chiefs".

Dave Lane 04-29-2013 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9642840)
they obviously don't need him

and they aren't going to offer more than they did this year, if they offer anything at all which i doubt

and we aren't trading 5 picks for Bridgewater

otherwise, solid post

And the lack of 2 2nds to move up with.

MahiMike 04-29-2013 07:16 AM

Let him play LT this year and THEN take a 2nd round pick. Too little, too late Miami.

Chief Roundup 04-29-2013 07:28 AM

If we trade Albert now we should get a 1st in next years draft. Otherwise we should play him for the year and trade him for a 2cd after the season.

Anyong Bluth 04-29-2013 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9642717)
He's not going to want to extend this year though.

It happens plenty he's not an unrestricted free agent, so the agents have a good idea of salary ranges esp. now that they don't have to worry about top draft picks going really high at the same position that would throw off the relative highest paid vets pay rankings. Plus, often times the teams will sweeten the pot for incentives and guaranteed money because they can more easily work the contract to favor their cap situation.

Chiefs would be smart to look at getting a dialogue with his agent going right about mid season so they can hopefully hammer things out in the final weeks before the season ends or just right after it.

Anyong Bluth 04-29-2013 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9642890)
Jon Martin would be the LT. He filled in for a few games at the end of last season and did okay.

I'd view it as no different than the Chiefs rolling with Stephenson for a year to see how it goes. Maybe it works and maybe it doesn't.

Based upon their continued interest and that Ireland's head will roll if they don't have a pretty good season, I'm inclined to say he's not as nonchalant as that, and I doubt nor is there anything that points to the chiefs cool with playing Stephenson and just "seeing how it works."

HMc 04-29-2013 07:35 AM

Why do people think Albert's trade value is going to rise rather than fall?

If I understand things, the Chiefs couldn't get a 2nd for him this year. Why is he suddenly going to command a 2nd in 12 months time? If you want a 2014 2, you're gonna have to do it now. Next year you'll only get a 2014 3, I reckon.

-King- 04-29-2013 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth (Post 9643258)
It happens plenty he's not an unrestricted free agent, so the agents have a good idea of salary ranges esp. now that they don't have to worry about top draft picks going really high at the same position that would throw off the relative highest paid vets pay rankings. Plus, often times the teams will sweeten the pot for incentives and guaranteed money because they can more easily work the contract to favor their cap situation.

Chiefs would be smart to look at getting a dialogue with his agent going right about mid season so they can hopefully hammer things out in the final weeks before the season ends or just right after it.

Justin Houston literally has NO leverage in a contract negotiation right now. A player doesn't want to be extended until his 4th year in the league.
Posted via Mobile Device

-King- 04-29-2013 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HMc (Post 9643270)
Why do people think Albert's trade value is going to rise rather than fall?

If I understand things, the Chiefs couldn't get a 2nd for him this year. Why is he suddenly going to command a 2nd in 12 months time? If you want a 2014 2, you're gonna have to do it now. Next year you'll only get a 2014 3, I reckon.

Getting a 2nd now is basically like getting a 3rd after the season.

Would you rather have Branden Albert + a 3rd next year. Or just a 2nd round pick next year. I pick the former.
Posted via Mobile Device

Hog's Gone Fishin 04-29-2013 07:47 AM

The only trade I'd be willing to make is to the Raiders for their 1st next year. Albert was a 1st round pick and has played like a 1st round pick. Why should we take a 2nd for him. Dumb !

ILChief 04-29-2013 07:48 AM

Trade him

HMc 04-29-2013 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9643286)
Getting a 2nd now is basically like getting a 3rd after the season.

Would you rather have Branden Albert + a 3rd next year. Or just a 2nd round pick next year. I pick the former.
Posted via Mobile Device

So he can protect smith during the 2013 superbowl run?

I'd rather the 2nd.

Chief Roundup 04-29-2013 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HMc (Post 9643270)
Why do people think Albert's trade value is going to rise rather than fall?

There were a several LTs available in the draft and there were an unusual amount of LT/OT in FA this year as well.
Brandon Albert is being undervalued because a flooded market with OL and a bullshit injury question.
There will not be that many quality tackles available this next offseason. If BA has a good year with no health issues then that issue will be resolved. With those two things being out of the problem. His value should be higher than it was this offseason.

TEX 04-29-2013 07:56 AM

At this point, I'd keep BA and play him where I wanted him to play. If he doesn't like it - tough. Then trade him after the season.

ILChief 04-29-2013 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 9643320)
At this point, I'd keep BA and play him where I wanted him to play. If he doesn't like it - tough.

Or that, I really don't want him at LT this year. If its RT or G then fine

TEX 04-29-2013 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9643317)
There were a several LTs available in the draft and there were an unusual amount of LT/OT in FA this year as well.
Brandon Albert is being undervalued because a flooded market with OL and a bullshit injury question.
There will not be that many quality tackles available this next offseason. If BA has a good year with no health issues then that issue will be resolved. With those two things being out of the problem. His value should be higher than it was this offseason.



That's exactly how I see it.

BossChief 04-29-2013 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9643103)
The Chiefs aren't taking a QB next year unless they are drafting top 5. If they draft at 10-16 and a QB falls the fans will want the Chiefs to pass on him because they don't have a second and he won't be ready to plug and play. If they draft in the latter half they'll say that Smith greatly improved the team and deserves to be the guy going forward.

It will be the same song and dance it always was.

I just don't think that's Andy Reids mo.

WV 04-29-2013 09:43 AM

This should be the Chiefs draft or franchise theme song.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lTHCwU9rUdY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

GoChargers 04-29-2013 11:16 AM

I don't see the Chargers doing this deal. IIRC, our front office will actually have cap space next year and could just sign an LT.

Mother****erJones 04-29-2013 11:26 AM

Omar Kelly ‏@OmarKelly 29m
Folks.....Branden Albert trade to Miami is DEAD....Unless Albert comes down on his asking price stick a fork in him landing with the Phins

Chief Roundup 04-29-2013 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9643103)
The Chiefs aren't taking a QB next year unless they are drafting top 5. If they draft at 10-16 and a QB falls the fans will want the Chiefs to pass on him because they don't have a second and he won't be ready to plug and play. If they draft in the latter half they'll say that Smith greatly improved the team and deserves to be the guy going forward.

It will be the same song and dance it always was.

We will have our 2cd next year. We won't have our 3rd.

acesn8s 04-29-2013 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9642617)
:spock: Wtf are you talking about?

Essentially a 3 team trade..

Chiefs=Smith
Fins=Albert
49ers=2 2nd round picks

DeezNutz 04-29-2013 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9643103)
The Chiefs aren't taking a QB next year unless they are drafting top 5. If they draft at 10-16 and a QB falls the fans will want the Chiefs to pass on him because they don't have a second and he won't be ready to plug and play. If they draft in the latter half they'll say that Smith greatly improved the team and deserves to be the guy going forward.

It will be the same song and dance it always was.

LMAO. The Chiefs aren't drafting a QB in the first in the foreseeable future. No ****ing chance. Even if they're top 5, there will be a WR (or something) that better "warrants" the selection.

You know this, and I know this. Some, however, will perform mental gymnastics to try to argue otherwise.

RealSNR 04-29-2013 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9644070)
LMAO. The Chiefs aren't drafting a QB in the first in the foreseeable future. No ****ing chance. Even if they're top 5, there will be a WR (or something) that better "warrants" the selection.

You know this, and I know this. Some, however, will perform mental gymnastics to try to argue otherwise.

Wasn't the right year.

Geez. Just terrible luck the Chiefs are having. All these opportunities to draft Ryan, Flacco, Freeman, Dalton, Kaepernick, Tannehill, Wilson, Geno, and Barkley, but they're never at JUUUUST the right pick in the right round in the right year.

It's a real wonder how other teams manage to have these brilliant QBs fall into their laps. Because as everybody knows that if the moment is not absolutely 100% perfect to draft a QB, then it will set your franchise back for a full decade.

Mav 04-29-2013 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9644070)
LMAO. The Chiefs aren't drafting a QB in the first in the foreseeable future. No ****ing chance. Even if they're top 5, there will be a WR (or something) that better "warrants" the selection.

You know this, and I know this. Some, however, will perform mental gymnastics to try to argue otherwise.

I disagree with that. If you guys end up with a top 5 next year. You for sure will draft a qb, and Alex Smith will be gone. Too many options next season, (at the moment) stuff changes i know, but you can count on Bridgewater, Boyd, Renner, Aaron Murray, Heisman, Logan Thomas, all being considered top 3 round qbs at the moment.

BossChief 04-29-2013 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9644070)
LMAO. The Chiefs aren't drafting a QB in the first in the foreseeable future. No ****ing chance. Even if they're top 5, there will be a WR (or something) that better "warrants" the selection.

You know this, and I know this. Some, however, will perform mental gymnastics to try to argue otherwise.

Care to make a wager on that?

Foreseeable future = next 4 drafts?

WhiteWhale 04-29-2013 03:04 PM

Christ, we'll get a comp pick for him if he walks and it would probably be a late 3rd rounder.

If we can't get a high second or better, then he's more valuable on the field for one more season.

Mav 04-29-2013 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9644202)
Care to make a wager on that?

Foreseeable future = next 4 drafts?

I could see one being drafted next year regardless how the chiefs do this season.

WhiteWhale 04-29-2013 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9644201)
I disagree with that. If you guys end up with a top 5 next year. You for sure will draft a qb, and Alex Smith will be gone. Too many options next season, (at the moment) stuff changes i know, but you can count on Bridgewater, Boyd, Renner, Aaron Murray, Heisman, Logan Thomas, all being considered top 3 round qbs at the moment.

It's battered fan syndrome.

We don't expect our team to do anything but what they've been doing for 20 years now. Trade for back up... coddle and make excuses for him. Back up makes a probowl in spite of team not really winning or him not really playing well. Plays like garbage the next season and new back up QB is traded for.

We don't 'draft' QB's in Kansas City.

Mav 04-29-2013 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9644208)
It's battered fan syndrome.

We don't expect our team to do anything but what they've been doing for 20 years now. Trade for back up... coddle and make excuses for him. Back up makes a probowl in spite of team not really winning or him not really playing well. Plays like garbage the next season and new back up QB is traded for.

We don't 'draft' QB's in Kansas City.

I would agree with you, except its dorsey, and Reid. They value qbs. Dont even think about rodgers, but the year they drafted Brian Brohm in the second, they drafted Matt flynn in the 7th. Its just the way they are built.....

Chiefnj2 04-29-2013 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9644210)
I would agree with you, except its dorsey, and Reid. They value qbs. Dont even think about rodgers, but the year they drafted Brian Brohm in the second, they drafted Matt flynn in the 7th. Its just the way they are built.....

Except for this year.

Mav 04-29-2013 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9644219)
Except for this year.

Not necessarily, they actually attacked that with a trade and free agency. No need for them to add one they werent sure about. Although they did add bray, so they added three new ones. That satisfy you?

Chiefnj2 04-29-2013 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9644221)
Not necessarily, they actually attacked that with a trade and free agency. No need for them to add one they werent sure about. Although they did add bray, so they added three new ones. That satisfy you?

Not at all. Andy has had a hard on for Smith for quite some time. He chose not to bring in any real challenger. That sucks. It's the same thing Pioli did.

DeezNutz 04-29-2013 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9644219)
Except for this year.

In analyzing the Chiefs, it's best to disregard all empirical evidence.

WV 04-29-2013 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9644206)
Christ, we'll get a comp pick for him if he walks and it would probably be a late 3rd rounder.

If we can't get a high second or better, then he's more valuable on the field for one more season.

:thumb:

BossChief 04-29-2013 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9644202)
Care to make a wager on that?

Foreseeable future = next 4 drafts?

.

Ebolapox 04-29-2013 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9644208)
It's battered fan syndrome.

We don't expect our team to do anything but what they've been doing for 20 years now. Trade for back up... coddle and make excuses for him. Back up makes a probowl in spite of team not really winning or him not really playing well. Plays like garbage the next season and new back up QB is traded for.

We don't 'draft' QB's in Kansas City.

I sometimes question what we would've done had we sucked enough for Luck last year.

I'm not even joking--I'm not convinced we'd have taken Andrew ****ing Luck.

:shake:

DeezNutz 04-29-2013 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9644313)
.

No, foreseeable future is 5 years.

I don't make stupid wagers on ultimately meaningless shit on the web. If I end up being wrong, I won't run away from my error, just like any other time.

WhiteWhale 04-30-2013 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9644210)
I would agree with you, except its dorsey, and Reid. They value qbs. Dont even think about rodgers, but the year they drafted Brian Brohm in the second, they drafted Matt flynn in the 7th. Its just the way they are built.....

That's all fine and dandy and all, but it doesn't mean anything to me or other Chiefs fans.

We can't hang our hat on the past of these two guys. It doesn't do us any good. I have hated this off-season immensely and I didn't want Andy Reid here in the first place. He's going to do what he did in Philly... draft numerous busts because he drafts physical ability over football ability and gives no regard to if the players he is drafting are shitty human beings. Besides almost seeking out bad character players, he's also known for spending ass tons of money in FA for average players.

We didn't get Andy Reid from the first five years in Philly... we got the Andy Reid who nuked the whole team over the past 3 years with insane personnel decisions.

chiefzilla1501 04-30-2013 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9645521)
That's all fine and dandy and all, but it doesn't mean anything to me or other Chiefs fans.

We can't hang our hat on the past of these two guys. It doesn't do us any good. I have hated this off-season immensely and I didn't want Andy Reid here in the first place. He's going to do what he did in Philly... draft numerous busts because he drafts physical ability over football ability and gives no regard to if the players he is drafting are shitty human beings. Besides almost seeking out bad character players, he's also known for spending ass tons of money in FA for average players.

We didn't get Andy Reid from the first five years in Philly... we got the Andy Reid who nuked the whole team over the past 3 years with insane personnel decisions.

I'm so so on Reid. I think he's a terrific coach but we are going to get a lot of late round playoff games where he manages our way to a loss.

But let's be real. It sounds like the free agent frenzy was the doings of the phillyfront office, not rReid. And in fairness, the Eagles have been pretty good at drafting and terrific on offense. Where Reid has struggled is finding a defensive identity after Jim Johnson died. I'm hoping Sutton fixes that. After all, the majority of these busts you're talking about were on defense.

DJ's left nut 04-30-2013 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9644070)
LMAO. The Chiefs aren't drafting a QB in the first in the foreseeable future. No ****ing chance. Even if they're top 5, there will be a WR (or something) that better "warrants" the selection.

You know this, and I know this. Some, however, will perform mental gymnastics to try to argue otherwise.

Eh - depends.

Unlike Pioli, Reid and Dorsey don't seem clearly married to Smith. They've been extremely smart to have him play this season under his old contract. If he struggles or is even a mediocre QB, I think you'll see them quickly start to move away from him as a long-term option.

Pioli was going to come in and put his stamp on this organization, by God. And his very first move was Cassel - he needed to make Cassel a success and was going to do everything in his power to ensure it happened. Reid, on the other hand, has a long track record of performance in this league. It's not all sunshine and roses, but he has cache that Pioli/Haley/Fat**** never had.

He can cut bait on Alex Smith and it won't damage his credibility all that much. As such, if Smith struggles this year, they'll give him 2014 to prove just exactly what he is and if he's not the man, well they'll either like where Bray has gone or I genuinely think they'll turn to a 1st rounder type at QB.

So either Smith will perform admirably (90ish QB rating; 2.5-1 TD/IN ratio and 3500+ yds or so) or we'll go after a first round QB. I can live with either of those eventualities.

Sassy Squatch 04-30-2013 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9645667)
Eh - depends.

Unlike Pioli, Reid and Dorsey don't seem clearly married to Smith. They've been extremely smart to have him play this season under his old contract. If he struggles or is even a mediocre QB, I think you'll see them quickly start to move away from him as a long-term option.

Pioli was going to come in and put his stamp on this organization, by God. And his very first move was Cassel - he needed to make Cassel a success and was going to do everything in his power to ensure it happened. Reid, on the other hand, has a long track record of performance in this league. It's not all sunshine and roses, but he has cache that Pioli/Haley/Fat**** never had.

He can cut bait on Alex Smith and it won't damage his credibility all that much. As such, if Smith struggles this year, they'll give him 2014 to prove just exactly what he is and if he's not the man, well they'll either like where Bray has gone or I genuinely think they'll turn to a 1st rounder type at QB.

So either Smith will perform admirably (90ish QB rating; 2.5-1 TD/IN ratio and 3500+ yds or so) or we'll go after a first round QB. I can live with either of those eventualities.

But we didn't try this year!!!!!!!!!!!

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-30-2013 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 9645673)
But we didn't try this year!!!!!!!!!!!

We didn't try ANY year!!!
Posted via Mobile Device

Sassy Squatch 04-30-2013 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9645679)
We didn't try ANY year!!!
Posted via Mobile Device

http://www.jeremyrscott.com/blogenst...rthnoooooo.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.