ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 6 12 3 456
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs **** The Official Badguy what have you heard thread **** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=282028)

O.city 03-12-2014 07:45 PM
If there was an actual post placed and it broke out, yeah that's probably not good news.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 07:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10485868)
Q

how about a real scoop such as the offensive lineman that Mitch was alluding to?
Be nice.

Dante84 03-12-2014 07:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10485864)
My health insurance ran out
THANKS OBAMA

htismaqe 03-12-2014 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 10485880)
THANKS OBAMA
ROFL

O.city 03-12-2014 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10485864)
My health insurance ran out
You live in KC? Come to the dental school

planetdoc 03-12-2014 08:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10485872)
Be nice.
I was trying to be. I never accused him of posting things after it breaks on twitter. That being said, I think documentation is necessary.

I could start a thread called "Planetdoc's predictions" and just post stuff after its already broken elsewhere. Someone looking thru the thread would assume that I have inside info.

I dont think that TheBadGuy is a twitter reposter, but I do think that its important to document whenever he, or someone else, reposts info. That way, we can all praise those posts that truly provide 'inside info', and provide a warning against those who try to scam the community.

Documentation and verification is healthy for chiefsplanet as well as any community, IMO.

Mother****erJones 03-12-2014 08:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10485898)
You live in KC? Come to the dental school
No, SC

htismaqe 03-12-2014 08:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10485975)
I was trying to be. I never accused him of posting things after it breaks on twitter. That being said, I think documentation is necessary.

I could start a thread called "Planetdoc's predictions" and just post stuff after its already broken elsewhere. Someone looking thru the thread would assume that I have inside info.

I dont think that TheBadGuy is a twitter reposter, but I do think that its important to document whenever he, or someone else, reposts info. That way, we can all praise those posts that truly provide 'inside info', and provide a warning against those who try to scam the community.

Documentation and verification is healthy for chiefsplanet as well as any community, IMO.
TheBadGuy doesn't have to prove anything. It's already proven. TheBadGuy was passing some of us inside information back in the early days, when this board was being formed. We already know he's legit.

Gunther Cunningham told him and a couple other people that he found out he was being fired from TBG's website. That's just one of the absolutely confirmed examples.

You've been here since 2012, so the fact that you're not aware of this isn't surprising.

Sorter 03-12-2014 08:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10485975)
I was trying to be. I never accused him of posting things after it breaks on twitter. That being said, I think documentation is necessary.

I could start a thread called "Planetdoc's predictions" and just post stuff after its already broken elsewhere. Someone looking thru the thread would assume that I have inside info.

I dont think that TheBadGuy is a twitter reposter, but I do think that its important to document whenever he, or someone else, reposts info. That way, we can all praise those posts that truly provide 'inside info', and provide a warning against those who try to scam the community.

Documentation and verification is healthy for chiefsplanet as well as any community, IMO.
After your failure to comprehend basic gap integrity and fronts, no ****ing person on this board would ever think you have
Quote:
inside info
.

planetdoc 03-12-2014 08:29 PM
Good for TheBadGuy.

I still think documentation and verification is important. Its a high standard we should hold ourselves and others too.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 08:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10486013)
Good for TheBadGuy.

I still think documentation and verification is important. Its a high standard we should hold ourselves and others too.
He's already provided his documentation and it has been verified. We know who he is and we know we can trust his information.

Nobody cares what you think is important.

The Bad Guy 03-12-2014 08:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10485975)
I was trying to be. I never accused him of posting things after it breaks on twitter. That being said, I think documentation is necessary.

I could start a thread called "Planetdoc's predictions" and just post stuff after its already broken elsewhere. Someone looking thru the thread would assume that I have inside info.

I dont think that TheBadGuy is a twitter reposter, but I do think that its important to document whenever he, or someone else, reposts info. That way, we can all praise those posts that truly provide 'inside info', and provide a warning against those who try to scam the community.

Documentation and verification is healthy for chiefsplanet as well as any community, IMO.
I always have provided warnings and attributed news to where I get it if it was posted on elsewhere to separate the two.

If I find out any scoops, or get any info told or sent to me, I post it here and only here.

O.city 03-12-2014 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10486013)
Good for TheBadGuy.

I still think documentation and verification is important. Its a high standard we should hold ourselves and others too.
We still think you should document yourself on down the road

planetdoc 03-12-2014 08:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10486031)
I always have provided warnings and attributed news to where I get it to separate the two.

If I find out any scoops, or get any info told or sent to me, I post it here and only here.
thats commendable. I guess I missed the attribution in your earlier post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10485847)
Bethea said the Chiefs were after him, but he wanted to go to San Fran.
since the thread is titled "Badguy what have you heard.." you can see why I (and other readers) might think that this is inside info that you had heard. my mistake.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10486045)
since the thread is titled "Badguy what have you heard.." you can see why I (and other readers) might think that this is inside info that you had heard. my mistake.
Some of his info is inside info.

And he didn't start this thread.

ROFL

The Bad Guy 03-12-2014 08:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10486013)
Good for TheBadGuy.

I still think documentation and verification is important. Its a high standard we should hold ourselves and others too.
Verification of what exactly?

Let's just be clear here - the info I post is not a guarantee of anything. I'm not doing it for any gain whatsoever. I enjoy this place and the people here and want to share info.

LoneWolf 03-12-2014 08:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10486013)
Good for TheBadGuy.

I still think documentation and verification is important. Its a high standard we should hold ourselves and others too.
Why don't you document how many times I've ****ed your mother and I will verify this by the number of used condoms I've left on her nightstand.

O.city 03-12-2014 08:40 PM
Lone wolf with a long ball

The Bad Guy 03-12-2014 08:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10486045)
thats commendable. I guess I missed the attribution in your earlier post.



since the thread is titled "Badguy what have you heard.." you can see why I (and other readers) might think that this is inside info that you had heard. my mistake.
I didn't create the thread and typically if it's something big, I'll create a thread about it.

The Bad Guy 03-12-2014 08:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10486060)
Lone wolf with a long ball
That's a moonshot.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 08:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 10486057)
Why don't you document how many times I've ****ed your mother and I will verify this by the number of used condoms I've left on her nightstand.
ROFL

That's rep.

chiefzilla1501 03-12-2014 08:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10485975)
I was trying to be. I never accused him of posting things after it breaks on twitter. That being said, I think documentation is necessary.

I could start a thread called "Planetdoc's predictions" and just post stuff after its already broken elsewhere. Someone looking thru the thread would assume that I have inside info.

I dont think that TheBadGuy is a twitter reposter, but I do think that its important to document whenever he, or someone else, reposts info. That way, we can all praise those posts that truly provide 'inside info', and provide a warning against those who try to scam the community.

Documentation and verification is healthy for chiefsplanet as well as any community, IMO.
I feel like this should apply to you right now
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/mEB7WbTTlu4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>)

planetdoc 03-12-2014 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10486054)
Verification of what exactly?
that was just a general statement not specifically pertaining to you or to "inside info." For example, if a poster states that a football field is 110 yrds, than readers should verify (with sources) instead of just believing the statement that is said as fact, which could be incorrect. [yes, I know a football field is 100yrds not including the end zone].

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10486054)
Let's just be clear here - the info I post is not a guarantee of anything. I'm not doing it for any gain whatsoever. I enjoy this place and the people here and want to share info.
appreciate it.

planetdoc 03-12-2014 08:46 PM
Its nice that some of you are coming into this thread to defend TheBadGuy, but in reality you are just derailing the topic of this thread.

It might feel like a fun pile on now, but will just be annoying to read later on when you really want to find out "what he has heard."

htismaqe 03-12-2014 08:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10486074)
that was just a general statement not specifically pertaining to you or to "inside info." For example, if a poster states that a football field is 110 yrds, than readers should verify (with sources) instead of just believing the statement that is said as fact, which could be incorrect. [yes, I know a football field is 100yrds not including the end zone].



appreciate it.
ROFL

Some mod needs to change the name of the Lounge to the Lab.

We're all ****ing football scientists.

Sorter 03-12-2014 08:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10486074)
that was just a general statement not specifically pertaining to you or to "inside info." For example, if a poster states that a football field is 110 yrds, than readers should verify (with sources) instead of just believing the statement that is said as fact, which could be incorrect. [yes, I know a football field is 100yrds not including the end zone].



appreciate it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 9468241)
why do you think the chiefs are switching to a 1-gap

kcchiefs.com/news/article-2/QA-with-Defensive-Coordinator-Bob-Sutton/b96e3304-0857-4b4e-b4ac-33b5e7a4d8e4

sutton said:


profootballfocus.com/blog/2012/04/11/fantasy-defensive-personnel-packages-%E2%80%93-part-1/

Although the chiefs base defense was the 2-gap 3-4, they use alot of other looks. For the 2011 season the chiefs used the 3-4 55% of the time and were in a dime (2-3-6) 32% of the time. The jets were only in the 3-4 37% of the time, and than were in a 3-3-5 and a 1-3-7 over 15% of the time. Essentially they were in their nickel and dime defenses 50% of the time.

The big reason that Poe was brought in was because the chiefs were getting gashed against the run in the dime defense. You need two big bodies for that.

Rex Ryan, Rob Ryan all use the multiple fronts of buddy ryan's 4-6. The defensive line 2-gaps.

So why do you think that Sutton will 1-gap?

Please stop posting.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 08:48 PM
*** WE *** derailed this thread.

ROFL

I'm gonna need to see some verification of that.

LoneWolf 03-12-2014 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10486066)
ROFL

That's rep.
Glad I could make someone laugh. The whole free agent palooza and all the defeatist attitudes around here have made me a little irritable. One more post about how we should just concede the division to Denver, and I'm going to start clubbing baby seals.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 08:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 10486101)
Glad I could make someone laugh. The whole free agent palooka and all the defeatist attitudes around here have made me a little irritable. One more post about how we should just concede the division to Denver, and I'm going to start clubbing baby seals.
Dude, you're mad at ME.

:D

planetdoc 03-12-2014 08:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 10486095)
Please stop posting.
no, but thanks for asking nicely.

Sassy Squatch 03-12-2014 08:50 PM
If you could not post in this thread unless you're bad guy that'd be great.

The Bad Guy 03-12-2014 08:52 PM
I just sent a text about this mystery o-lineman that Holtus is talking about.

I also asked about free safety.

Hopefully I hear something tonight.

LoneWolf 03-12-2014 08:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10486103)
Dude, you're mad at ME.

:D
I've read your takes. I understand frustration, but the "we're ****ed" posts are the ones that really bug me. It's ****ing March for ****s sake.

I haven't seen you post the "we're ****ed" post yet.

O.city 03-12-2014 08:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10486117)
I just sent a text about this mystery o-lineman that Holtus is talking about.

I also asked about free safety.

Hopefully I hear something tonight.
Send a selfie dic pic along with it, maybe get a faster response?

chiefzilla1501 03-12-2014 08:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 10486120)
I've read your takes. I understand frustration, but the "we're ****ed" posts are the ones that really bug me. It's ****ing March for ****s sake.

I haven't seen you post the "we're ****ed" post yet.
We're ****ed.
We've spent five years bitching about the unimportance of a 5 technique and offensive linemen. But we are ****ed when we lose them.

Mother****erJones 03-12-2014 08:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10486117)
I just sent a text about this mystery o-lineman that Holtus is talking about.

I also asked about free safety.

Hopefully I hear something tonight.
Thanks, and get a baby seal for LoneWolf....he's ornery

LoneWolf 03-12-2014 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 10486109)
If you could not post in this thread unless you're bad guy that'd be great.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mZoVER6Ui_...res-707578.jpg

TLO 03-12-2014 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10486117)
I just sent a text about this mystery o-lineman that Holtus is talking about.

I also asked about free safety.

Hopefully I hear something tonight.
:clap:

Sorter 03-12-2014 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10486104)
no, but thanks for asking nicely.
ROFL @ not understanding the relationship between your quoted posts.


Almost as funny as this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10450608)
I disagree. I see Donald as a 3tech. I dont think he has a place in a 3-4 Defense.

http://simmqb.files.wordpress.com/20...pg?w=800&h=215


http://simmqb.files.wordpress.com/20...pg?w=800&h=250

Look how wide Houston and Hali line up when they are both rushing.
I want a big body paired up with Poe like Hagemon because they are responsible for alot of space.
Link to the planetdoc's idiocy being destroyed with actual sources. LMAO
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...281603&page=20

htismaqe 03-12-2014 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 10486109)
If you could not post in this thread unless you're bad guy that'd be great.
ROFL

htismaqe 03-12-2014 09:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10486117)
I just sent a text about this mystery o-lineman that Holtus is talking about.

I also asked about free safety.

Hopefully I hear something tonight.
Sweetness.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 09:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 10486120)
I've read your takes. I understand frustration, but the "we're ****ed" posts are the ones that really bug me. It's ****ing March for ****s sake.

I haven't seen you post the "we're ****ed" post yet.
That's implied in every post I make. :D

htismaqe 03-12-2014 09:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10486127)
We're ****ed.
We've spent five years bitching about the unimportance of a 5 technique and offensive linemen. But we are ****ed when we lose them and try to replace them with a warm, wet fart.
FYP.

planetdoc 03-12-2014 09:01 PM
sorter, you follow me around in different threads with that or "allude" to those posts. I think you misunderstand and think its a "gotcha" moment. In anycase I'll happily address it (as I have) in the original thread. I'm not taking "the bait" and arguing over posts in other threads. that is poor form.

Mother****erJones 03-12-2014 09:02 PM
Please be Alex Mack

BossChief 03-12-2014 09:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10485847)
Bethea said the Chiefs were after him, but he wanted to go to San Fran.
That's scary, actually.

So we were interested in spending 6 million a year on an average safety like Bethea and dropped 3/yr on Mays, but spending 9/yr on Byrd is overspending?

That makes me want to punt a kitten.

BossChief 03-12-2014 09:05 PM
FTR IMO Abdullah > Bethea at any price.

LoneWolf 03-12-2014 09:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10486154)
That makes me want to punt a kitten.
Baby seals, man. They relieve so much more frustration than kittens.

Sorter 03-12-2014 09:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 10486145)
sorter, you follow me around in different threads with that or "allude" to those posts. I think you misunderstand and think its a "gotcha" moment. In anycase I'll happily address it (as I have) in the original thread. I'm not taking "the bait" and arguing over posts in other threads. that is poor form.
LMAO.


You argued incessantly about how Aaron Donald couldn't play in a 3-4 because we exclusively use DEs as 5 techniques and he's just a 3 tech.


You then posted a picture of of the Chiefs D from last year in a 46 with both of our DEs in a 3 technique. You also failed to understand after it was repeatedly explained to you by a variety of different posters about how often our team is in sub personnel. Hilariously, one of your first posts on this site was claiming that Sutton wouldn't 1-gap and then posted how the Jets were in subs for 60% of the time. It's hilarious because guess what...

Teams. Typically. Don't. ****ing. 2 Gap. In. Sub. Personnel.

Even more so in college and after.




Essentially, you're a ****ing moron.

The Bad Guy 03-12-2014 09:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10486154)
That's scary, actually.

So we were interested in spending 6 million a year on an average safety like Bethea and dropped 3/yr on Mays, but spending 9/yr on Byrd is overspending?

That makes me want to punt a kitten.
I don't think it's that simple.

Bethea said Chiefs were interested, but he wanted to be a 49er. That could mean that 49ers offered more. I highly doubt Chiefs are blowing that kind of coin on Bethea.

planetdoc 03-12-2014 09:10 PM
sorter, I bumped the original thread for your convenience, so we can discuss that there. here is a link
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...281603&page=47]

once again, I'm not addressing topics from other threads in here.

BossChief 03-12-2014 09:10 PM
I'm in iowa, wolf.

You know how much I had to pay to have a baby seal flown in when we signed Dunta Robinson?

I can get kittens far more easily.

BossChief 03-12-2014 09:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10486170)
I don't think it's that simple.

Bethea said Chiefs were interested, but he wanted to be a 49er. That could mean that 49ers offered more. I highly doubt Chiefs are blowing that kind of coin on Bethea.
Dunta Robinson

Buzz 03-12-2014 09:11 PM
Dude almost sounds like "Chincey the Turd" mult, trying to talk football.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 09:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10486158)
FTR IMO Abdullah > Bethea at any price.
http://instntrply.com/wp-content/upl...40-460x260.jpg

chiefzilla1501 03-12-2014 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10486144)
FYP.
We replaced a bunch of guys who were silent farts with warm wet farts.

And free agency and the draft aren't even close to over yet.

LoneWolf 03-12-2014 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10486173)
I'm in iowa, wolf.

You know how much I had to pay to have a baby seal flown in when we signed Dunta Robinson?

I can get kittens far more easily.
I can sympathize with the economics. Have you ever considered a baby seal costume for the kittens?

BossChief 03-12-2014 09:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 10486185)
I can sympathize with the economics. Have you ever considered a baby seal costume for the kittens?
No. I can always shave them and paint them with black latex paint before I punt them, though.

That might take some of the edge off.

Iowanian 03-12-2014 09:20 PM
It seems to me the GM did a pretty damn good job of bringing in some late bloomers last year.


I'm not going to blink about what they're doing until I see the team on the field in week 1.

BossChief 03-12-2014 09:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10486182)
I know you don't think much of Abdullah, but he was offered a contract that averaged almost 5/yr by the Vikings before he went on his pilgrimage and by the end of the year the guy was a solid player for us and made a lot of plays.

He is also 2 years younger than Bethea.

LoneWolf 03-12-2014 09:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowanian (Post 10486215)
It seems to me the GM did a pretty damn good job of bringing in some late bloomers last year.


I'm not going to blink about what they're doing until I see the team on the field in week 1.
The voice of reason. :thumb:

Mother****erJones 03-12-2014 09:23 PM
I like Abdullah a lot just more as depth. He showed out against Indy

Iowanian 03-12-2014 09:24 PM
Stop trying to kiss me, you big squishy gaybo!

LoneWolf 03-12-2014 09:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowanian (Post 10486230)
Stop trying to kiss me, you big squishy gaybo!
Can we at least hold hands? I feel so alone.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10486216)
I know you don't think much of Abdullah, but he was offered a contract that averaged almost 5/yr by the Vikings before he went on his pilgrimage and by the end of the year the guy was a solid player for us and made a lot of plays.

He is also 2 years younger than Bethea.
He's a solid backup. They paid him like one. John Dorsey and Andy Reid agree with me. :D

htismaqe 03-12-2014 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10486184)
And free agency and the draft aren't even close to over yet.
Can't wait to draft Zach Martin! **** yeah!

Mother****erJones 03-12-2014 09:31 PM
Kevin Harlan said today on 810 that if there's a really good tackle at 23 that falls to us, well have no problem taking him. Oh man can't imagine taking OTs 2 years in a row

LoneWolf 03-12-2014 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10486246)
Can't wait to draft Zach Martin! **** yeah!
Never going to happen.

OldSchool 03-12-2014 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10486246)
Can't wait to draft Zach Martin! **** yeah!
Hmm, we could pass on him if we could trade back, still pick a receiver first, and land Joel Bitonio, Billy Turner, or Brandon Thomas with our 2nd pick.

That's assuming they make it there.

BossChief 03-12-2014 09:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10486245)
He's a solid backup. They paid him like one. John Dorsey and Andy Reid agree with me. :D
I just think we got a huge bargain because other teams question his devotion to the sport after walking away previously.

You're right though, he was paid as a backup player and if that's what he ends up being, we will be in really good shape going forward.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 09:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10486253)
Kevin Harlan said today on 810 that if there's a really good tackle at 23 that falls to us, well have no problem taking him. Oh man can't imagine taking OTs 2 years in a row
Harlan is like that. Take it with a grain of salt. I know everybody hates the term, but Kevin Harlan's picture is in the dictionary next to "True Fan".

He's basically Holthus without the random goofiness.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10486257)
Hmm, we could pass on him if we could trade back, still pick a receiver first, and land Joel Bitonio, Billy Turner, or Brandon Thomas with our 2nd pick.

That's assuming they make it there.
I'm not down with drafting a lineman anywhere in this draft. I wanted to (hopefully) improve there. If we're going the young, unproven route, we have guys already on the roster that can do that.

The draft needs to focus on WR, CB, TE, pass rusher, not necessarily in that order.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10486272)
I just think we got a huge bargain because other teams question his devotion to the sport after walking away previously.

You're right though, he was paid as a backup player and if that's what he ends up being, we will be in really good shape going forward.
I got a little carried away this afternoon.

Abdullah certainly isn't a bad player. He is what he is.

I overreacted to the overreaction. I find the dancing banana thing really annoying for some reason.

chiefzilla1501 03-12-2014 09:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10486246)
Can't wait to draft Zach Martin! **** yeah!
Trust me, that's not a move that would make me happy

OldSchool 03-12-2014 09:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10486298)
I'm not down with drafting a lineman anywhere in this draft. I wanted to (hopefully) improve there. If we're going the young, unproven route, we have guys already on the roster that can do that.

The draft needs to focus on WR, CB, TE, pass rusher, not necessarily in that order.
I would say that OL is a lot more of a need area than TE is. Unless Ebron falls to us or we take a late round flyer on a guy like AC Leonard, I don't want to see us even touch that position. I highly doubt that Dorsey and Co will give up on the Fasano and Kelce pairing so soon also.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 10:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10486318)
I would say that OL is a lot more of a need area than TE is.
We have young, unproven guys on the line. We've got Kelce and shit at TE.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10486318)
I highly doubt that Dorsey and Co will give up on the Fasano and Kelce pairing so soon also.
You know how I feel about Kelce but let's put that aside for a second...

Don't ever mention Fasano like that again. He's a scrub. The hope for that position lies with Kelce. Even McGrath is better than Fasano.

:D

OldSchool 03-12-2014 10:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10486332)
We have young, unproven guys on the line. We've got Kelce and shit at TE.



You know how I feel about Kelce but let's put that aside for a second...

Don't ever mention Fasano like that again. He's a scrub. The hope for that position lies with Kelce. Even McGrath is better than Fasano.

:D
I know we may not agree with how they view our TE position but, like I said, unless Ebron falls into our laps, we won't even touch the TE position in the first 5 rounds.

Dorsey, Reid, and CO all believe that Kelce is the answer and Fasano is a solid starter who was just banged up.

BossChief 03-12-2014 10:05 PM
You obviously don't know anything about Amaro. That guy would be amazing in this offense.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 10:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10486338)
Fasano is a solid starter who was just banged up.
The story of his career.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 10:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10486338)
Dorsey, Reid, and CO all believe that Kelce is the answer
By the way, this sentence is completely absurd. We've been told all day to be patient, we have no idea what Dorsey and Reid are thinking. That applies to positive statements as well.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:07 AM.
Page 3 of 6 12 3 456
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.