ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs release KeiVarae Russell (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=302214)

ToxSocks 09-14-2016 10:27 AM

Also, lets not pretend that this is some sort of habit of Dorsey's. This idea that the scouting department is failing is dumb considering Dorsey has found some jewels in the 3rd that have stuck around just fine...

raybec 4 09-14-2016 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12425523)
Going back to this, yes, he was suspended for academic fraud. Terez Paylor also indicated that Russell was having problems with the terminology, which was supposedly the reason why he was behind.

Pure speculation but if you put 2 and 2 together, maybe he has a learning disability, which led to cheating and his issue with terminology.

Just a guess.

That's kind of where I was going, but I wasn't sure he was involved. It could be that he just can't make the mental leap from ND to the scheme Sutton runs. Or it could outline some character issues as well.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimNasium (Post 12425525)
I'm not suggesting this is the case but didn't we cut and then resign a couple of players to the roster multiple times last season? I wonder if Dorsey tries to extend his roster based on the week's opponent?

As I mentioned earlier, had Moses been on the 53 for Week 1, his salary would have been guaranteed for the entire season.

By signing him in Week 2, they can release and re-sign him at any time and only owe him one week's salary.

Warrick 09-14-2016 10:28 AM

I never did like that kid's holdout, if we are lucky enough to put him on the PS this might turn out to be a good move. Not only that, but it sends a msg to the rest of the players.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A. Chieffan (Post 12425526)
I think he's actually a good player Dane. Hence his high draft rating. Perhaps the whole world was wrong about him

Those two are mutually exclusive: Draft position does not equal being a good player.

By that measure, an undrafted college free agent like Charcandrick West isn't a good player because he wasn't drafted.

ct 09-14-2016 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12425523)
Going back to this, yes, he was suspended for academic fraud. Terez Paylor also indicated that Russell was having problems with the terminology, which was supposedly the reason why he was behind.

Pure speculation but if you put 2 and 2 together, maybe he has a learning disability, which led to cheating and his issue with terminology.

Just a guess.

i brought this up a few days ago in the russell thread, somebody pointed out he was cleared by the ncaa and reinstated? i have no other info or confirmation one way or the other.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12425527)
Also, lets not pretend that this is some sort of habit of Dorsey's. This idea that the scouting department is failing is dumb considering Dorsey has found some jewels in the 3rd that have stuck around just fine...

And regardless of the round, he's found plenty of secondary players in the draft and on the scrap heap that contributed to the Chiefs success each and every year he's been in KC.

The Franchise 09-14-2016 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12425373)
6 million? Yup

https://www.google.com/amp/www.arrow...android-att-us

Stick to being wrong about Notre Dame players you dead beat pillowbitergot

I'm the deadbeat? Go get those teeth fixed and build up those biceps, you worthless reerun.

Beef Supreme 09-14-2016 10:30 AM

That bastion of truth and justice, the NCAA.

The Franchise 09-14-2016 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12425536)
Those two are mutually exclusive: Draft position does not equal being a good player.

By that measure, an undrafted college free agent like Charcandrick West isn't a good player because he wasn't drafted.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ct (Post 12425539)
i brought this up a few days ago in the russell thread, somebody pointed out he was cleared by the ncaa and reinstated? i have no other info or confirmation one way or the other.

He was cleared by the NCAA.

Hoover 09-14-2016 10:32 AM

Wow.

L.A. Chieffan 09-14-2016 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12425536)
Those two are mutually exclusive: Draft position does not equal being a good player.

By that measure, an undrafted college free agent like Charcandrick West isn't a good player because he wasn't drafted.

I was using that just as part of his analysis. Of course logically it doesn't mean undrafted players are automatically bad players. I watched several ND games, as I assume Dorsey did which is why they invested so highly to begin with. I don't have access to the resources Dorsey has, coaches, interviews, workouts, etc...yet he still picked him.

Sassy Squatch 09-14-2016 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12425542)
I'm the deadbeat? Go get those teeth fixed and build up those biceps, you worthless reerun.

Gawdayum.

BWillie 09-14-2016 10:37 AM

At least Ned Yost is not affiliated with the Chiefs.

raybec 4 09-14-2016 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12425542)
I'm the deadbeat? Go get those teeth fixed and build up those biceps, you worthless reerun.

<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MhBM7H-ggvY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

The Franchise 09-14-2016 10:40 AM

How many posts a day does Billay claim to want to suck Dane's dick?

JCBRAVE 09-14-2016 10:40 AM

Hi guys, Titans fan here

as some may know the Titans have #1 waiver priority at the moment and our CB depth is as scary as it gets, would you guys think Russell would be a viable option for us?

MIAdragon 09-14-2016 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCBRAVE (Post 12425570)
Hi guys, Titans fan here

as some may know the Titans have #1 waiver priority at the moment and our CB depth is as scary as it gets, would you guys think Russell would be a viable option for us?

no

staylor26 09-14-2016 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12425569)
How many posts a day does Billay claim to want to suck Dane's dick?

Yea he clearly fantasizes blowing Dane.

DJ's left nut 09-14-2016 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCBRAVE (Post 12425570)
Hi guys, Titans fan here

as some may know the Titans have #1 waiver priority at the moment and our CB depth is as scary as it gets, would you guys think Russell would be a viable option for us?

PM Bob Dole.

BWillie 09-14-2016 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCBRAVE (Post 12425570)
Hi guys, Titans fan here

as some may know the Titans have #1 waiver priority at the moment and our CB depth is as scary as it gets, would you guys think Russell would be a viable option for us?

Well, after Marcus Peters. We have terrible CBs...even though I think Chiefs fans underrated Phillip Gaines. Nonetheless, we have a bunch of chodes when we go into the dime and we STILL cut Russell who was a 3rd round pick this year. Speaks volumes about how much the staff was unimpressed by him.

DaFace 09-14-2016 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCBRAVE (Post 12425570)
Hi guys, Titans fan here

as some may know the Titans have #1 waiver priority at the moment and our CB depth is as scary as it gets, would you guys think Russell would be a viable option for us?

It's honestly tough to say. He obviously had some level of talent coming out of college or we wouldn't have drafted him. It sounds like he's not that smart of a guy, as the most public criticism we've heard about him is that he's had a lot of trouble grasping the terminology the Chiefs use. Aside from that, he largely just couldn't get on the field above other guys we drafted later, so he pretty much showed the fans nothing.

CaliforniaChief 09-14-2016 10:55 AM

File this post under the "Things that happen in Madden but not real life" category.

Would we trade Jamaal Charles straight-up for a cornerback? I love Jamaal, but if he's back...well...I think we've got a rich talent pool at RB right now.

Just spitballing.

ToxSocks 09-14-2016 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12425536)
Those two are mutually exclusive: Draft position does not equal being a good player.

By that measure, an undrafted college free agent like Charcandrick West isn't a good player because he wasn't drafted.

This.

The Chiefs probably didn't expect DJ White to beat out Russel. It happens. I'm happy to see Dorsey have the balls to move on from a high round pick.

And FWIW, i expect him to be added to the PS.

OnTheWarpath15 09-14-2016 10:56 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&quot;We felt it was the best thing to do for <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash">#Chiefs</a> right now.&quot;<br><br>~ Andy Reid on release of KeiVarae Russell, adding it was &quot;football decision.&quot;</p>&mdash; BJ Kissel (@ChiefsReporter) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChiefsReporter/status/776101110620704768">September 14, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

notorious 09-14-2016 11:02 AM

Zero



****s



Given

The Franchise 09-14-2016 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 12425611)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&quot;We felt it was the best thing to do for <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash">#Chiefs</a> right now.&quot;<br><br>~ Andy Reid on release of KeiVarae Russell, adding it was &quot;football decision.&quot;</p>&mdash; BJ Kissel (@ChiefsReporter) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChiefsReporter/status/776101110620704768">September 14, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

There had to have been an off the field issue then.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 11:03 AM

The other thing to keep in mind, guys, is that without trading out of the first round, which resulted in the Chris Jones selection in the second round, the Chiefs wouldn't have even had a third round selection to make.

That trade also opened up the opportunity to draft multiple 4th and 5th round players, all of whom made the roster, save for Kevin Hogan, who most likely wouldn't have been drafted by the Chiefs, either, had it not been for all of Dorsey's moves.

Candiru 09-14-2016 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12425634)
There had to have been an off the field issue then.

Yep, off the field the Chiefs kept telling him he was terrible on the field.

notorious 09-14-2016 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Candiru (Post 12425645)
Yep, off the field the Chiefs kept telling him he was terrible on the field.

Funny guy!

Mother****erJones 09-14-2016 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12425523)
Going back to this, yes, he was suspended for academic fraud. Terez Paylor also indicated that Russell was having problems with the terminology, which was supposedly the reason why he was behind.

Pure speculation but if you put 2 and 2 together, maybe he has a learning disability, which led to cheating and his issue with terminology.

Just a guess.

Very plausible possibility.

Stryker 09-14-2016 11:12 AM

What? No "Well bye"?
ROFL

DJ's left nut 09-14-2016 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12425635)
The other thing to keep in mind, guys, is that without trading out of the first round, which resulted in the Chris Jones selection in the second round, the Chiefs wouldn't have even had a third round selection to make.

That trade also opened up the opportunity to draft multiple 4th and 5th round players, all of whom made the roster, save for Kevin Hogan, who most likely wouldn't have been drafted by the Chiefs, either, had it not been for all of Dorsey's moves.

For as hell bent as Dorsey was on getting back into the third round (seriously, Captain Ahab wasn't as fixated as Dorsey was on the third round), he sure shit it away, didn't he?

So in effect, the Chiefs gave away an additional year of team control of Chris Jones for....nothing. Nothing at all. And that's what I hated about that trade down to begin with.

It wasn't Chris Jones, it was that if you really think Jones is a player, you just take him in the first and leverage the value of the player option to save yourself a shitload in the long-run. Agents are digging their heels in on franchise numbers now that they've gotten so high. The franchise tag isn't going to be much of a benefit for teams going forward. So if you can't get guys extended early, you're stuck fighting in the market for them.

One way to help get that extension is the threat of the 5th year option (see Fisher's deal, and Fisher's deal was even harder because the 5th year option for him was more than twice what it would be for a late first rounder).

The trade down failed.

O.city 09-14-2016 11:25 AM

So they brought back moses, which is nice.

I don't see them trading for anyone.

scho63 09-14-2016 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12425351)
We're going to see more and more of this moving forward, as the Chiefs will have more draft picks than spots available due to the quality of the roster.

:clap::clap:

Direckshun 09-14-2016 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 12425604)
It's honestly tough to say. He obviously had some level of talent coming out of college or we wouldn't have drafted him. It sounds like he's not that smart of a guy, as the most public criticism we've heard about him is that he's had a lot of trouble grasping the terminology the Chiefs use. Aside from that, he largely just couldn't get on the field above other guys we drafted later, so he pretty much showed the fans nothing.

You'd have felt like that was something the scouting staff could have sniffed out, though...

The real truth is almost certainly that Russell ****ed up in some really severe way.

Direckshun 09-14-2016 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12425634)
There had to have been an off the field issue then.

My thought process as well.

The Franchise 09-14-2016 11:30 AM

Well I'm done with the Adopt a Chief program.

Last year I had Gaines and he tore his ACl. Picked Russell this year.

I'm bowing out.

RunKC 09-14-2016 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12425688)
For as hell bent as Dorsey was on getting back into the third round (seriously, Captain Ahab wasn't as fixated as Dorsey was on the third round), he sure shit it away, didn't he?

So in effect, the Chiefs gave away an additional year of team control of Chris Jones for....nothing. Nothing at all. And that's what I hated about that trade down to begin with.

It wasn't Chris Jones, it was that if you really think Jones is a player, you just take him in the first and leverage the value of the player option to save yourself a shitload in the long-run. Agents are digging their heels in on franchise numbers now that they've gotten so high. The franchise tag isn't going to be much of a benefit for teams going forward. So if you can't get guys extended early, you're stuck fighting in the market for them.

One way to help get that extension is the threat of the 5th year option (see Fisher's deal, and Fisher's deal was even harder because the 5th year option for him was more than twice what it would be for a late first rounder).

The trade down failed.

I think this hinges on Parker Ehinger, who we drafted with through the compensation for that trade.

And honestly the kid looks like he could be a solid G after a year in the weight room. We'll have to see.

staylor26 09-14-2016 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12425711)
I think this hinges on Parker Ehinger, who we drafted with through the compensation for that trade.

And honestly the kid looks like he could be a solid G after a year in the weight room. We'll have to see.

Also Murray.

Dorsey obviously felt he can get some 3rd round talent with those early 4th round picks, so I disagree with DJ.

Mr. Flopnuts 09-14-2016 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12425542)
I'm the deadbeat? Go get those teeth fixed and build up those biceps, you worthless reerun.

ROFL

Mr. Flopnuts 09-14-2016 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12425634)
There had to have been an off the field issue then.

Totally agree. He ****ed up in some way. This isn't just his progression over the last 4 months or so. Not on a 3rd rounder.

OldSchool 09-14-2016 11:38 AM

Well, that was fast.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12425688)
The trade down failed.

Without the trade down, the Chiefs don't have at least three, if not four, of the following players:

Ehinger
Murray
Robinson
Hill
White
Nicolas

Let's say they took Jones at #1 and Russell at #2. Based on their draft positions, the draft would have looked like this:

1. Jones
2. Russell
3. ----
4. Eric Murray
5. Kevin Hogan
6. DJ White.

So, no Ehinger (hole at LG), no developmental receiver in Robinson, no speedster in Tyreek Hill and no developmental OLBer in Nicolas, Hogan cut.

Add to that, Russell still may have been cut.

The trade was far from a failure.

Direckshun 09-14-2016 11:40 AM

Right now, the 2016 draft class:

2. DE Chris Jones -- solid hit so far
3. CB Keivarae Russell -- epic fail
4. OG Parker Ehinger -- solid hit so far
4. S Eric Murray -- actual potential
4. WR Demarcus Robinson -- struggling
5. QB Kevin Hogan -- on another roster
5. WR Tyreek Hill -- solid hit so far
6. CB D.J. White -- actual potential
6. OLB Dadi Nicholas -- actual potential

Still looks like an okay draft if Russell completely flatlines.

Shocking he was released so soon. He had to have ****ed up in a very serious way.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 12425736)
5. QB Kevin Hogan -- on another roster

Hogan is on the Browns Practice Squad, not roster.

In58men 09-14-2016 11:44 AM

Not a very good draft for Chiefs. No future players.

Direckshun 09-14-2016 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12425747)
Hogan is on the Browns Practice Squad, not roster.

Fair enough. I suppose at this time he is our 4th QB until someone needs him on their 53.

Sandy Vagina 09-14-2016 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 12425736)
Right now, the 2016 draft class:

2. DE Chris Jones -- solid hit so far
3. CB Keivarae Russell -- epic fail
4. OG Parker Ehinger -- solid hit so far
4. S Eric Murray -- actual potential
4. WR Demarcus Robinson -- struggling
5. QB Kevin Hogan -- on another roster
5. WR Tyreek Hill -- solid hit so far
6. CB D.J. White -- actual potential
6. OLB Dadi Nicholas -- actual potential

Still looks like an okay draft if Russell completely flatlines.

Shocking he was released so soon. He had to have ****ed up in a very serious way.

nitpick:

Was never a fan or not of him, but why doesn't WR Robinson get more slack? It's not like he's had much sample size, or shown to be good or bad, really. Not like he was expected to step right in as a WR1-3 contributor.

Direckshun 09-14-2016 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12425760)
nitpick:

Was never a fan or not of him, but why doesn't WR Robinson get more slack? It's not like he's had much sample size, or shown to be good or bad, really. Not like he was expected to step right in as a WR1-3 contributor.

I can only judge personally based on the preseason and the camp practice I saw, so my opinion (as always) is not definitive.

Robinson just isn't getting separation.

Bowser 09-14-2016 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 12425752)
Not a very good draft for Chiefs. No future players.

http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/n...GIFSoupcom.gif

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 12425764)

Trolling again, I see.

How much longer before his stupid ass is banned, again, for trolling?

Hammock Parties 09-14-2016 11:51 AM

calling Reek and Ehinger hits LMAO

right now they're giving us UDFA play

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12425771)
calling Reek and Ehinger hits LMAO

right now they're giving us UDFA play

And now the other troll chimes in.

:facepalm:

When will the Mods take out the trash?

Sandy Vagina 09-14-2016 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 12425763)
I can only judge personally based on the preseason and the camp practice I saw, so my opinion (as always) is not definitive.

Robinson just isn't getting separation.

ah, okay.. well, I can respect this very early assessment. We'll see..

staylor26 09-14-2016 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 12425752)
Not a very good draft for Chiefs. No future players.

You're so ****ing stupid it's scary.

staylor26 09-14-2016 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12425771)
calling Reek and Ehinger hits LMAO

right now they're giving us UDFA play

UDFA play?

How often do UDFA's score TD's in their first game?

Also, how often does a UDFA start from day one on the OL?

Bowser 09-14-2016 11:55 AM

TIL that when one rookie cracks the starting lineup on offense and another scores a touchdown on his very first NFL reception, it equals them being the equivalent of a couple of UDFAs. Amazing.

Bowser 09-14-2016 11:56 AM

Dammit, staylor. I'm shitting in the bag destined for your porch as we speak.

Hammock Parties 09-14-2016 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12425777)
UDFA play?

How often do UDFA's score TD's in their first game?

Also, how often does a UDFA start from day one on the OL?

any scab off the street could have scored that TD

Ehinger is only starting because we have a dearth of talent at that position. Desperation. He is the weak link by far.

Chief Pagan 09-14-2016 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 12425606)
Would we trade Jamaal Charles straight-up for a cornerback? I love Jamaal, but if he's back...well...I think we've got a rich talent pool at RB right now.

Sure. We just need to find a 29 year old CB with a blown out knee that wasn't active week 1 because they are still trying to come back from the injury.

DJ's left nut 09-14-2016 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12425734)
Without the trade down, the Chiefs don't have at least three, if not four, of the following players:

Ehinger
Murray
Robinson
Hill
White
Nicolas

Let's say they took Jones at #1 and Russell at #2. Based on their draft positions, the draft would have looked like this:

1. Jones
2. Russell
3. ----
4. Eric Murray
5. Kevin Hogan
6. DJ White.

So, no Ehinger (hole at LG), no developmental receiver in Robinson, no speedster in Tyreek Hill and no developmental OLBer in Nicolas, Hogan cut.

Add to that, Russell still may have been cut.

The trade was far from a failure.

Why would you assume that not making the Jones trade would've stopped them from making the other trade out of the 2nd? And trying to stretch this exercise into "well they'd have just taken Russell in the 2nd" is obviously just driving an agenda. No, they wouldn't have; there were 15 picks made in between that 2nd rounder and where we took Russell, you really believe none of them were on our board?

They gained all of 2 picks from that deal, how do you figure that it cost us 4 players? If they don't make the deal, it's not Ehinger they lose but Murray (they'd have just taken Ehinger at 106 instead of 105). But if Murray slides to them at 126, they probably take him instead of Robinson. If they don't get Robinson, maybe they take Hill instead of Hogan and then DJ White with the next pick.

Who the hell knows how it would've gone, but it could've just as easily been some chaff that we lost out on.

It's just not worth giving up that year of control for more JAGs, not on a team that's this deep. You have even acknowledged that it's going to be an issue going forward due to roster depth.

Volume of picks isn't as important as quality and maximizing their value.

staylor26 09-14-2016 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 12425785)
Dammit, staylor. I'm shitting in the bag destined for your porch as we speak.

LMAO

SAUTO 09-14-2016 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12425771)
calling Reek and Ehinger hits LMAO

right now they're giving us UDFA play

Yeah udfa's routinely accelerate to the end zone like tyreek did Sunday

SAUTO 09-14-2016 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12425786)
any scab off the street could have scored that TD

You are ****ing stupid.

jjchieffan 09-14-2016 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12425771)
calling Reek and Ehinger hits LMAO

right now they're giving us UDFA play

Wow Clay!! Trolling hard today aren't you? Calling a guard who won the starting job in his very first NFL game and a speedy receiver/returner who had the first touchdown that started the come back UDFA play is just asinine. But I get it. You have to be the troll. It's what you come here for. We will just have to roll our eyes and shake our heads when we see your off the wall opinions.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-14-2016 12:03 PM

Dude cut them both in in Madden. That's his eval tool.

Hammock Parties 09-14-2016 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12425799)
You are ****ing stupid.

Really? There was one guy there to tackle him and he got a pinky on him.

I wasn't impressed but standards around here have fallen so....not surprised.

Bowser 09-14-2016 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12425801)
Dude cut them both in in Madden. That's his eval tool.

I thought that job belonged to Inmem?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/oShTJ90fC34" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

staylor26 09-14-2016 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12425807)
Really? There was one guy there to tackle him and he got a pinky on him.

I wasn't impressed but standards around here have fallen so....not surprised.

Even the announcers were drooling over Hill. You're a ****ing moron.

Bowser 09-14-2016 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12425807)
Really? There was one guy there to tackle him and he got a pinky on him.

I wasn't impressed but standards around here have fallen so....not surprised.

Please, do enlighten us with your expected standards for what a fifth round wide receiver should play to....

Pasta Little Brioni 09-14-2016 12:08 PM

Oh and Hill develops his OVR quickly if you pump up AWR and is lethal on returns. So he failed there too...

Hammock Parties 09-14-2016 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12425813)
Even the announcers were drooling over Hill. You're a ****ing moron.

They were not. But, all entitled to their opinion. Have a nice day, friend.

Hammock Parties 09-14-2016 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 12425820)
Please, do enlighten us with your expected standards for what a fifth round wide receiver should play to....

I'd like to see him do something beyond screen passes, that's all.

I felt like I was watching McCluster.

staylor26 09-14-2016 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12425823)
They were not. But, all entitled to their opinion. Have a nice day, friend.

Ummm yes they were. That's a fact. Not an opinion. Go back and listen after his last return.

RunKC 09-14-2016 12:09 PM

It's amazing how people just keep replying to Clay even when they know he's clearly trolling.

Hammock Parties 09-14-2016 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12425827)
Ummm yes they were. That's a fact. Not an opinion.

After the TD?

staylor26 09-14-2016 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12425830)
After the TD?

No after his last PR.

Meatloaf 09-14-2016 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12425786)
any scab off the street could have scored that TD

Ehinger is only starting because we have a dearth of talent at that position. Desperation. He is the weak link by far.

C'mon, smell. I know you enjoy employing the contrarian philosophy, but methinks you've gone over the edge on this one. Do you not understand that you lose any/all credibility when you make these outlandish assessments. I guess you just don't care.....which is ok by me. It's just that I know you have more to offer than these sorry observations. Why are you wasting your talents like this? I suspect it's just for your own fun and games, but it is sad to see you so obsessed with such trivialities rather than sharing your honest opinions with the CP community.

Hopefully, someday you'll find more entertainment in sharing honest opinions rather than simply tossing stuff out there to induce attention and angst.

Bowser 09-14-2016 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12425826)
I'd like to see him do something beyond screen passes, that's all.

I felt like I was watching McCluster.

He looked exactly like McCluster, except how he is much thicker, faster, and harder to bring down than McCluster could ever hope to be. Other than that, you nailed it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.