ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs MEDIA REACTIONS: Chiefs Early Draft Losers on NFLN (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=283607)

-King- 05-12-2014 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10625332)
Walterfootball's take.

DeAnthony Thomas in the 4th was a reach?


Al....righty then.

-King- 05-12-2014 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 10625718)
I think some of it has to do with people getting hung up over the "DE" position. I'm still seeing people that think he is a 3-4 DE and not knowing that he will play OLB and is a good pass rusher. I still see people writing that he was drafted to replace TJax. :shake:

This. I had to walk away from a coworker cause I couldn't get it through his head Ford would play OLB.

Him: "BUT THE TV SAID DE!!!"

Me: "Yeah, he played DE in college, but he'll switch to OLB just like Tamba switched a few years ago"

Him: "BUT IT SAID DE!!!"

Me: :facepalm:

htismaqe 05-12-2014 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10625734)
This. I had to walk away from a coworker cause I couldn't get it through his head Ford would play OLB.

Him: "BUT THE TV SAID DE!!!"

Me: "Yeah, he played DE in college, but he'll switch to OLB just like Tamba switched a few years ago"

Him: "BUT IT SAID DE!!!"

Me: :facepalm:

Let me guess, you said "He was a DE in a 4-3 defense" and they got all glossy-eyed...

The Franchise 05-12-2014 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10625734)
This. I had to walk away from a coworker cause I couldn't get it through his head Ford would play OLB.

Him: "BUT THE TV SAID DE!!!"

Me: "Yeah, he played DE in college, but he'll switch to OLB just like Tamba switched a few years ago"

Him: "BUT IT SAID DE!!!"

Me: :facepalm:

My brother texted me after the pick, questioning why we would take another DE in the 1st round. I simply replied with "shutup stupid".

Halfcan 05-12-2014 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10625732)
DeAnthony Thomas in the 4th was a reach?


Al....righty then.

I guess they missed seeing his highlight film-holy shit the kid has some moves.

-King- 05-12-2014 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10625736)
Let me guess, you said "He was a DE in a 4-3 defense" and they got all glossy-eyed...

His mind would probably melt if I tried to explain the differences between a 4-3 and 3-4 to him.

Chiefnj2 05-12-2014 01:54 PM

At the end of the day KC was in a position to try to fill starting holes in the roster. Instead they went with a bunch of specialists, some of which had a history of missing significant time due to injuries. That just brings back bad memories of Croyle, Moeki, Bell, Kelce and just about everyone other than Roaf.

Personally, I have no idea what direction the team is going in. I expect them to extend Smith soon, but I have no idea why if they aren't going to protect him or give him weapons.

htismaqe 05-12-2014 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 10625770)
Personally, I have no idea what direction the team is going in. I expect them to extend Smith soon, but I have no idea why if they aren't going to protect him or give him weapons.

I actually agree with this.

SAUTO 05-12-2014 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10625357)
What?

I mean, he could be right but there's absolutely NO WAY he has sources inside the Chiefs telling him they didn't like that pick.

my thoughts exactly...

Easy 6 05-12-2014 03:27 PM

Fox Sports gave us a B, atleast they're being fair.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/photos/...-051214#img_16

OnTheWarpath15 05-12-2014 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10625968)
Fox Sports gave us a B, atleast they're being fair.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/photos/...-051214#img_16

Who exactly isn't being "fair"?

When 4 of your 6 picks have significant injury histories and you didn't fill any needs - perceived or real - people aren't going to think much of your draft.

The medical risks alone justify "C" grades.

DeezNutz 05-12-2014 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10626007)
Who exactly isn't being "fair"?

When 4 of your 6 picks have significant injury histories and you didn't fill any needs - perceived or real - people aren't going to think much of your draft.

The medical risks alone justify "C" grades.

I find it very odd, though, that analysts consistently advocate "BPA, BPA" but then grade with a strong eye to need.

It's contradictory at best.

I really don't give a shit about "need" when it comes to the draft. FA is where a team should address needs.

Easy 6 05-12-2014 03:49 PM

I'll just go ahead and parrot Deez's post.

Most here seem to be pretty happy with this one OTWP, you're in the minority.

Carnivore 05-12-2014 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10622387)
Well, I can't give him a pass on Bowe either. 2.5 years of guaranteed base salary is highway robbery.


This!!!!

DeezNutz 05-12-2014 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10626021)
I'll just go ahead and parrot Deez's post.

Most here seem to be pretty happy with this one OTWP, you're in the minority.

I think it's possible for need and BPA to meet, though. Dennard, for example, would have been my choice in the first round because I think he was the BPA.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.