ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs The hold that took away our 2 point conversion (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=305245)

Dartgod 01-19-2017 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARROW2 (Post 12696842)
Ray Charles can see this BS being set up from the grave

RAY CHARLES IS DEAD?!?

Baby Lee 01-19-2017 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12696838)
If you check out NFL.com...there are like 8 pictures of Rodgers on the front page...including being positioned against Brady on the SB advert.

The were nice enough to have one small picture of Ryan....

Not bad for a fired Bills HC.

Rain Man 01-19-2017 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12696838)
If you check out NFL.com...there are like 8 pictures of Rodgers on the front page...including being positioned against Brady on the SB advert.

The were nice enough to have one small picture of Ryan....

At some point I'm going to do a study of the coverage and shows on NFL Network. I can understand spending more time covering the teams that have won more, so that wouldn't be my thesis question. My hypothesis is that they cover some teams disproportionately to their record.

For example, they had a nice series a while back that was their lists of the top ten Cowboy, top ten Raiders, etc. I thought it would be nice to see the top ten on each team in their opinion. But they only did it for a handful of teams and then stopped. Looking at the list, they covered the Cowboys, Raiders, Steelers, Packers, 49ers, and Giants. Oh, and Patriots. I missed that one in my scan.

They've done 129 episodes of "Top Ten", and in that time they've covered six teams. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_Top_10 Seriously? You've done a list of the top ten players named Steve and the top ten draft-day moments and the top ten things you loved about Tim Tebow, and you haven't thought to do the top ten players for 25 of the league's 32 teams? Really?

InChiefsHeaven 01-19-2017 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Northman (Post 12695747)
Crawl back into your Connor Cook hole.

FYP

TimBone 01-19-2017 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 12696881)
Not bad for a fired Bills HC.

Lmao

TimBone 01-19-2017 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 12696932)
At some point I'm going to do a study of the coverage and shows on NFL Network. I can understand spending more time covering the teams that have won more, so that wouldn't be my thesis question. My hypothesis is that they cover some teams disproportionately to their record.

For example, they had a nice series a while back that was their lists of the top ten Cowboy, top ten Raiders, etc. I thought it would be nice to see the top ten on each team in their opinion. But they only did it for a handful of teams and then stopped. Looking at the list, they covered the Cowboys, Raiders, Steelers, Packers, 49ers, and Giants. Oh, and Patriots. I missed that one in my scan.

They've done 129 episodes of "Top Ten", and in that time they've covered six teams. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_Top_10 Seriously? You've done a list of the top ten players named Steve and the top ten draft-day moments and the top ten things you loved about Tim Tebow, and you haven't thought to do the top ten players for 25 of the league's 32 teams? Really?

Not to mention, when they did the Top 10 TE's, they had Tony G listed somewhere around 6 or 7, I believe.

Rain Man 01-19-2017 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 12697079)
Not to mention, when they did the Top 10 TE's, they had Tony G listed somewhere around 6 or 7, I believe.

That better not be true.

KC Dan 01-19-2017 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 12697079)
Not to mention, when they did the Top 10 TE's, they had Tony G listed somewhere around 6 or 7, I believe.

Nah, Tony G was #2, John Mackie was #1

TimBone 01-19-2017 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Dan (Post 12697174)
Nah, Tony G was #2, John Mackie was #1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 12697167)
That better not be true.

Yeah....once again, I'm full of shit. My bad. I'm really on a roll today.

KC Dan 01-19-2017 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 12697181)
Yeah....once again, I'm full of shit. My bad. I'm really on a roll today.

My prescription: Start drinking heavily. It will cure what ails you...

SAUTO 01-19-2017 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARROW2 (Post 12696823)
heard the interview on either 610 AM or 810 AM

I can't find that quote anywhere, prove it

BlackOp 01-20-2017 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 12694867)
It's like the conspiracy nuts don't even consider the feasibility of it at all.

The one critical flaw in your line of thought...is you project your own morality on a group of tight-knit billionaire businessmen. They painstakingly vet potential owners...why? They dont want someone rocking the cash-cow. You are actually arrogant/narcissistic enough to believe they think like you...they dont...at all. You are the demographic they target...they profit of your naivety/trust.

Owners are merely one of 32 tentacle arms..that connect to a mother-hub profit center. The ones that appear to care...is simply because it's their hobby and offers a bit of limelight. Hunt wasn't heart-broken over making a quarter of a billion dollars this year.

NFL has eroded into fodder for the plebeians...just like in ancient Rome. It gave the disgruntled an avenue/outlet for their hostility.... redirected from being exploited by their government. It's the modern-day coliseum...a satiation/diversion for the masses.

crazycoffey 01-20-2017 05:38 AM

It was a BS call. I remembered a non call hold on ford, iirc, when bell was sweeping to him just a bit earlier in the game. They call that hold, I'm ok with calling the EF hold. If one is, they both are.

GloryDayz 01-20-2017 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12697953)
The one critical flaw in your line of thought...is you project your own morality on a group of tight-knit billionaire businessmen. They painstakingly vet potential owners...why? They dont want someone rocking the cash-cow. You are actually arrogant/narcissistic enough to believe they think like you...they dont...at all. You are the demographic they target...they profit of your naivety/trust.

Owners are merely one of 32 tentacle arms..that connect to a mother-hub profit center. The ones that appear to care...is simply because it's their hobby and offers a bit of limelight. Hunt wasn't heart-broken over making a quarter of a billion dollars this year.

NFL has eroded into fodder for the plebeians...just like in ancient Rome. It gave the disgruntled an avenue/outlet for their hostility.... redirected from being exploited by their government. It's the modern-day coliseum...a satiation/diversion for the masses.

Wow, well said.

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk (so spelling be damned!!!)

GloryDayz 01-20-2017 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazycoffey (Post 12698006)
It was a BS call. I remembered a non call hold on ford, iirc, when bell was sweeping to him just a bit earlier in the game. They call that hold, I'm ok with calling the EF hold. If one is, they both are.

The refs are only human, they can't see everything. Sometimes they "let them play." Bla bla bla...

Edit: Perhaps Harrison "got the call" because he lobbied it? We may never know why, the NFL would never be forthcoming about hoe they choose their selectivity. However, if our D is the least bit pissed about it, starting week-1 of next year every hold they think was missed should result in a Brady-like rant to the official. Do it 15-20 per game, make a scene that the tv cameras won't miss, and they might drive a conversation the 32 tentacles weren't counting on. Perhaps they can end each rant with holding up their fingers in Fisher's jersey number, just so they get the point. And you can't do it just once, you have to so it enough to drive-home the point and drive the conversation. And if they start ****ing the team for it, we'll, that's the same as it ever was, now there's just a new reason.

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk (so spelling be damned!!!)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.