ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft *****OFFICIAL 2010 NFL Draft Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=226929)

EyePod 04-23-2010 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6706203)
This team is going to be 32nd in the league in rush defense after this, color me unimpressed.

While he's not the answer, shaun smith is an improvement over our NT situation last year.

DBOSHO 04-23-2010 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6706443)
Ah yes, well I'm sure that'll help when we get no pass rush.

are you done yet?

milkman 04-23-2010 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OleMissCUb (Post 6706459)
ya I'm a homer, but the dude is the only player in SEC History with 1,000+ yards rushing and 500+ yards receiving in the same season. He might not be the guy you wanted there, but there is no way a guy who makes SEC defenses look stupid week in and week out is a "shitty" player.

McCluster isn't a bad player, he is simply a bad pick for the Chiefs.

WildTurkey 04-23-2010 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6706465)
You like McCluster but not Williams.....so polished WR's are bad, midgets with no true positions are good?

McCluster can take it to the house everytime he touches the ball.... Williams not so much, and evidently his own college coach didnt want him either choosing Tate over him

CosmicPal 04-23-2010 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6706437)
How hard is it to understand the spot the Chiefs and Eagles are in is so completely different.

The Eagles can take a luxury weapon, our team needs a foundation.

How hard is it for you to understand that when a team has a player on their draftboard and the likelihood of him NOT making it to your next pick too hard for you to understand.

This doesn't have anything to do with who the Eagles have on their team...it has everything to do with the fact the Chiefs and Eagles both coveted the guy and the Chiefs knew he wouldn't be there for their next pick.

Teams do this shit all the time. The Chiefs are not alone in this.

KcMizzou 04-23-2010 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6706460)
This whole day is numbing me to football.

C'mon, you're not Sam Hall.

Buck up, lil' fella.

BigChiefFan 04-23-2010 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6706443)
Ah yes, well I'm sure that'll help when we get no pass rush.

Every qualified GM knows you take the nickle CB for the foundation of 3-4, especially when you we're practically dead last in stopping the run. Never fear, we have nickle CB, that we traded a HOF TE for. That should turn this putrid defense around in no time. Mighty Mouse to the rescue. WTF is our team thinking?

SenselessChiefsFan 04-23-2010 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6706458)
Have you seen the middle of this defense?

I wish the Chiefs would have gotten an OLB or an ILB. But, linebacker is the thinnest position in the draft, so they weren't getting value at the position.

As it is, the defensive line is set. The secondary is set. The ILB's will be better because DJ will actually see the field.

I would really like to see a player at OLB or ILB, but we will see.

Mecca 04-23-2010 07:26 PM

Great I hope they enjoy McCluster, that's still a horrendous pick in this draft for this team.

ChiefaRoo 04-23-2010 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6706458)
Have you seen the middle of this defense?


Yes, it was bad. Some of that is scheme though. All I'm saying is Crennel made his mark as a D coach and KC's young players up front should improve. If they don't taking NT/ILB in the 2nd wouldn't matter this year anyway.

KC desperately needs more ILB/OLB physicality against the run though. Maybe they can find a two down ILB in the 4th or 5th. I'd like to see a TE in the 4th.

WildTurkey 04-23-2010 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6706474)
McCluster isn't a bad player, he is simply a bad pick for the Chiefs.

we needed playmakers, and that's what he is, if he was the top player on the board when they picked than I don't have a problem with it...

Mecca 04-23-2010 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 6706480)
Every qualified GM knows you take the nickle CB for the foundation of 3-4, especially when you we're practically dead last in stopping the run. Never fear, we have nickle CB, that we traded a HOF TE for. That should turn this putrid defense around in no time. Mighty Mouse to the rescue. WTF is our team thinking?

Don't worry, they gave Mike Vrabel a new supply of roids so he can get 10 sacks again.

SenselessChiefsFan 04-23-2010 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 6706480)
Every qualified GM knows you take the nickle CB for the foundation of 3-4, especially when you we're practically dead last in stopping the run. Never fear, we have nickle CB, that we traded a HOF TE for. That should turn this putrid defense around in no time. Mighty Mouse to the rescue. WTF is our team thinking?

Thinking D. Hester type of return ability that will flip the field and change games.

See, here is the the thing about having a good returner.... if you get 20 extra yards on a return, then when you punt, you can pin them back 20 yards further. Especially given that we have Colquit. He doesn't have a cannon for a leg, but he definitely has the touch.

Marcellus 04-23-2010 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6706474)
McCluster isn't a bad player, he is simply a bad pick for the Chiefs.

We don't need any play makers on offense?

RedThat 04-23-2010 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6706474)
McCluster isn't a bad player, he is simply a bad pick for the Chiefs.

I disagree.

If a guy could give you a good return game and decent production out of the slot, plus, add a little to your running game, I think this pick is a win.

He makes the chiefs better in a lot of ways.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.