I have pointed out you are misleading people on this many times, why do you ignore it? This has nothing to do with your BS pipe bomb story. It has everything to do with you supporting expelling students for defending themself. Keep ranting about irrelevant BS though. You lose more credibility with every post if that's even possible at this point.

You conveniently missed the liberal SF Chronical using the same stats. You also fail to acknowlege the Department of Justice. You only have one one persons opinion your running your program off of and that makes everything else BS? Is it even possible for you to be anymore bias?

I am done with the gun thing with you at this point it is a waste of my time. Unless you want to discuss your endorsement of run and snitch policy when a student is assaulted without bringing up that ridiculous pipe bomb story again or want to address your hypocrytical stance on not wanting the church to promote their moral agenda in schools but you see no problem having them pushing yours I think we are done.

I'm sorry, I see a big difference between acceptance of people (acknowledging that there are difference and being ok with that) and instilling that in children (which will go a long way towards avoiding ignorant hate crimes), and the teachings of myopic zealots who claim to be advocating the 'love' of the good book, but in reality are spreading hate.

You know this as well as I do..

You say "Run and Snitch" because you want to place the policy in the pejorative, derailing it before a debate can ever take place. How is this different from someone in the 60's saying that the Civil Rights Act is the N*gger love act?? The answer is that there is no difference.

Here is a question for you: Your kid is punched by someone at school. In the past he could defend himself, and if he did, he'd probably serve some ISS (as was the case in my school). On the contrary, your kid is punched, and his assailant is gone for the year. Don't you think that this policy would go a long way towards abating school violence. If kids know they are going to essentially flunk if they start a fight, you can damn sure know that they aren't going to be starting shit. Don't be naive. Furthermore, how often are kids unsupervised at school? I find it hard to believe that there isn't an authority figure within a few seconds, but maybe I am just being naive. Furthermore, if it worries you that much, teach your kid effective methods on how to block punches. Then if someone tries to punch him, he can still defend himself without harming the other person. Conflict avoided. But I'm sure that this never crossed your mind, since you automatically assume that violence is the only resolution to any conflict.

Just because the SF Chronicle used the stats, that doesn't mean they are correct. How do I know the reporter wasn't just being lazy and went to the first stats he could find? Maybe his editor is a gun nut. Am I suddenly the harbinger for all liberal outlets of media?? Some of them are woefully wrong. Quite often, liberal media outlets make stupid decisions--The CBS Memo is probably a prime example of that very case. Am I saying that all those who espouse the liberal perspective are inherently inerrant?? No, but that is how you wish to categorize me so that your vantage point seems more reasonable. You are attempting to take the reporting of one paper (the Chronicle) to undermine the efforts of a thoroughly researched, and peer-edited study that clearly refutes and negates the major crutch of your argument. It doesn't work that way. You deride Michael Moore for playing fast and loose with facts--where is your sense of outrage at Kleck's preposterous assertions??

Quit acting like a kneejerk talking head, it doesn't suit you. Hell, it doesn't even suit a pit bull.

Why? Are you foretelling what they will bring us in the future?

[/sarcasm]

meter functioning?? Maybe you should kick that around with your "futbol"

I'll bite, what's [sarcastic] about inquiring whether you are "one that indicates or foreshadows what is to come" from the liberal media, when it looks like you MEANT to ask if your were supposed to be their 'standard bearer,' or 'spokesman?'
Or does the composition professor not know what 'harbinger' means? :shrug:

Since I seem to be indicative of everyone's hatred of the ivory tower, and most liberal movements stem from academia, why don't you tell me? Perhaps you could get your shriveled dick out of your Piven blow up doll long enough to type a response, no??

Although we are all quite aware that Mr. Law & Order knows what a complete sentence.

Care to revisit that one in between your viewings of everything trendy on television, lambs??

Did you mean 'the epitome of?'

ROFL ROFL

Jesus Christ Jenkins why don't you quit while you still have enough strength to tap out?

This thread is covered in the blood that flies from your face every time one of these guys absolutely bitch slaps you.

You'll live to fight another day.

For someone who has such endless hatred of me, you seem to spend quite a bit of time on here trying to 'educate me', going as far as dictionary.com to try and back yourself up. Is your life *that* devoid of meaning?? Aren't you supposed to be at work right now?? At least I have an excuse. I'm off for the summer and it is raining outside, but you, who has 'no desire to converse with me' continually interjects your opinions on everything that I have to say. Why don't you just electronically hate fuck me and get it over with, or sit down, STFU and continue the blessed tour through mediocrity that your life has no doubt been so far.

Here's one for you, ass

Serving to indicate: symptoms indicative of anemia; an insignia indicative of high rank.
Grammar. Of, relating to, or being the mood of the verb used in ordinary objective statements.

Durr gee, what might that be pertaining to?

You're no liberal....that's theft. Most prof's are Marxists not true liberals in the classical liberal tradition. They are an insult to America's heritage of liberty.

Pick apart 453 all you want. I'm waiting.

http://www.laughmachine.com/images/B...en_colbert.jpg
I accept your apology.

ROFL ROFL

Of course you would split hairs to this degree to try and undermine my stance rather than analyzing what I'm actually saying.

Liberal--------------------------------------Conservative/Authoritarian

Where might an anarcho-socialist go there???