Originally Posted by FAX (Post 7005659)

Nobody pisses off a draftabulator like Mr. Hootie. Nobody.

FAX

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7005521)

lmao

ok guys

this is great

I've hurt your feelings so much we start making shit up...

classic

no big deal

I've gotten my vindication.

always have been right about peyton
was always right about romo
right about rodgers
right about palmer

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 7005701)

Hamas just dominated this thread. holy shit!

i agree with ROR... rename this thread to Hottie gets pwned.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7005731)

What's even more ridiculous is that Hootie is claiming some sort of victory because the Chiefs won.

His reasoning all along had been that Vegas thought the game would be close, which made Hootie believe the Chiefs would be capable of winning.

If had said something to the effect of "The Chiefs will win because one of the rookie returners will score a TD, the defense will setup the offense for short fields all night and despite the fact that Matt Cassel will throw for less than 75 yards with a completion percentage lower than 50, the Chiefs will win", then he'd have reason to boast.

No such prediction was made.

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 7005746)

What's up with DL's quote in your sig? You know it's only 1 week, but I say it's a 50/50 shot of that happening now. Cleveland and San Fran both looked pretty bad.

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 7005650)

This is like watching the Broncos vs the Raiders. You really can't stand either one and just hope for a bunch of broken bones and a tie game.

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 7005529)

It's nonsensical, but you can't understand this because you are 1) hopped up 2) stupid 3) delusional and 4) sociopathic.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7005811)

What's up? What do you mean?

Dave went on record stating the Chiefs would be 3-0. He brought out various stats to prove it. I thought it was a ballsy prediction and put it on my sig line.

Very few people have balls around here.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7005811)

What's up? What do you mean?

Dave went on record stating the Chiefs would be 3-0. He brought out various stats to prove it. I thought it was a ballsy prediction and put it on my sig line.

Very few people have balls around here.

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7005640)

To Hootie's credit, he seems to be pretty good about re-evaluating a situation objectively even if it doesn't dovetail with his preconceived notion. Take the McCluster pick. He wanted someone else and was initially pissed. After checking out McCluster, he came to the conclusion that it was a pretty good pick.

To those who practice an absolute scorched earch approach to anyone and everything that does not mirror their own ideas, it may seem like waffling. The truth is that Hootie was on-board with the pick long before training camp ever started. He isn't openly rooting for Clausen to make Pioli look like a fool for passing on him just out of spite.

There are pricks on here who are absolutely insufferable towards those with opposing opinions (God forbid someone should disagree with drafting Ghoulstin or Clausen number one overall.) It makes for a good time rubbing their faces in it. If I thought it would be any different next year, that would be one thing. It won't, though. It will be more of the same. The more they are proven wrong, the stronger their need to double down next time.