ChiefsPlanet
Page 31 of 40 « First 2127282930 31 32333435 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Palko told he is starting in Chicago. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=253125)

ToxSocks 12-01-2011 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8158539)
The experts have been absolutely snowed when it came to the 2010 and 2011 draft. I can't wait for another year of mock drafts projecting us to take an offensive tackle and specifically Riley Reiff given the Pioli-Ferentz connection.

If Pioli doesn't draft Luck or RG3, he may as well tender his resignation for all I care.
Pretty much this. No one has been able to anticipate the Chiefs drafts in the Pioli era. Good or bad.

SPATCH 12-01-2011 12:32 PM
Could you imagine the weeping and gnashing of teeth if we go through this third trimester abortion of a season only to draft Riley Reiff?

Hydrae 12-01-2011 12:33 PM
Orton will be the starter and soon. There is no other reason for us to have signed him.

HemiEd 12-01-2011 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8158263)
Freeman did not meet hardly any of the Parcells quarterback pillars.

He came out as a junior.
He did not win 23 games.
As far as I can find, he did not graduate.
He really wasn't even a full three-year starter as he took over the starting role in the sixth week in 2006.

Maybe Parcell's method is antiquated, but it was probably a portion of the criteria Pioli used to assess QBs.
How does Cassel measure up to that standard?

jd1020 12-01-2011 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_spatula (Post 8158615)
Could you imagine the weeping and gnashing of teeth if we go through this third trimester abortion of a season only to draft Riley Reiff?
Depending on where the Chiefs end up drafting, I wouldn't hate a Martin/Reiff pick.

If the Chiefs miss out on Barkley and RG3 because Miami and ?? are ahead of the Chiefs what positions are we looking at that would be a value pick in the top 10? QB, OL, LB and WR?

QB's you're looking at Jones and Tannehill. I wouldn't hate either but Jones has dropped off my watch list. I still don't get where this whole "Jones is Cassel 2.0" shit comes from though. Tannehill can be had later, maybe try and trade down with the Broncos/Browns.

OL you're looking at Martin and Reiff. Either would be good value, imo.

LB you're looking at reaching.

WR we are set. Unless Pioli wants to Franchise-trade Bowe for a first, which I wouldn't hate.

You could also look at RB but I'm really not a fan of drafting high on RB's. How many times does some third day/UDFA have to come in and tear shit up. OL has more to do with RB's, imo.

Fish 12-01-2011 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 8158629)
How does Cassel measure up to that standard?
Ouch.....

htismaqe 12-01-2011 01:13 PM
I like Reilly Reiff but I don't see him as a big-time NFL prospect. He's probably slightly below Bulaga, which means he'll probably go right in between where we pick in the 1st and where we pick in the 2nd.

Rausch 12-01-2011 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8158235)
I think Lilja is done. His body is breaking down.
He was never really all that good...

Chiefs Pantalones 12-01-2011 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hydrae (Post 8158618)
Orton will be the starter and soon. There is no other reason for us to have signed him.
I agree. I'm thinking they release Cassel and start Orton next year. It's just the f'ed up thing the Chiefs do.

Rasputin 12-01-2011 01:24 PM
Drunk John Daly > Todd Haley

BossChief 12-01-2011 02:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8158718)
I like Reilly Reiff but I don't see him as a big-time NFL prospect. He's probably slightly below Bulaga, which means he'll probably go right in between where we pick in the 1st and where we pick in the 2nd.
That's how I see him as well.

If he falls to the mid 20s or so (which he wont due to the need for the position as opposed to the amount of legit prospects out there to fill the need) I would be on board to trade up for him from our 2.

Hammock Parties 12-01-2011 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8158718)
he'll probably go right in between where we pick in the 1st and where we pick in the 2nd.
Sounds like a Pioli pick to me.

tredadda 12-01-2011 05:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCharles1981 (Post 8157626)
This might be Todd Haley's way of saying to Palko "Enjoy the rest of the season because once it's over, so are you." If he knew what was good for him, Haley will cut him before next season, draft a rookie QB, and have him battle it out against Orton for the starting position next year. Frankly, Matt Cassell has proven himself unworthy of being the next great Chiefs QB.
LMAO "Matt Cassell has proven himself unworthy of being the next great Chiefs QB". Name me three great Chiefs QB's. I can think of Dawson and possibly Green even though calling him great might be a stretch. Montana was a rental and does not qualify as a "great Chiefs QB."

BoneKrusher 12-01-2011 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8159479)
LMAO "Matt Cassell has proven himself unworthy of being the next great Chiefs QB". Name me three great Chiefs QB's. I can think of Dawson and possibly Green even though calling him great might be a stretch. Montana was a rental and does not qualify as a "great Chiefs QB."
yep, other than the three you named the Chiefs have gone with camp fodder for qbs.

FAX 12-01-2011 05:27 PM
Hmmm ... next great Chiefs QB ... ... hmmmmm.

Steven Leroy DeBerg was great at one time.

Well, he was next at one time, anyway.

FAX


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 AM.
Page 31 of 40 « First 2127282930 31 32333435 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.