ThaVirus |
12-28-2016 10:52 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmdrzman
(Post 12646695)
If we had a QB like Brees or hell even Derek Carr we'd be sitting at probably 13-2
|
You can't be serious.
If we had Derek Carr we would literally be undefeated and I would comfortably bet my next 5 paychecks that we would smoke anyone in the Super Bowl.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dls6501
(Post 12646588)
I dont care if we are talking about football or whatever the topic may be. If someone/something/some team is ranked 22nd out of 32 in something, they are NOT elite. Period. End of argument.
The Chiefs are currently ranked 22nd in time of possession in the NFL. TWENTY SECOND. That is absolutely NOT elite.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dls6501
(Post 12646626)
Dude are you ****ing kidding me? Someone made a claim that we are an ELITE BALL CONTROL TEAM. All I said was when a team is ranked 22nd out of 32 in time of possession, that team is NOT elite at it.
That's all. Period. The only one who is a moron is you...for continuing to misunderstand the conversation that you were not even a part of.
And as far as your first line of this reeruned post, NO ONE said that TOP was a good indicator of team success. No one. But of course, you werent understanding what you were reading...again.
|
Peej has mentioned it several times so I'm fairly certain he's actually referring to turnover differential- not TOP.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut
(Post 12646598)
Literally, the guy shows up in 2013 and turns a 2-14 team around. With basically the same roster from the year prior. Jamaal Charles's production skyrocketed with Smith at the helm. You don't get a 5 year starting QB with an excellent winning record because he's being carried by his team. The idiots who glorify fantasy football have poor understanding of the sport.
|
In some ways, yes, and in other ways his production declined. Jamaal has already established himself as an elite back prior to Alex being a Chief.
.. and realistically, the increase in TD production and receiving yards had more to do with Reid and his philosophy than Smith.
|