Mephistopheles Janx |
05-26-2023 06:20 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
(Post 16960744)
First, name all the FAs the Chiefs have signed the last few seasons at a clear discount to the market because we’re a winning organization. I’m very excited to see your list.
|
Right off the bat... Ju-Ju at $3.76m (which went up to $9m on incentive bonuses) vs MVS at 3/30.
Quote:
Second, we signed MVS in the third wave of FA because we had traded Hill and needed to re-tool the WR room. We didn’t have a surplus of options.
|
I understand why we got him and why we had to pay him. I'm just not happy about it.
Quote:
Third, you’re not even looking at contracts in a remotely sensible or comparable way. Both MVS and Gage signed for 3/30mm. MVS got 8.5mm at signing and then 6.5mm if on the roster for 2023. Total 15mm at 7.5mm/yr for 2yrs or 8.5mm/1yr. Gage got 15mm at signing and then 5mm if on the roster for 2023. Total 20mm at 10mm/yr for 2yrs or 15mm/1yr.
If a 1yr deal, 8.5 < 15.
If a 2yr deal, 7.5 < 10.
Happy to see the value we got with MVS?
|
No, I'm not really happy with the "value" for MVS. I complained about no other regular as much as I did about MVS all season long. I sincerely hope that D-Hop wants to ring chase, Rice balls out, and we have someone come calling for MVS.
I guess it was an exaggeration to say he is overpaid when compared to others. Every dude in the NFL is there because they can play the game. Him going off in the AFCCG was phenomenal and I'm grateful. Do I trust him as an effective receiver all season long? No. MVS is Demarcus Robinson with a lower catch % and WAY more expensive.
The Patriots have JuJu as their #2/slot guy for less than we have MVS as a 4th option.
|