ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****The Skyy Moore Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=343627)

Imon Yourside 12-22-2022 11:17 PM

<iframe width="640" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/NkV0O1uWkXg" title="Tag, you're it!" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Hammock Parties 12-23-2022 12:13 AM

trey with quick feet

ThyKingdomCome15 12-23-2022 04:13 AM

Patrick would rather throw it to anyone but Skyy. That's telling.

Imon Yourside 12-23-2022 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15 (Post 16683834)
Patrick would rather throw it to anyone but Skyy. That's telling.

He's a rookie, give it time.

ChiefRocka 12-23-2022 06:56 AM

Skyy is going full Keysor Soze in the playoffs. Gimp to Mvp receiving 50 yard bombs from Mahomey

KC_Lee 12-23-2022 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRocka (Post 16683852)
Skyy is going full Keysor Soze in the playoffs. Gimp to Mvp receiving 50 yard bombs from Mahomey

The Spirt of Buddy Biancalana LIVES!!!!

JPH83 12-23-2022 12:16 PM

I think I've been as big of a defender of Moore as anyone. I liked the pick and I think he can be a good WR for us. Not elite but better than solid.

That said, his usage has been pretty disappointing. Maybe he offers too similar a role to JJSS, who in turn offers a little of what Kelce does. But given how much some of these guys have struggled against man, and that his calling card is winning quickly, it just seems a waste.

I get the argument that maybe he's just not doing enough to convince coaches or Mahomes, and that guys like MVS occupy a different role. But it's a bummer seeing him given less looks than some of the others. It's a waste imo.

OnTheWarpath15 12-23-2022 12:29 PM

This thread has been an epic re-read.

Comparisons to Antonio Brown and expecting 700-800 yards this year.

Whoo boy.

DJ's left nut 12-23-2022 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16684385)
This thread has been an epic re-read.

Comparisons to Antonio Brown and expecting 700-800 yards this year.

Whoo boy.

Hater

ToxSocks 12-23-2022 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPH83 (Post 16684357)
I think I've been as big of a defender of Moore as anyone. I liked the pick and I think he can be a good WR for us. Not elite but better than solid.

That said, his usage has been pretty disappointing. Maybe he offers too similar a role to JJSS, who in turn offers a little of what Kelce does. But given how much some of these guys have struggled against man, and that his calling card is winning quickly, it just seems a waste.

I get the argument that maybe he's just not doing enough to convince coaches or Mahomes, and that guys like MVS occupy a different role. But it's a bummer seeing him given less looks than some of the others. It's a waste imo.

Meh.

All it takes is 1 heroic catch in the playoffs and everyone will be in full force claiming it was a successful season for him. Skyy got 5 catches for 63 yards against the Chargers and it gets treated like a break out game.

And i think you're right about the JuJu thing. I've been thinking that for awhile now.

Yeah, i get that JuJu and Skyy are totally different in terms of size. But maybe Skyy's role will be similar to JuJu.

I think Skyy's best case scenario going into next season is that the Chiefs see him as this short yardage, reliable target guy who can fill JuJu's shoes in getting open 5-10 yards at a time underneath. Enough so that they allow JuJu to walk.

The optimist in me says that very well could be the case.

Chiefspants 12-23-2022 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPH83 (Post 16684357)
I think I've been as big of a defender of Moore as anyone. I liked the pick and I think he can be a good WR for us. Not elite but better than solid.

That said, his usage has been pretty disappointing. Maybe he offers too similar a role to JJSS, who in turn offers a little of what Kelce does. But given how much some of these guys have struggled against man, and that his calling card is winning quickly, it just seems a waste.

I get the argument that maybe he's just not doing enough to convince coaches or Mahomes, and that guys like MVS occupy a different role. But it's a bummer seeing him given less looks than some of the others. It's a waste imo.

I think the thing with Skyy is that with his skillset, he simply can not afford to run routes incorrectly. Even him drifting 2 yards away from his target can not happen. He just doesn't have the athleticism to make up for being imprecise on the field. Welker, who flat out set the standard of a slot receiver, had a 75% catch percentage in his prime (insane, tbh). But that was because Brady (and even CASSEL) could count on him to be where he needed to be with near 100% precision.

Andy has not hid the fact that two of Mahomes interceptions were on Skyy in postgame this year. That's telling from Andy, who usually opts for things like "we gotta play better." Eventually Mahomes is just not going to look in his direction if he can't rely on Skyy to be where he needs to be.

Megatron96 12-23-2022 01:04 PM

Lol, on most passing plays Sky is usually the 3rd or 4th read at best.

Now think about our OT play this season. Just how often do you people think Patrick getting to the 3rd-4th read on most passing plays?

OKchiefs 12-23-2022 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 16684416)
I think the thing with Skyy is that with his skillset, he simply can not afford to run routes incorrectly. Even him drifting 2 yards away from his target can not happen. He just doesn't have the athleticism to make up for being imprecise on the field. Welker, who flat out set the standard of a slot receiver, had a 75% catch percentage in his prime (insane, tbh). But that was because Brady (and even CASSEL) could count on him to be where he needed to be with near 100% precision.

Andy has not hid the fact that two of Mahomes interceptions were on Skyy in postgame this year. That's telling from Andy, who usually opts for things like "we gotta play better." Eventually Mahomes is just not going to look in his direction if he can't rely on Skyy to be where he needs to be.

Begs the question as to why the **** did KC take an undersized WR with limited athleticism in the 2nd round

Megatron96 12-23-2022 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs (Post 16684479)
Begs the question as to why the **** did KC take an undersized WR with limited athleticism in the 2nd round

ROFL
Limited athleticism, oh god.

DJ's left nut 12-23-2022 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16684485)
ROFL
Limited athleticism, oh god.

Does your objection come from one of those excellent 3-cone times that don't exist that y'all keep saying do?

Or is it some outstanding shuttle time?

At some point you fellas convinced yourselves that he's some elite athletic specimen. He isn't. Never has been. As an NFL wide receiver, he's an average athlete...mostly. In some ways he's above average, in some very much below. On balance he's...fine. And small. But he does have good hands and some solid abilities that should make him a decent complementary player someday.

But he's no sort of elite athlete out there, no matter how many times you guys have tried to simply create facts from whole cloth.

KC Hawks 12-23-2022 01:30 PM

I think he could still get 700-800 yards this season!!!

Megatron96 12-23-2022 01:31 PM

Where did I say he had elite athleticism? Don’t recall going there. I said he could run some sweet routes. He’s got some wiggle. He obviously can run, 4.45 sec/ 40 time, iirc. He can jump, don’t remember what he did in the combine, but we’ve seen him get up in games.

Don’t remember his shuttle/cone time anymore, didn’t realize that we must concede he’s not a good athlete based on some drill he ran in the combine. I always figured the truth about a player came out on the field, not in the combine. My bad.

DJ's left nut 12-23-2022 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16684520)
Where did I say he had elite athleticism? Don’t recall going there. I said he could run some sweet routes. He’s got some wiggle. He obviously can run, 4.45 sec/ 40 time, iirc. He can jump, don’t remember what he did in the combine, but we’ve seen him get up in games.

Don’t remember his shuttle/cone time anymore, didn’t realize that we must concede he’s not a good athlete based on some drill he ran in the combine. I always figured the truth about a player came out on the field, not in the combine. My bad.

Y'all are making a single catch against the Chargers do a LOT of work, then...

Megatron96 12-23-2022 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16684535)
Y'all are making a single catch against the Chargers do a LOT of work, then...

Who is “y’all”?

And not sure which LAC game you’re referring to but whatever.

O.city 12-23-2022 01:47 PM

I’d hope he has more of a role going into next year

Guess we shall see

ToxSocks 12-23-2022 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16684556)
I’d hope he has more of a role going into next year

Guess we shall see

I think we all hope that.

But with MVS here and not going anywhere....and Toney....and if you listen to CP, JuJu will be back.

And with the Chiefs likely to pick up another WR from SOMEWHERE, it's not some sure thing that there's a clear path to snaps next season either.

To use Pacheco's words, he's gonna have to take a grown man's job.

So who's that grown man gonna be?

Because if he doesn't, it's gonna be the same excuses as this year. "Well, he's the 5th read, what do you expect?"

Well....i guess i expect him to be all the things everyone told me he'd be? Because if he were, he wouldn't be the 5th read.

So next season, he needs to take a grown man's job. So again, who's that grown man gonna be?

O.city 12-23-2022 01:56 PM

I don’t see bringing jjss back. If that’s the role you want moore to fill atleast

If they do I’d say that says a lot about what they think about moore

ToxSocks 12-23-2022 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16684578)
I don’t see bringing jjss back. If that’s the role you want moore to fill atleast

Agreed.

-King- 12-23-2022 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16684578)
I don’t see bringing jjss back. If that’s the role you want moore to fill atleast

If they do I’d say that says a lot about what they think about moore

If JJSS comes back I think it will be because he loves the system and is willing to take a discount to stay in it. I don't see us being able or should offer him what some other teams will after this season.

So either it will say they don't believe Moore can step up in that role or they'll be able to get Juju back at a price they can't turn down.

ToxSocks 12-23-2022 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16684620)
If JJSS comes back I think it will be because he loves the system and is willing to take a discount to stay in it. I don't see us being able or should offer him what some other teams will after this season.

So either it will say they don't believe Moore can step up in that role or they'll be able to get Juju back at a price they can't turn down.

I don't believe for a second teams will be clamoring to pay this guy. Nope. If the Chiefs want him back, he'll be back. And he'll still be cheap.

What exactly has he done to show GM's he's anything other than what he's always been? It's been two straight season's with no team offering him big money. I don't see that changing.

DJ's left nut 12-23-2022 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16684636)
I don't believe for a second teams will be clamoring to pay this guy. Nope. If the Chiefs want him back, he'll be back. And he'll still be cheap.

What exactly has he done to show GM's he's anything other than what he's always been? It's been two straight season's with no team offering him big money. I don't see that changing.

If you wanted to run KCs offense you could probably sign JJSS to do a reasonable facsimile of Travis Kelce...

O.city 12-23-2022 02:28 PM

That’s true. I’m not against it, I like jjss a lot

But they can’t keep burning high round picks on guys that take a while to contribute like that

Easy 6 12-23-2022 02:37 PM

I can't really buy into all the pessimism yet, limited snaps for rookie receivers is longstanding SOP for Andy Reid

To quote Aaron Rodgers... R-E-L-A-X

Megatron96 12-23-2022 02:41 PM

I mean, what’s the definition of limited? Are we comparing him to randy moss? Or DRob? Or Edelman? I’d say he’s not Randy, or Metcalf, but he’s probably more athletic than Edelman. Certainly faster. I doubt Edelman ever jumped higher or had quicker feet.

Let’s have some kind of reference here at least. And a 5’10” too short to play WR in the NFL? Lot of former WRs would probably disagree.

BossChief 12-23-2022 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16684385)
This thread has been an epic re-read.

Comparisons to Antonio Brown and expecting 700-800 yards this year.

Whoo boy.

Antonio Brown had 16 catches for 167 yards snd no TDs as a rookie.

Skyy has 18 for 212.

Suck it, hater.

(Meant as a joke. Skyy hasn’t earned the trust in Mahomes or the coaches as quickly as I anticipated he would)

O.city 12-23-2022 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 16684698)
I can't really buy into all the pessimism yet, limited snaps for rookie receivers is longstanding SOP for Andy Reid

To quote Aaron Rodgers... R-E-L-A-X

Here’s my issue with this.

Sure it’s a tough position to learn in this offense. But guys have come in early and done well.

Hardman put up numbers as a rookie. Maclin, jackson etc.

Skyy was a second round pick. If he needed that much time and development, maybe he was drafted too early?

BossChief 12-23-2022 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16684714)
I mean, what’s the definition of limited? Are we comparing him to randy moss? Or DRob? Or Edelman? I’d say he’s not Randy, or Metcalf, but he’s probably more athletic than Edelman. Certainly faster. I doubt Edelman ever jumped higher or had quicker feet.

Let’s have some kind of reference here at least. And a 5’10” too short to play WR in the NFL? Lot of former WRs would probably disagree.

Edelman/Welker is still the target.

BossChief 12-23-2022 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16684733)
Here’s my issue with this.

Sure it’s a tough position to learn in this offense. But guys have come in early and done well.

Hardman put up numbers as a rookie. Maclin, jackson etc.

Skyy was a second round pick. If he needed that much time and development, maybe he was drafted too early?

Impossible to judge if he was taken too early or not this early in his career.

I guess a fair way to judge that would be to go back through all 2nd round picks at WR over the last 10 years snd see how many were productive as rookies.

If I get bored, I just might do that.

ptlyon 12-23-2022 03:00 PM

I'd never be that bored

-King- 12-23-2022 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16684714)
I mean, what’s the definition of limited? Are we comparing him to randy moss? Or DRob? Or Edelman? I’d say he’s not Randy, or Metcalf, but he’s probably more athletic than Edelman. Certainly faster. I doubt Edelman ever jumped higher or had quicker feet.

Let’s have some kind of reference here at least. And a 5’10” too short to play WR in the NFL? Lot of former WRs would probably disagree.

Edelman proday numbers:
40 Yard Dash: 4.52 seconds
40 Yard (MPH): 18.1 (MPH)
20 Yard Split: 2.58 seconds
10 Yard Split: 1.52 seconds
Bench Press: (N/A) reps (225 lb)
Vertical Leap: 36.5 inches
Height: 70.38 inches
Weight: 195 lbs
Broad Jump: 123 inches
Hand Size: (N/A) inches
Arm Length: (N/A) inches
20 Yd Shuttle: 3.92 seconds
Three Cone: 6.62 seconds


Skyy Moore combine numbers

40 Yard Dash: 4.41 seconds
40 Yard (MPH): 18.55 (MPH)
20 Yard Split: 2.51 seconds
10 Yard Split: 1.46 seconds
Bench Press: (N/A) reps (225 lb)
Wonderlic: (N/A) (0-50)
QB Ball Velocity: (N/A) (MPH)
Vertical Leap: 34.5 inches
Broad Jump: (N/A) inches
20 Yd Shuttle: 4.32 seconds
Three Cone: 7.13 seconds


So you can say Edelman is quicker and more explosive while Skyy is faster.

RunKC 12-23-2022 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16684763)
Edelman proday numbers:
40 Yard Dash: 4.52 seconds
40 Yard (MPH): 18.1 (MPH)
20 Yard Split: 2.58 seconds
10 Yard Split: 1.52 seconds
Bench Press: (N/A) reps (225 lb)
Vertical Leap: 36.5 inches
Height: 70.38 inches
Weight: 195 lbs
Broad Jump: 123 inches
Hand Size: (N/A) inches
Arm Length: (N/A) inches
20 Yd Shuttle: 3.92 seconds
Three Cone: 6.62 seconds


Skyy Moore combine numbers

40 Yard Dash: 4.41 seconds
40 Yard (MPH): 18.55 (MPH)
20 Yard Split: 2.51 seconds
10 Yard Split: 1.46 seconds
Bench Press: (N/A) reps (225 lb)
Wonderlic: (N/A) (0-50)
QB Ball Velocity: (N/A) (MPH)
Vertical Leap: 34.5 inches
Broad Jump: (N/A) inches
20 Yd Shuttle: 4.32 seconds
Three Cone: 7.13 seconds


So you can say Edelman is quicker and more explosive while Skyy is faster.

Skyy is a really good route runner. That makes a big difference in his poor 3 cone.

People made AB comparisons partially because of that. He wasn’t the fastest or laterally quick guys but his route running was the difference

Easy 6 12-23-2022 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16684733)
Here’s my issue with this.

Sure it’s a tough position to learn in this offense. But guys have come in early and done well.

Hardman put up numbers as a rookie. Maclin, jackson etc.

Skyy was a second round pick. If he needed that much time and development, maybe he was drafted too early?

Was he drafted too early?

Thats a fair question I guess, but he has made several splash plays so far that render the extreme pessimism unwarranted IMO

And again, I have to go back to the fact that Reid typically makes it tough for rookies to get on the field much... Tyreek Hill aside

But Skyy isn't Reek, and very few guys are

I dunno man, we've seen him occasionally dazzle in a limited role... nice routes, nice wiggle, nice hands, nice burst

Thats enough to satisfy me for now, lets give him some slack

OKchiefs 12-23-2022 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 16684734)
Edelman/Welker is still the target.

So the target of our 2nd round pick is to turn out like a 7th round pick and an UDFA, both of whom only found success in New England with Brady/Belichick? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm not seeing many (if any) examples of that type of WR to find success under Andy Reid.

NJChiefsFan 12-23-2022 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs (Post 16684799)
So the target of our 2nd round pick is to turn out like a 7th round pick and an UDFA, both of whom only found success in New England with Brady/Belichick? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm not seeing many (if any) examples of that type of WR to find success under Andy Reid.

The target is the production, not the draft position of those players. I think you know that. Pretty much every team in the league for 2 decades was trying to target their first round qbs to turn out like a sixth round pick Tom Brady.

TEX 12-23-2022 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 16684796)
Was he drafted too early?

Thats a fair question I guess, but he has made several splash plays so far that render the extreme pessimism unwarranted IMO

And again, I have to go back to the fact that Reid typically makes it tough for rookies to get on the field much... Tyreek Hill aside

But Skyy isn't Reek, and very few guys are

I dunno man, we've seen him occasionally dazzle in a limited role... nice routes, nice wiggle, nice hands, nice burst

Thats enough to satisfy me for now, lets give him some slack

Skyy isnt even Hardman.

Rainbarrel 12-23-2022 05:37 PM

Keep watching the Skyys

Chris Meck 12-23-2022 05:38 PM

I'd really like to revisit this thread...oh...about next October.

I have a feeling it'll be a laugh.

MIAdragon 12-23-2022 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16684789)
Skyy is a really good route runner. That makes a big difference in his poor 3 cone.

People made AB comparisons partially because of that. He wasn’t the fastest or laterally quick guys but his route running was the difference

I keep hearing that but hasn’t the knock been his poor route running a big reason for his lack of snaps/targets?

-King- 12-23-2022 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16684911)
I'd really like to revisit this thread...oh...about next October.

I have a feeling it'll be a laugh.

How exactly?

Does him being good in his 2nd year in your fantasy somehow cancel out criticism of him being unproductive in his rookie year?

NJChiefsFan 12-23-2022 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16684970)
How exactly?

Does him being good in his 2nd year in your fantasy somehow cancel out criticism of him being unproductive in his rookie year?

Depends on which argument you pick in this thread. It definitely cancels out the arguments that it's a bad big or he is a bust. Wouldn't cancel out the arguments of being unproductive this year

BossChief 12-23-2022 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16684970)
How exactly?

Does him being good in his 2nd year in your fantasy somehow cancel out criticism of him being unproductive in his rookie year?

A pick being a success or failure very seldom is decided in their first season. Usually only by injury in that case.

The Skyy Moore pick is going to end up one of Veaches best picks as a GM.

Easy 6 12-23-2022 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16684904)
Skyy isnt even Hardman.

A needlessly pessimistic take

I'm mad about a few things too, but just can't buy this

He doesn't have to be Mecole, all he has to do is keep producing within the system... and he is doing that

Moore is far more capable of being an every down receiver than Hardman to my eye... not as blistering fast but better able to display availability, and versatility

-King- 12-23-2022 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 16685086)
A pick being a success or failure very seldom is decided in their first season. Usually only by injury in that case.

The Skyy Moore pick is going to end up one of Veaches best picks as a GM.

No one has said it's decided. But it is fair to judge his production up to this point.

-King- 12-23-2022 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 16685140)
A needlessly pessimistic take

I'm mad about a few things too, but just can't buy this

He doesn't have to be Mecole, all he has to do is keep producing within the system...and he is doing that

Moore is far more capable of being an every down receiver than Hardman to my eye... not as blistering fast but better able to display availability, and versatility

Wut?

OKchiefs 12-23-2022 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 16685086)
A pick being a success or failure very seldom is decided in their first season. Usually only by injury in that case.

The Skyy Moore pick is going to end up one of Veaches best picks as a GM.

:LOL: ROFL LMAO

Easy 6 12-23-2022 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16685203)
Wut?

He is progressing through the system just as fast as he and Andy can manage it... prove me wrong

Bet you good money he is a key player next year

RunKC 12-23-2022 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16684733)
Here’s my issue with this.

Sure it’s a tough position to learn in this offense. But guys have come in early and done well.

Hardman put up numbers as a rookie. Maclin, jackson etc.

Skyy was a second round pick. If he needed that much time and development, maybe he was drafted too early?

Hardman was forced into action early. His rookie year was the year Tyreek got hurt for a month by being body slammed by Jalen Ramsey. Sammy Watkins was hurt during that time too (shocker). Remember the Colts loss at home where it felt like Mecole was the only decent WR we had?

Hardman had 41 targets as a rookie. Skyy has 28 and is on pace for 41.

OKchiefs 12-23-2022 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16685236)
Hardman was forced into action early. His rookie year was the year Tyreek got hurt for a month by being body slammed by Jalen Ramsey. Sammy Watkins was hurt during that time too (shocker). Remember the Colts loss at home where it felt like Mecole was the only decent WR we had?

Hardman had 41 targets as a rookie. Skyy has 28 and is on pace for 41.

We've seen Juju, Hardman, and Toney all miss time with injury, all without hardly any increase in usage outside of the LAC game.

-King- 12-24-2022 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16685236)
Hardman was forced into action early. His rookie year was the year Tyreek got hurt for a month by being body slammed by Jalen Ramsey. Sammy Watkins was hurt during that time too (shocker). Remember the Colts loss at home where it felt like Mecole was the only decent WR we had?

Hardman had 41 targets as a rookie. Skyy has 28 and is on pace for 41.

Math is hard.

ChiefsFanatic 12-24-2022 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16684556)
I’d hope he has more of a role going into next year

Guess we shall see

I think he just isn't where he is supposed to be when Mahomes looks for him.

3 of the interceptions Mahomes has thrown this year are because Skyy Moore didn't do what Mahomes expected him to do.

If you can't be where you are supposed to be, it's very hard for the QB to trust you.

Sent from my moto g stylus 5G using Tapatalk

ChiefsFanatic 12-24-2022 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 16684734)
Edelman/Welker is still the target.

Don't you think saying a Hall of Fame player is the target is a little farfetched and a little too ambitious?

Sent from my moto g stylus 5G using Tapatalk

ThyKingdomCome15 12-24-2022 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 16685347)
I think he just isn't where he is supposed to be when Mahomes looks for him.

3 of the interceptions Mahomes has thrown this year are because Skyy Moore didn't do what Mahomes expected him to do.

If you can't be where you are supposed to be, it's very hard for the QB to trust you.

Sent from my moto g stylus 5G using Tapatalk

Sky's learning curve has been steep.

Bump 12-24-2022 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 16685086)
A pick being a success or failure very seldom is decided in their first season. Usually only by injury in that case.

The Skyy Moore pick is going to end up one of Veaches best picks as a GM.

receivers can take a little bit of time, only legends have 1,000 their rookie season. But still, I think that last sentence is a little too optimistic, 200 yard rookie season doesn't scream anything. You just have to hope it's because there are 3 good receivers ahead of him, it takes a rookie longer to learn Reid's system, Watson took some PT from him, and that he'll break out next season.

BossChief 12-24-2022 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 16685350)
Don't you think saying a Hall of Fame player is the target is a little farfetched and a little too ambitious?

Sent from my moto g stylus 5G using Tapatalk

No. I really don’t.

I watched both players whole careers and when I watch Skyy Moore play, that’s the player I see. I’ve made those comparisons from before we drafted him, too.

I see a player tailor made for our offensive system.

Megatron96 12-24-2022 10:52 AM

Some CPers might remember what TG’s rookie year was like before they summarily throw Skyy onto the scrap heap. Sometimes, I mean every now and again, a player has a less than ideal start to their career. I know that sounds like excuse-making to some , but it has happened In the history of the game.

JPH83 12-24-2022 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16684911)
I'd really like to revisit this thread...oh...about next October.

I have a feeling it'll be a laugh.

No-one will admit to being wrong. I figure if it's another year like this or marginally better the naysayers can tell me I told you so. Question is what next year allows me to say the same? 600 yards? 800 yards? From my end I'm not sure but for those questioning him I'd be genuinely interested in what would change their minds

-King- 12-24-2022 12:46 PM

I'll say that it's time to give all of watsons snaps to Skyy. They're both going to make mistakes so I'd rather let Skyy make them since he's part of the future

BWillie 12-24-2022 01:34 PM

Toney is our early 2nd rd draft pick.

Skyy Moore is the guy we traded crap pics for to take a flier on him.

Well, might as well have been.

Pitt Gorilla 12-24-2022 04:22 PM

Moore looked good today.

notorious 12-24-2022 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 16687553)
Moore looked good today.

Better than a starter I'm not going to name.......

OKchiefs 12-24-2022 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 16687553)
Moore looked good today.

5 yards is pretty damn impressive

CasselGotPeedOn 12-24-2022 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 16687553)
Moore looked good today.

Wat

JPH83 12-24-2022 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16685984)
I'll say that it's time to give all of watsons snaps to Skyy. They're both going to make mistakes so I'd rather let Skyy make them since he's part of the future

Yeah, given Moore seems to block fairly well too I'm inclined to agree. Would love to know what's holding him back. Lack of understanding, lack of trust in his understanding, abundance of caution with a rookie, specific game-planning?

Megatron96 12-24-2022 05:27 PM

Skyy seemed to be the check down on several plays.

Chris Meck 12-24-2022 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPH83 (Post 16687603)
Yeah, given Moore seems to block fairly well too I'm inclined to agree. Would love to know what's holding him back. Lack of understanding, lack of trust in his understanding, abundance of caution with a rookie, specific game-planning?

yes.

Kiimo 12-24-2022 05:31 PM

How can you give Watson's snaps to Skyy when they don't play the same position it's not like Skyy is going deep

JPH83 12-24-2022 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16687651)
yes.

Ha, you think it's all of that? But man id rather have him targeted than Watson.

-King- 12-24-2022 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 16687652)
How can you give Watson's snaps to Skyy when they don't play the same position it's not like Skyy is going deep

...is he unable to go deep?

TEX 12-24-2022 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 16686443)
Toney is our early 2nd rd draft pick.

Skyy Moore is the guy we traded crap pics for to take a flier on him.

Well, might as well have been.

This type of thinking works... Its what I used to do with CEH and Sneed.

Rainbarrel 12-24-2022 06:26 PM

Hardman and Mahomes seemed to take forever to think the same

BWillie 12-24-2022 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 16687652)
How can you give Watson's snaps to Skyy when they don't play the same position it's not like Skyy is going deep

Dont know why not. Hes faster than Watson. Ran a 4.41 40 yard dash at the combine.

OKchiefs 12-25-2022 03:02 AM

Might still be a headcase, but in case anyone was wondering Pickens is now up to 700 yards and 3 TD, probably finishes the season with 800+ yards. Clearly is an elite talent, if he can keep his head on straight that’s the kind of guy we sure could have used on offense.

OKchiefs 12-25-2022 03:06 AM

Oh, and 11 snaps for Skyy Moore yesterday. Every WR on the roster is getting more reps than him.

kccrow 12-25-2022 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16685567)
Some CPers might remember what TG’s rookie year was like before they summarily throw Skyy onto the scrap heap. Sometimes, I mean every now and again, a player has a less than ideal start to their career. I know that sounds like excuse-making to some , but it has happened In the history of the game.

This would be too logical.

Boss is right to keep his projection too...

Edelman is HOF caliber except for those first 4 seasons.
Welker and Steve Smith are HOF except that first season was a real shitter.
The list carries on.

Point is that the guy could go on to have a HOF career yet. He's not trash just because of his rookie season.

If he looks lost, isn't getting PT, and is a genuine dung cake come middle of 2023, then its probably time to start firing up these talks.

JPH83 12-25-2022 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 16688126)
This would be too logical.

Boss is right to keep his projection too...

Edelman is HOF caliber except for those first 4 seasons.
Welker and Steve Smith are HOF except that first season was a real shitter.
The list carries on.

Point is that the guy could go on to have a HOF career yet. He's not trash just because of his rookie season.

If he looks lost, isn't getting PT, and is a genuine dung cake come middle of 2023, then its probably time to start firing up these talks.

I can accept it's hard to defend his production this year, but basically all of this.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.