What's more likely is that the same stodgy old voters that keep putting overrated B1G teams in positions to embarrass themselves annually will do so again.

It's not a conspiracy against Mizzou; it's just the same ol' B1G ball-licking that we always see.

You might want to try to grasp the concept of a weak schedule before saying shit like this. LMAO

You might want to learn what the word "no" means. Before you try to qualify something that just before you said didn't exist.

If you need help understanding basic language concepts maybe kcnut can have a sit down with you or something?


I have no Jawhawk clothes.

o rly?

None that I wear outside at least.

lol

Amazing to see the level of butthurt with you, it truly is. LMAO

Is there? I am just ready for basketball. I don't think there is a conspiracy. I say match up us up with another team and put the ball on the court.

I am just reading your posts...surely you realize how reeruned you are coming off?

If you want to explain yourself differently though feel free to use words that express that.

There's only so many ways that I can say that MU didn't have the elite wins or strong schedule to get a #1 over the B10 teams, ACC teams, or KU. If you can't see that, it's simply because you don't want to.

You said we didn't have any big wins.

Those were your words. If you meant something else that is fine. Use those words instead.

But what do I know...you are the guy with well over 200 posts in a Mizzou thread so I guess I am the one who is butthurt.

I don't feel the need to prove anything to rival fans in their thread but you just can't quit us can you. ROFL

Remember guys - losing to good teams means you had a better year.

Where's KU's big win, hotshot? You're not really going to try to bark up that OSU tree are you? Beating OSU without Sullinger is no more impressive than beating Cal.

Keep on crowin', beaker. You really are talking out your ass.

Missouri doesn't have big wins. - KCC

KU's wins over OSU and Georgetown elevate them over MU in the eyes of the committee, yes.

Probably time for 100 more posts in a Missouri thread telling us how butthurt we are.

lol

I think the point (valid or otherwise) was that in the non-con, Mizzou didn't play a large number of teams headed for the dance.

Is it true that Mizzou only had one game against a team headed for the NCAA tournament in the non-con? If that is the case, like it or not, it's going to hurt.

It's called hyperbole for effect. I've said many times now that it's because MU didn't have enough big wins in comparison with the others, not that they had absolutely none.

Is the Kansas loss to Baylor a good loss or a bad one?

So yeah - you're going with the OSU win. Got it. Maybe you're right and the committee voters will be as blind to names (i.e. 'B1G' and 'Ohio State') as you hope they are. If so, maybe you have a chance at that #1 afterall. BUt if they actually pay attention to the fact that KU beat an OSU squad that isn't a top 25 squad without Sullinger and lost to every other 'premier' team it played - you're probably out of luck.

And for the record, Mizzou's win over a healthy ND squad is every bit as impressive as KU's win over Georgetown, especially since we beat them by about 87 points, but that doesn't fit your horseshit narrative nearly as well.

Beakers, man...