ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Mizzou Basketball (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=255770)

eazyb81 03-11-2012 01:38 PM

When was the last time an 7 loss team got a 1 seed? I wonder if it has ever happened.

MSU's metrics look good but when you look at their entire body of work, it's not as impressive as I would have expected for them to be getting so much 1 seed hype.

Messier 03-11-2012 01:38 PM

If MU gets a 1 they won't be in St. Louis. What is more important?

eazyb81 03-11-2012 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 8440675)
If MU gets a 1 they won't be in St. Louis. What is more important?

You don't know that.

Mosbonian 03-11-2012 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8440654)
Yes, it's black and white... no way it might matter more for MU than other teams.... any stat that shows MU might be vulnerable must be cherry-picking spin by some butthurt Beaker.

Nope...just trying to point out that the observation what is being said as a liability for MU is just as much one for any team in the tourney.

And I challenge you to find where I have ever called, inferred, or mentioned butthurt beaker in my comments.

SPATCH 03-11-2012 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 8440675)
If MU gets a 1 they won't be in St. Louis. What is more important?

They might not get St. Louis if KU takes the 2 seed in that region... going to be interesting.

Bowser 03-11-2012 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8440659)
Lunardi has Kentucky, Syracuse, UNC, and the Big Ten winner as the 1 seeds... someone else is making a case for Mizzou.


(watching espn)

Didn't the Royboys lose today?

SPATCH 03-11-2012 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8440678)
You don't know that.

Isn't Kentucky a sure-thing for StL?

SPATCH 03-11-2012 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8440683)
Didn't the Royboys lose today?

doesn't matter... all of those teams lost their tourney

Mosbonian 03-11-2012 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8440683)
Didn't the Royboys lose today?

Hmmm....wonder what team in the Top 10 didn't lose this week?

(Yes I know OSU and MSU haven't played yet)

eazyb81 03-11-2012 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_spatula (Post 8440688)
Isn't Kentucky a sure-thing for StL?

No. They could easily get the Atlanta region instead. The distance from Lexington to Atlanta and St. Louis is practically the same, and UK would be in the heart of SEC country.

Bowser 03-11-2012 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_spatula (Post 8440691)
doesn't matter... all of those teams lost their tourney

This should wreck the BCS Standings once and for all!!

O.city 03-11-2012 01:43 PM

I think its bs that the big 10 teams are getting rep for a 1 seed.

Dartgod 03-11-2012 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8440668)
Iowa St: 42.2%
MU: 37.5%
OSU: 35.8%
Baylor: 31.9%
Texas: 31.1%
Kansas: 30.5%
KSU: 29.7%
A&M: 29%
Tech: 27.1%
OU: 21.9%

MU takes a lot of jump shots. Mostly open ones, but jump shots nonetheless.

OK, a pretty clear delineation between ISU/Mizzou/OSU and everyone else.

I still contend that we do not rely entirely on treys. A significant percentage of our points come from layups and free throws from our guards.

Our bigger worry, is that we start chucking up more threes that miss instead of running our offense and looking for opportunities for the wide-open three or to drive for the layup or find Ricardo for the easy points.

That's what happened in AFH. It wasn't because we were missing our shots. It was because we took poor shots.

Bearcat 03-11-2012 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 8440680)
Nope...just trying to point out that the observation what is being said as a liability for MU is just as much one for any team in the tourney.

And I challenge you to find where I have ever called, inferred, or mentioned butthurt beaker in my comments.

It's just amusing to see you guys shoot down most of what KCC posts, like he's seriously grasping at straws to make MU look bad.... he even admitted to making a mistake that only kenpom subscribers could have called him out on.

If KU has a bad shooting night, they can grind it out and win ugly... can Mizzou? It's a serious question... I've only watched a handful of their games, so I don't really know. I've seen Kansas grind it out many times... it's something I worried about with Roy, but not with Bill Self.

Mosbonian 03-11-2012 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8440695)
No. They could easily get the Atlanta region instead. The distance from Lexington to Atlanta and St. Louis is practically the same, and UK would be in the heart of SEC country.

Too much politics for UNC not to get the Atlanta region. I would love to see the Committee be less political but face it, that's not going to change....ever.

Bank on Syracuse getting the North....UNC getting the Atlanta region, Kentucky getting the Midwest region, and KU/OSU/MSU going west.

Sucks...but the basketball crones aren't going to change anything.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.