I didn't change anything. If you misinterpreted my post, that's on you. Dante Hall wasn't on the field in 00 and 01. He was in 02. That's why I said he was contributing as a 4th receiver the first time he stepped on an NFL field.

Not bad. Busy. Haven't seen you around for a while. How's everything?

I get it, the first two years he was on the field didn't really count. It only counts when he's on the field with the offense. Which took him three years. Because he wasn't any good. Which you're using as a justification for how McCluster will never get any better, because Dante Hall was great right away on offense, even though it took him three years. In the same thread where you're saying returners can't ever get any better while talking about Dante Hall, who wasn't any better as a returner his first two seasons than McCluster was last year, and then in his third season arguably because the best in the league. Because returners are all or nothing as rookies and never change.

Dante Hall wasn't really given an opportunity until his third year. That much is obvious. 17 kickoff returns and 6 punt returns is barely touching the ball AT ALL over the course of a season.

McCluster? Plenty of opportunity last year. Didn't remind anyone of Hester...or Dante Hall.

At some point you should realize the obvious here...he's just not very good. Returners don't "develop." Hester is one example...there are plenty of others.

I think every one realizes the obvious here.
Posted via Mobile Device

Yeah, I'd say you're probably right about that.

**** you guys. **** McCluster. He'll probably be off the team in three years.

Given your track record of evaluating players, I'll give that its due consideration.

Yeah I would think I could have saved you quite a bit there.

Cuddling is worth a lot to me.
Posted via Mobile Device

Sr you are a silly dude lol
Posted via Mobile Device

I'm curious to know why the misleading thread title hasnt been edited.