ChiefsPlanet
Page 32 of 40 « First 2228293031 32 33343536 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Palko told he is starting in Chicago. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=253125)

vailpass 12-01-2011 05:30 PM
What if the light bulb goes on for Palko in this game? What if he settles in and everything clicks and he wins the game looking like a starting NFL qb?

BoneKrusher 12-01-2011 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAX (Post 8159520)
Hmmm ... next great Chiefs QB ... ... hmmmmm.

Steven Leroy DeBerg was great at one time.

Well, he was next at one time, anyway.

FAX
i forgot about Steve Deberg
the ones that stand out as duds to me are:


Steve (oh-no) Bono
Elvis
Thigpen
Huard
Croyle
Cassel
Palko

FAX 12-01-2011 05:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8159525)
What if the light bulb goes on for Palko in this game? What if he settles in and everything clicks and he wins the game looking like a starting NFL qb?
Chickens and monkeys will emerge in droves from Lenny's buttocks. Dogs will sleep with cats and the Pope will announce that he's gayer than a bag of rainbows.

FAX

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-01-2011 06:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8158263)
Freeman did not meet hardly any of the Parcells quarterback pillars.

He came out as a junior.
He did not win 23 games.
As far as I can find, he did not graduate.
He really wasn't even a full three-year starter as he took over the starting role in the sixth week in 2006.

Maybe Parcell's method is antiquated, but it was probably a portion of the criteria Pioli used to assess QBs.
I've already pointed this out, but neither Brady nor Bledsoe met Parcells' definition. It's complete ****ing hypocrisy.

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-01-2011 06:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8158115)
Explain what the problem with this is?

I want a QB in the first. I've said if that can't happen, then yes try to deal for Manning after they take Luck and be great for the next few years.

If your take is...

- I don't want to hear anything outside of taking a QB in the 1st. (Fine. I like that plan also. I admire your determination)

- I don't think it's realistic to get Manning. (I'll agree it's not likely)

Both of which I agree with.
Remove yourself from the situation. Your solution, for the Kansas City Chiefs, is to trade a first round draft pick for an aging, declining HOF QB with grave injury concerns.

Have you learned nothing from history?

Hammock Parties 12-01-2011 06:07 PM
Maybe two years after we trade for Manning we can sign Curtis Painter and he'll lead us to a 13-3 season.

ILChief 12-01-2011 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8159596)
Remove yourself from the situation. Your solution, for the Kansas City Chiefs, is to trade a first round draft pick for an aging, declining HOF QB with grave injury concerns.

Have you learned nothing from history?
Not the route I prefer but the only time in the last 30+ years we have even sniffed a super bowl was with an aging, declining HOF qb with injury concerns

jd1020 12-01-2011 06:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omega (Post 8159609)
Maybe two years after we trade for Manning we can sign Curtis Painter and he'll lead us to a 13-3 season.
Why do that when we can just sign Flynn to another 60mil contract this off season? Seems far more beneficial than drafting a QB for 4/15.

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-01-2011 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 8159617)
Not the route I prefer but the only time in the last 30+ years we have even sniffed a super bowl was with an aging, declining HOF qb with injury concerns
Given that the QB you reference wasn't Ichabod Crane, I'm not sure how it helps us.

FAX 12-01-2011 06:25 PM
Ichabod was a hell of a quarterback in his day, though. The only serious knock against the guy was his inability to see the entire field. Or any part of the field, really. Since he had a punkin for a head and all.

FAX

BossChief 12-01-2011 06:27 PM
Manning is past the "aging" stage.

He will be 36 in march and has a broken neck.

If we give our first rounder for that, we damn well better be making a move quickly to draft his replacement.

DeezNutz 12-01-2011 07:39 PM
If we trade a first rounder for an old, seriously injured QB, the Chiefs and I will be on a break.

O.city 12-01-2011 07:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8159812)
If we trade a first rounder for an old, seriously injured QB, the Chiefs and I will be on a break.
We will be on a break for good. I'll be pretty much done.

stonedstooge 12-01-2011 07:43 PM
Manning was being checked today. Haven't heard anything about him being cleared to play

Tombstone RJ 12-01-2011 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 8156213)
Just to be clear:


AbOrton:


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FhR4p6fFZBk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
love the announcer: "Maybe it's a wet football, maybe he was just trying to hurry the play...."

Maybe he sucks?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 PM.
Page 32 of 40 « First 2228293031 32 33343536 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.