Agreed. And they suck at stopping the run.

Yeah, good luck with your ban.

Great idea. An amazing idea. Let's do this.

Did someone fart in here?

Thought I smelled something...

Our bye week was week 4 and we had more injuries than any of the team's we faced. Played the AFC #1 seed on the road, and the NFC #2,3,5 and the Rams.. mostly on the road.

Feel free to provide some metric or evidence for why that wasn't the hardest stretch

I can see both sides. CP prides itself on being free and open and tough. We don't neeed mods to baby sit IMO. We got this.



It is annoying and if one particular guy spams too much, then sure....banhammer but all in all I prefer freedom and don;t need mods to protect my feelings.


I personally thank the mods and think theyre doing a hell of a job and riding a good line. Keep it up boys.

I respectfully disgaree. I think its a terrible idea....just enforce the rules we have..athat is all that is needed. We are supposed to be a tough message board and thick skin...lets prove that.

We don't "approve" people, dipshit.

Yeah, the same runs that would go for 5 yards against MN might go to the house against GB. Shanny even impled that in the press conference after the MN game. MN's safeties and linebackers are too notch though.

Having a bye on week 4 is tough, but your schedule is your schedule. We had a pretty tough go of it ourselves with injuries and strength of schedule.

We played :

Minnesota
Green Bay
Baltimore
Houstonx2
Tennesseex2
New England

Of course, we got lucky that our bye was so late in the season so that we got to heal up a bit. Can't underestimate that...

And with a snap of the fingers from the Mighty Deface- the trolls turned to dust.

Nice work! :thumb:

Fellas, you might as well get used to that type of talk, because it's going to be thrown in your face by every person trying to discredit the success of the Chiefs.

There's no way what has happened in this thread can be seen a a productive argument or discussion. Everyone knows how your posting style is so it makes sense that you like this kind of chaos though.

OOOOOOOOOOOooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Talking about the playoffs, notice how I only mentioned what the teams did in the playoffs? Not the 6+ games stretch you refer to?

The Minnesota defense was great, but when their offense led by Kirk Cousins can't muster up more than 10 points, it makes it hard to win that game no matter how disruptive your defense is. Looking at the stats, the Minnesota defense was just outside the top 10 for the season for defense in total yards, rushing and passing, the only category where I'd consider them one of the best is points allowed where they were top 5.

Do you know how many playoff teams Minnesota faced this year? 4 of them, Packers x2, Eagles at home, Chiefs on the road, and Seahawks on the road. Their record was 1-4 with giving up point values of 21, 20, 26, 37, and 23. They're good, but not as great as you're making them out to be.

Then what's the point of banning or rompering someone if they can just make a new account? Do you even check IPs? You can't tell me that you just allow anyone to sign up and start posting? If so, then I'm not the dipshit, dipshit.

Not to mention the weather and field conditions this team had to overcome.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof



Your and idiot. You can't prove a negative. I can't logically prove that the niners didnt have the toughest 6 game stretch of all time, because thats not how basic logic works. If you weren't a ****ing moron you would know that because they literally teach that in high school. So I suppose youre a drop out.


https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance


It is an argument from IGNORANCE , with your claim being that as long as no one can disprove it, your argument must be true. You can't disprove my penis is 10 inches long and I can bench 350 so that must be true also? Right genious?


Its simply ridiculous to cherry pick some stats and claim that the 6 games the niners played were the toughest 6 in a row of all time....the burden of proof would be on YOU to prove the claim....and so far youve got a bunch of baloney for evidence...

It's been that way for weeks now. A couple of pages of legitimate discussion then some tard starts up another flame war.

Minnesota will never be great with Kirk Cousins under center. He's like a poor man's Alex Smith, albeit an overpaid one.

It's the 9er fans breath ATM is a big deal in Cali

Especially that Mexico City field.

WOOF.

ROFL
Bass-to-trout

yes, you are a total and complete dipshit


just ****ing stop


youre a pussy too if you can't handle a couple of trolls WTF are you even doing here?



You acting like this is just proof that you are a pussy and dipshit...which I already knew

When these 49er trolls are banned to the Romper room- they should have to have Brooke Pryor's face as their avatar. A living image of their true self.

Back in the old days they would tar and shackle trolls, then hang them by the yardarms as a warning to all coming into the bay.

We can use Brooke's face now, which is a worse punishment than a slow agonizing death.

Yes, we just allow anyone to sign up and start posting. Dipshit.

Apparently so. Dipshit.

This is somehow both the most interesting and lamest flamewar I've ever seen on CP.

Go **** yourself, 'mo. I was asked to not respond to the troll and make things worse. So I didn't. You don't know dick.

You don't understand the concepts you're trying to use. You can prove that stretch wasn't the hardest by providing one harder.

It got boring, quick.

I'm out.

Interesting question
 

Here's an adaptation of a question run on a local SF sport station this morning for KC fans. Would you rather your offense have the ball on their own 25 yard line with 2 minutes left in the game and down by 6, or would you rather SF have your defense on the field with SF down by 6 on their 25 yard line with 2 minutes left?

Listener responses in SF overwhelming wanted the ball down 6. What say you?

Jesus youre a spazztic window licking moron. These guys are literally the best at what they do. This isnt just the best Chiefs message board and news source, its the best NFL message board and youre sitting here second guessing shit because youre a panicking pussy. calm down, mary. These guys got this. WE GOT THIS. We can handle a couple trolls...as long as everyone follows the rules theres literally no need to do anything different than we normally do things...

All22, meet Pawnmower. A bigger fan of himself than anyone you'll ever meet.

Well Points Allowed is really the only one that matters at the end of the day. But that said, I was talking about scheme and personnel. The Vikings are awesome at both and have been for years.

ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL


The burden of proof is not with me....its with the claimant (you). Ive already explained this to you and I am not surprised you do not get it. Honest question: did you finish high school?

I'd guess most people would want their team to have the ball just because that feels like you're more in control.

But the reality? You definitely want the lead. Anyone who says otherwise doesn't understand probabilities.

You're just a keyboard warrior. I guarantee you wouldn't call me names to my face like that. I asked a valid question as to what's the point of banning or rompering someone if they can just sign up with a new account? Simple.

Actually he does.

And you are right All22 you had one of the hardest stretches in NFL history, except what pawnmower is explaining to you, is you can’t just walk in a room and say “this is true, prove me wrong” and walk out and say how right you are if no one proves you wrong. The burden of proof is set on you, providing a link, showing statistical data etc.

Your way of conversation and proving a point is actually the exact opposite of how they teach people to approach a discussion.

Did you guys play on a shitty Mexican field, then in a tornado, monsoon at Foxboro, snowstorm, then back to back sub-zero wind chill games? Then back to back freezing game in the playoffs?

The Chiefs are battle-tested in any and all weather conditions.

Telling. People are terrified of Mahomes. They should be terrified our defense too, bitch.

Agreed. I’d rather have the lead because all it takes is one bobble, a dropped pass, an untimely penalty and the team coming from behind is screwed. Just too many ways things can go wrong.

Really enjoyed the offensive approach in the Bears game. They have a pretty good defense and it was cool to see the Chiefs grinding a lot of clock with good scoring drives. They scored 26, but it felt like they could have scored 40 if they wanted.

Mack was a beast in that one too. It wasn’t like Mahomes didn’t deal with any sort of pressure. Still made stuff work.

Absolutely, 100%. They were in total and complete control.

The gambler's take...I love it. But, what about Mahomes? Part of the reason the listeners didn't want the lead and their defense on the field was Mahomes, particularly if you changed the hypothetical to KC only down 2 -- they figured there was no way for SF's defense to prevent Mahomes from driving 50 yards.

Fat fingered the thumbs down. Should've been thumbs up. My bad, dawg.

No, he claimed I used an argument that was impossible to disprove. I did not.

As far as burden of proof, well, I'm new here so I can't use links in posts. I provided headlines and the information is otherwise widely reported and available.

His claim was that the widely reported information is wrong. Therefore the burden of proof is with him.

not surprised in the least you take the side of ALexians and niner's fans


huge pansy

49ers fans had to put on a windbreaker their last home playoff game-Nobody has ever had it that bad before!!!!

But I never enjoy leaving the game in the hands of a kicker.

Perhaps they don't know your defense that well? They discussed Clark at length in the same show and noted that statistically KC is better than SF's defense in some ways. Still, it was the concern of Mahomes with the ball and a tired SF defense that were the prime factors.

The Chargers have stymied Mahomes a bit the last three times we've played them.

Yeah, I felt like KC did a great job in that game. Might see a somewhat similar approach against the Niners.

It's probably shifted for Mahomes, but PFR's win probability calculator says that the team down by 6 is only a 17% chance to win in that situation. I'll take the lead all day long.

LOL...I had my beanie in my pocket just in case.

Derwin James is a ****ing freak. He's the reason.

You've never been friendly. Why would I ever take your side? Ever?? Your whole "keyboard warrior" schtick runs thin. You post like you're tough, but you're not. It's kind of pathetic, really.

If you had thicker skin, you wouldn't care that I "take the side ALexian's and niners fans" (I don't)...but you're just being a little bitch. Figured you could "handle it." And I can say that to you, whether on a keyboard or in person, because I can back it up, Mother****er. In real life, I'm anything but a huge pansy. It's well documented. So talk all the shit you want. I know what you are. Just a keyboard warrior. You feel tough typing that shit out? Does it give you a stiffy? Does it make you feel better about yourself?

Sounds like you're the one with an issue. I have no interest in going back and forth with you, at all. It's tiring. So, if I annoy you that much, just put me on ignore. It's simple. This isn't the thread for this. If you hate me that much, then just put me on ignore. No great shakes, not like I care much about what you post anyway. Then we'll both be happy.

If not, then leave me the **** alone. I'm sick of you.

Thats not exactly my claim. I claimed that 1) its not my burden to prove your statement is invalid, or else it suddenly is valid... and 2) I cant logically prove a negative (you asked me to prove it WASNT true) very easily....



Your evidence is based on winning %. If you go back and read my post youll see that I do not believe that winning % of the niner's opponents in a 6 game 2020 is an accurate enough measure of "toughness" to make the claim that it was the "toughest" 6 game stretch of all time. The most you can say is that you played a 6 game stretch against teams with the highest win %.


Im sorry youre not smart enough to understand or read my actual argument. But in my mind "toughness" doesnt necessarily correspond 1:1 to win %. There are some years where even 3 really good teams have been in the same division and hurt each other's winning %. There are years with a crappy division where a teams winning % is inflated.... If your ONLY measure is win % , I don't personally find that ENOUGH evidence of "the toughest 6 game streak' of all time.that is a bold clai.....because theres so many other factors involved.

ROFL

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">According to B/R’s <a href="https://twitter.com/mikefreemanNFL?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MikeFreemanNFL</a>, several assistant coaches and executives around the NFL expect Kansas City to win big against San Francisco. <br><br>Freeman is “stunned” by how confident they are ♨️ <a href="https://t.co/ERaVXOft7K">pic.twitter.com/ERaVXOft7K</a></p>&mdash; B/R Gridiron (@brgridiron) <a href="https://twitter.com/brgridiron/status/1220073652152098816?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 22, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

You do. You didn't look at what I was saying. You don;t like me so you took an ALexian/ SF guys side just to spite me ..and ignored what I was actually saying in my post.


I give lots of positive and negative feedback to people. If youve been the recipient of mostly negative feedback, its because you say a lot of stupid shit in my eyes...I literally neg and pos people constantly and most people i have both neg and pos given to them. I'd bet I have given you at least ONE positive over the years....maybe?


Clearly you cant separate your butthurt from facts and logic so you jump in the arms of an alexsexual when convienient to spite someone you don;t like, even though you aren;t smart enough to actually read what is written or understand the argument.


Thats why youre a moron. Say something intelligent and you'll find that I make a friendly comment or positve rep. Talking shit about the great job the mods are doing and high fiving dipshit niners trolls is NOT the kind of posts I am going to be friendly to.

It doesn't really surprise me. The issue with the 9ers is that their path to victory is pretty narrow. In looking over Mahomes's career, 23 points is pretty much the floor of what he's gonna score (outside of a fluky Colts game when he was banged up), and he's never lost by more than 8 points.

It's really just a matter of whether the 9ers offense can keep up. If their run game continues to be super effective, they've got a shot, but if our defense shuts that down (as they have for about 6 games in a row now), it could get ugly fast.

To put it another way, if the 9ers win, it's gonna be a dogfight. The Chiefs have the potential to turn it into a rout.

Man, I wish I shared that confidence with those folks.

And they have 2 really good corners.

They are a more balanced D than the 49ers, even if they aren’t as good.

You're still mis-using the fallacies. Proving a negative would be to prove a harder stretch doesn't exist. It is absolutely possible to prove that one does does exist.

Regarding inflated winning percentages and such... We're in the best division in football. Our division was one FG away from having 3 teams in the playoffs and has repped the NFC in the Superbowl 4 of the last 7 years

The burden of proof still isn’t with him. You make a claim it’s true, he turns around and says it’s not. Your back to square 1. How entitled do you think you are? I truly hope you don’t act this way in real life. The burden of proof is always on the person presenting the fact. I’f your only evidence is, well it’s true, the information is readily available by google, anyone can say, well it’s not, the information is readily available via google. It’s not until you provide facts and data that the burden of proving you wrong falls on someone else. . .

Furthermore, I am saying that winning % is perhaps not the best way to "prove" that that particular stretch was the "toughest"... So I guess I am disputing the entire premise that winning % is ALWAYS the best indicator of a "tough" team...My point is a team with a higher win % at a certain point in the season doesnt always mean they are the toughest or best team...depending on opponents, home/away, injury, flukey plays or luck...etc....



If you're going to make the really bold claim that that particular stretch of 6 games was the TOUGHEST not only of this year but of all time, I think it might be a good idea to have more than win % as your ammo -- otherwise just stick to the facts of that stretch was against teams who had the highest win %....

Invalid hypothetical, as we’ll be up by 10+ points with 2:00 left.

I know one thing, Spags vs. Shanny Jr. is a much better matchup for us than Saleh vs. Reid is for them.

Ok thats fine but then its your burden to come up with other metrics and study all of the 6 game stretches in the entire history of the NFL and prove to me that that 6 games the niners played was indeed the hardest / tough 6 games of all time. Its not my burden to do all of that work, because it isn't my ridiculous claim. You'd have to study the different eras of football and the times when there was only 3 divisions and the eras when strength of schedule actually mattered in scheduling etc...and the pre-salary cap eras when there were stacked teams with infinite budgests and easy teams....etc...


I am saying JUST looking at win % for a 6 game stretch this year for SF is not sufficient to prove your claim that this 6 games is hands down the hardest 6 in a row for ANY TEAM for ALL TIME.... and for me to disprove it is essentially not practical / possible. If you'd like to ACTUALLY prove your claim by doing all of that work and providing some other metrics and comparison of the eras...feel free. As I have explained it isn't my burden nor is it really possible (for me or most people).


Until then, in my eyes your argument that that 6 game stretch was the "toughest of all time" is not proven.

Chargers are a more talented defense than SF. Bosa, Ingram and Tillery is a damn good pass rusher and King, Heyward and James is a top 5 secondary.

We still scored 24 on them before the end of the 3rd quarter.

Mahomes will destroy them

Andy probably had his Super Bowl game plan ready for years and it has been encased in a fire alarm box. In Case of Super Bowl, Break Glass!

The glass has been broken now.

I expect to see a game plan for the ages.

Of course the flip side is we have cocky Niner fans who think it’s a repeat of Marino getting blown out by Montana and Manning getting blown out by Seattle. Never mind that KC has better weapons and Marino/Manning were not a threat to scramble.

Can't we all just agree that DVOA is far superior to any subjective observations? :)

So apparently some of the trolls got banned/rompered?

Especially with their #1 plan being to slow the game down and run Mostert..


Agree....I think a lead is essential ..the earlier the better....because it will change their plan of what they would like to do...Hopefully we can start hot but I have confidence in our adjustments. Weve been making great adjustments lately on both sides of the ball.

I think it is, and it isn't.

But it is (DVOA) better probably at least 95% of the time.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/QtziCNSreJk" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Here is the companion video for the last where Mahomes mobility is discussed more in depth.

I’ll take our front 4 over SD. As far as their secondary, 100% agree, those names are stellar.

But as a unit, .9ers play better than SD loaded Secondary.

What’s rompered??