ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Palko told he is starting in Chicago. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=253125)

BigMeatballDave 12-01-2011 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 8159853)
love the announcer: "Maybe it's a wet football, maybe he was just trying to hurry the play...."

Maybe he sucks?

Eh, every QB has had that happen.

Tombstone RJ 12-01-2011 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8159863)
Eh, every QB has had that happen.

of course you're right, this happens all the time...

evolve27 12-01-2011 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 8159676)
Ichabod was a hell of a quarterback in his day, though. The only serious knock against the guy was his inability to see the entire field. Or any part of the field, really. Since he had a punkin for a head and all.

FAX

Palko is a great guy in the film room. Work ethic is par none.

O.city 12-01-2011 08:18 PM

I said it in some thread don't remember which one.

Until the FO realizes that talent trumps heart in the NFL we are swimming in a pool of mediocrity

BigMeatballDave 12-01-2011 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evolve27 (Post 8159901)
Palko is a great guy in the film room. Work ethic is par none.

:) I see what you did there...

milkman 12-01-2011 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 8159617)
Not the route I prefer but the only time in the last 30+ years we have even sniffed a super bowl was with an aging, declining HOF qb with injury concerns

And who'd have guessed that declining HOF QB would be injured before actually leading the team to a SB?

History tells us that only 4 SBs, if I remember correctly, have been won by QBs over the age of 33.

FAX 12-01-2011 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evolve27 (Post 8159901)
Palko is a great guy in the film room. Work ethic is par none.

Yep.

FAX

chiefzilla1501 12-01-2011 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega (Post 8158154)
Yeah, but you can't really say he'd be doing that in KC, and he's a young player with room to improve.

I'd feel a lot better about our QB position if we had Freeman on the roster right now and anyone that disagrees is lying.

Maybe so. Or maybe they wasted three years on an okay QB that's not franchise. I think Tampa and the Jets are both really wondering the same thing.

I want a first round QB too and think that's the only way we should go. But choosing the wrong first rounder will set the franchise backward too. A few years from now, the Bucs may end up saying... maybe we should have gone the Browns' route (with Brady Quinn) and cut our losses.

BossChief 12-02-2011 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8159812)
If we trade a first rounder for an old, seriously injured QB, the Chiefs and I will be on a break.

Lets say we give up next years first for Peyton and this years first for the best quarterback available.

I would be on board with that, but if we trade this years first for him, that will be really hard to take.

That injury puts him one hit away from retirement and if we risk a top ten pick on that....

FAX 12-02-2011 02:26 AM

Please, guys.

Can we stop with the Peyton Manning acquisition talk? It's making me want to kill a puppy.

FAX

Nightfyre 12-02-2011 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 8160582)
Please, guys.

Can we stop with the Peyton Manning acquisition talk? It's making me want to kill a puppy.

FAX

+1

Smed1065 12-02-2011 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8159863)
Eh, every QB has had that happen.

Every no. Just your dates.

Smed1065 12-02-2011 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 8160582)
Please, guys.

Can we stop with the Peyton Manning acquisition talk? It's making me want to kill a puppy.

FAX

I will kill of so./ :cuss:

BigMeatballDave 12-02-2011 05:34 AM

Smed is either a crackhead, or has Alzheimers.

tredadda 12-02-2011 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8160236)
Maybe so. Or maybe they wasted three years on an okay QB that's not franchise. I think Tampa and the Jets are both really wondering the same thing.

I want a first round QB too and think that's the only way we should go. But choosing the wrong first rounder will set the franchise backward too. A few years from now, the Bucs may end up saying... maybe we should have gone the Browns' route (with Brady Quinn) and cut our losses.

"But choosing the wrong first rounder will set the franchise backward too." How is that any different than picking up career back up? We have three playoff wins since SB IV. From a playoff standpoint, drafting a 1st round QB and failing with him cant set us back anymore than the crap we constantly bring in does.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.