ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs are planning to retain Romeo Crennel and remove interim tag (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=254742)

SAUTO 01-08-2012 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by burt (Post 8274346)
One thing I know for certain......nothing is certain.

Miss cleo has reproduced at an alarming rate lately
Posted via Mobile Device

burt 01-08-2012 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8274348)
Miss cleo has reproduced at an alarming rate lately
Posted via Mobile Device

Ya gotta love a psychic that loves sex!

SAUTO 01-08-2012 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by burt (Post 8274351)
Ya gotta love a psychic that loves sex!

At least shes not surprised when you hit the wrong hole.
Posted via Mobile Device

Rausch 01-08-2012 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8274181)
i bet he wants to keep Orton.

Uh, who doesn't?

Keep Orton and ****ing electrocute C@$$#ole and Palko...

chiefzilla1501 01-08-2012 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8274220)
There is zero chance we draft a QB with a 64-year old HC. Zero. Ask Dick Vermeil about it...

It doesn't help that in Cleveland, he made a mockery of the QB situation. You think Haley put Palko out too long, Romeo relentlessly stuck with Derek Anderson longer when they had a young first round draft pick in Quinn sitting on the bench.

BossChief 01-08-2012 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8274220)
There is zero chance we draft a QB with a 64-year old HC. Zero. Ask Dick Vermeil about it...

Not sure about that.

At 60, he pushed to trade up for Quinn and spend over 3 times the "draft value chart" amount to do so.

chiefzilla1501 01-08-2012 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8274562)
Not sure about that.

At 60, he pushed to trade up for Quinn and spend over 3 times the "draft value chart" amount to do so.

Yeah, but you're assuming that was him and not Phil Savage making that move. And it's also worth noting that they passed on him with their first pick.

Here's a taste of how Romeo handled the QB situation in Cleveland. Quinn was drafted in 2007. Derek Anderson had a terrific year, so without question, he was the undisputed starter. In 2008, Anderson had a concussion in the preseason and played terribly. Halfway through the season, Romeo made the switch to Quinn. Quinn started a few games, played well, and then missed the rest of the season to injury. Anderson goes back in and plays terribly. The next season, Romeo announces Quinn is the starter. After 2 games, he hooks Quinn. He then for some reason decides to stick with Anderson for something like 10 games even though he was playing miserably bad. After finally responding to mass criticism, Romeo does the right thing and makes the QB switch.

So if history is any indication... Romeo's handling of the QB situation was downright atrocious. And he gave up on Quinn after only 2 games.

BossChief 01-08-2012 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8274380)
It doesn't help that in Cleveland, he made a mockery of the QB situation. You think Haley put Palko out too long, Romeo relentlessly stuck with Derek Anderson longer when they had a young first round draft pick in Quinn sitting on the bench.

He overspent to move up for a kid that his buddy Weis spoke up for and then made the fatal mistake of not having anyone of quality that could properly develop him.

Quinn was completely clueless whenever he got on the field and Derek Anderson had a really good year in 06 that made things more difficult.

Mistakes were made by a first time head coach.

Guys like Romeo have lasted in the NFL because they learn from those mistakes.

Hopefully, Romeo has indeed done so.

orange 01-08-2012 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8271392)
I'll eat some for hte Cassel debacle. Thought he would be better by now. Even defended him a few times.

But I've moved on. I'm driving the trade up for Luck truck. It's gaining passengers by the day
.

Reminds me of the ferry boat in War of the Worlds.

chiefzilla1501 01-08-2012 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8274611)
He overspent to move up for a kid that his buddy Weis spoke up for and then made the fatal mistake of not having anyone of quality that could properly develop him.

Quinn was completely clueless whenever he got on the field and Derek Anderson had a really good year in 06 that made things more difficult.

Mistakes were made by a first time head coach.

Guys like Romeo have lasted in the NFL because they learn from those mistakes.

Hopefully, Romeo has indeed done so.

Maybe he has learned. First off, I think your post makes it clear that if Stanzi wasn't ready, then he shouldn't have played. Just the same as Quinn. But we're not talking about a rookie 5th round QB. We're talking about a third year, first round pick starter that was pulled after only two games in favor of a QB who was disgustingly bad the prior season and also that offseason/preseason. We've gotten all hung up on Stanzi vs. Palko... imagine this scenario. Imagine if Romeo started Stanzi for two games, he struggled, then Romeo started Palko for 10 more games even though Palko was an even bigger disaster. That's essentially how Romeo handled Brady Quinn.

In that QB decision, Romeo showed frustrating indecision, a stubbornness to stand behind a QB who was clearly the wrong guy, and the impatience to let his young QB try to win games on the field. If Romeo was unpleased with Quinn's progress, then he had 3 years to get rid of the inept QBs coach. He didn't.

I get that Romeo can change and he can learn. But I think people are downplaying what a cluster**** he turned the QB situation in Cleveland. And if history is any indication, it doesn't look good at all if we're hoping to develop a QB.

Brock 01-08-2012 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8274598)
So if history is any indication... Romeo's handling of the QB situation was downright atrocious. And he gave up on Quinn after only 2 games.

If history is any indication, he was right. That guy is awful.

Titty Meat 01-08-2012 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8274562)
Not sure about that.

At 60, he pushed to trade up for Quinn and spend over 3 times the "draft value chart" amount to do so.

I'll bet you a ban for a year that he doesn't draft a QB round 1 this year.

O.city 01-08-2012 12:38 PM

And the plot thickens.

BossChief 01-08-2012 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 8274659)
If history is any indication, he was right. That guy is awful.

Yup.

That guy was every bit as bad as Palko. Maybe worse.

Acting as if Romeo should have played him more is crazy.

chiefzilla1501 01-08-2012 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 8274659)
If history is any indication, he was right. That guy is awful.

That's no defense to the decision to start Anderson for 10 games over Quinn when Anderson was playing atrociously bad football.

Isn't our claim that if we have a veteran whose a proven loser, let's see what the young kid's got? And by year 3, there is simply no excuse for the QB not to be ready to play. If he isn't, that's a major indictment on your coaching staff. Neither scenario looks good.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.