![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
They are winning because their HC rewrote their entire offense to play on the strengths of the FB taking the snaps. I would take Palko over Tebow. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You are never going to win anything with either one of them. But Palko IS the better QB. |
3-1
The vocal majority doesn't reflect the overall majority As in life |
Quote:
|
I am surprised by the results of this poll.
Haley clearly has some problems to work out, but at this point, I don't really care either way. Get this team a QB, and the rest will work itself out. |
Todd Failey is Pioli fodder.
Failey didn't give Matt Ca$$el 64 MILLION dollars.... just sayin' ▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬ |
Quote:
Haley took over a team where several young stars were in place. Herm had Huard, Croyle and Thigpen....which are all much worse than Cassel. Haley has done some good things. And, if his answer at OC wasn't Bill Muir, then I would be behind him 100%. |
Quote:
But, is it enough? Will they ever be as good as they could be with a coach that could actually manage relationships? |
Quote:
#1) Tebows ability to avoid the big msitakes. Palko makes a lot of bad plays. #2) Tebows ability to lead the team. #3) Tebows ability to elevate his game when he needs to. Palko isn't enough better as a passer to make up for any of these. |
Quote:
Cassel, sadly, is not better that Huard and Thigpen. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Who cares about how many points they score? With Palko at the helm, the strategy is to keep the ball out of the hands of the QB and simplify the playcalling. And we can all day call out running Battle to the outside and Dex to the inside, but when we run Battle up the middle and Dex to the outside, those plays don't work either because defenses are prepared for it. The offense is a lose-lose situation. We don't have either a RB or a QB that can take over. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.