Who will you hate in the SEC? You're gonna have trouble coming up with the true hatred you've had for us all along.

Arkansas. It's like Kansas with hills. Even has "kansas" in the name. :thumb:

I should have figure that out, duh.

I can respect that.

FTR, I think you guys are much less susceptible to the Old Jedi Mind Trick. :D

If not Arkansas, I'm sure Fraz will come up with someone.

Hating Kansas is sorta like hating Denver. At first, you don't really notice them, then they slowly grow on you. Much like a fungus . . . a really annoying fungus.

You had exactly 1 person on your team willing to attack the rim, and he immediately put Ratliff in foul trouble despite Ratliff rarely even leaving the ground, let alone making contact that wasn't initiated by Thomas. It's hard to draw fouls when you're settling for (and drilling) jump shots. KU was smart not to drive; the jumpers were falling. At the same time, they weren't driving. You're not going to draw fouls when you're content with taking 12-footers all night.

The foul discrepancy was because MU plays a drive/kick style initiated by very quick guards. Dixon, Pressey, Denmon and even English where attacking the rim and trying to get Whithey and Robinson in foul trouble. It didn't work with those guys, but Wesley and the rest were certainly getting in there and committing fouls. Mizzou has done that all year and they've also done a very nice job of avoiding foul trouble, even on the road. They won the Baylor game on the road because they had something like a 2-1 FT margin. There wasn't any home-cooking; it's just how Mizzou plays.

And I can find you a missed call on every single offensive possession. I honestly could not care less about 'missed' calls - they are what they are. Over the course of a game, they balance out. But you can cite those late charge calls all you want; one of them was absolutely the right call (Taylors) and Robinson's was no worse than borderline. I'd be irritated if I were on your end, but he did put an elbow into a defenders chest and that's been called all season.

The refs didn't lose the game for KU tonight.

My brother-in-law is a Kentucky grad, and he's enough of an annoying douche that I can hate Kentucky based on that alone. :grr:

And I've always despised all things Floriduh.

They definitely have you out hillbillied(is that a word, it is now), Do they show deliverance scenes on the big board down there?

All right, if you're so convinced that playing style is the real reason behind that differential and not the home cooking that every home team gets in the NCAA, let's make a bet. I'll bet you that KU ends up on the positive side of both those statistics when they play next at AFH. Missouri will have ended up committing more fouls and KU will end up shooting more FTs. If that's doesn't happen, I'll admit that you are right and that you have a legitimate point here about this game.

I find it disgusting you comparing KU to the donkeys, better say some prayers. That will surely leave a mark with the big fella, and I ain't talkin' bout Tebo(w).

This, BTW, doesn't look like any charge I've ever seen, so I'll have to disagree with you there.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net...64215071_n.jpg

Or, OR -

KU just didn't play defense worth a **** down the stretch? Yeah, I know, unpossible.


I suspect it will take you some time to get over this loss. And convince yourself it was the refs. Excuses and assholes, everyone has one.

Or there were multiple reasons for what we saw down the stretch, including the home cooking refereeing.


It's a regular season college basketball game. I recognized the loss meant virtually nothing when the game ended.

Sure. Repeat that in the mirror a hundred times, and you MAY believe it.

And seriously, shut up about refs and home cooking, hypocrite.