Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8845161)

This thread needs to die in a fire. Its completely infected with suck...

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8841667)

We don't need a project QB. We are in position to make a run right now. Put him on the practice squad. If a better prospect gets cut, pick them up like we did Thigpen a few years back.

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 8845179)

Thanks for dragging it down further, Beaker Boy. :clap:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8841700)

All teams need a developmental QB - at least all SMART teams do. If you want to try and hide him on the PS, go ahead. I'm pretty sure they won't. They like him. They actually like him alot.

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 8845182)

Who is going to make the roster in the place of the 3rd string QB that will put this team over the edge? :doh!:

A team should always have a young QB in the 3 spot that they are developing. Always.

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845301)

A kickoff specialist? J/K No seriously, who cares? Half the league only goes with two QBs. It only makes since to keep three if you have three good ones.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8845316)

Or if you finished the previous season starting a guy you got on the waiver wire 2/3 of the way through the season...

Originally Posted by pimpchief (Post 8845386)

I want tanney as our third qb.

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8845390)

I'd like to see what he could do. Apparently you can't tell the difference between him and Stanzi on the practice field. Maybe you can tell the difference in the game.

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8841636)

Maybe not that one game, but when you look at the other five, I can see it. Remember when we drafted McGee in the 3rd round a couple of years ago and then quickly traded him Tampa after one season? This is the same thing imo. We need to cut our losses and move on. He should be better at this point and he honestly hasn't shown anything. What has he learned? Has he gotten better?

I can't believe some guys say it wasn't that bad! I'm sorry but it was terrible. It's not even Thursday yet and some of you Stanzi sympathizers are already getting beer goggles again. He caused the sacks because he held the ball to long. The pick wasn't flukey at all. He's lucky Copper knocked it away and tried to save him. Otherwise, it might have been gone for a pick six because Copper was double covered and Stanzi blatently stared down the receiver all the way.

In the end, Stanzi doesn't move the ball. You have to move the ball. Thigpen moved the ball. Palko and Croyle did not. Thigpen is still in the league. It's really that simple. If Stanzi is going to make it, he needs to move the damn chains.

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8845301)

A kickoff specialist? J/K No seriously, who cares? Half the league only goes with two QBs. It only makes since to keep three if you have three good ones.

The truth is that project QBs are a thing of the past. Nobody waits long and guys don't get much time. Most of the teams that have three QBs have veterans. At least half of them do. That means only about 1/4 of teams have project QBs on the active roster.

Look at Pittsburgh. They dropped the kid from Oregon and kept old ass Charlie Batch and Leftwich. Would Chase Daniel be in New Orleans if Mark Brunnell was 5 years younger? The Pats won two superbowls with Flutie and Huard. I guess my point is that most teams that have a project QB are doing so because they have to.

KC is a good team and they are not in a position to need a project QB. Stanzi can sit on the practice squad and work his ass off and maybe one day he will get one more chance.

If Cassel or Quinn don't work out, they will address QB next year. If we get down to our 3rd stringer this year, we are ****ed.