ChiefsPlanet
Page 38 of 124 « First 2834353637 38 394041424888 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs ***Official 2014 Training Camp/Preseason Mega-thread*** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=285137)

RealSNR 07-26-2014 10:06 AM
Andrew Luck

Tony Romo

Matthew Stafford

milkman 07-26-2014 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10768212)
Wilson and Kap averaging 217 yards a game tell you to STFU.
I don't know that Kapernick will ever win a SB.

I just don't think he's good enough in the pocket, and I just haven't seen any real development there.

Russel Wilson, however, makes plays game in and game out, through the course of games, to keep the chains moving.

That, to me, is what separates Wilson from Smith, and except latter half of last season, and is the proof I need to see.

I do think that there's potential.
He did show that last year.

milkman 07-26-2014 10:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10768217)
Hey you old ****er, I am talking about current QB's not guys you watched during middle age.
You didn't specify that.

Deberg_1990 07-26-2014 10:08 AM
Manziel on the field for the first time today.

Let the ESPN and NFL Network slob fest
begin!

Marcellus 07-26-2014 10:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10768220)
Andrew Luck

Tony Romo

Matthew Stafford
I really like Luck but he hasn't proven anything yet except potential. He hasn't and to say different is silly. Is he likely going to be badass? Yea, but he hasn't proven that yet. Could happen this year.

And I literally LOL at the other 2.

Stafford has beat what 3 teams with a winning record in his career?

Romo has proven he kicks ass at getting to .500.

milkman 07-26-2014 10:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10768218)
False.
If you believe that, then you're a bigger ****ing moron than I already believed.

Deberg_1990 07-26-2014 10:11 AM
Johnny Manziel takes a dump live!

Just seconds away on NFL network

KChiefs1 07-26-2014 10:13 AM
Is the NFL Network going to cover the Chiefs like this?

Marcellus 07-26-2014 10:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10768227)
If you believe that, then you're a bigger ****ing moron than I already believed.
Really. If making the playoffs 9 out of 11 years and winning your division regularly and having the #1 seed several times isn't contending then 90% of teams who take the field arent contenders.

Ask yourself this, when we lost in 1995 and 1997 in the playoffs, did you expect to lose going into those games or did you think we would likely win? Did you feel liek we had a legit shit at a SB? I bet you did.

Shit doesn't always work out but you have to win to contend and if you win a hell of a lot, you are a CONTENDER.

O.city 07-26-2014 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10768226)
I really like Luck but he hasn't proven anything yet except potential. He hasn't and to say different is silly. Is he likely going to be badass? Yea, but he hasn't proven that yet. Could happen this year.

And I literally LOL at the other 2.

Stafford has beat what 3 teams with a winning record in his career?

Romo has proven he kicks ass at getting to .500.
Luck hasn't proven anything yet?

You keep using wins and losses to justify QB play, by doing that, you're missing the big picture

O.city 07-26-2014 10:19 AM
When you play the way the chiefs did in the 90's, the margin for winning a single game in a single elimination playoff becomes so slim it's tough. Defense and strong running game are great ways to win games, sure.

But when it comes down to a single game, teams like that require to much to go right that it becomes tougher. Add to that we never had an explosive offense, it just adds to it.

milkman 07-26-2014 10:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10768232)
Really. If making the playoffs 9 out of 11 years and winning your division regularly and having the #1 seed several times isn't contending then 90% of teams who take the field arent contenders.

Ask yourself this, when we lost in 1995 and 1997 in the playoffs, did you expect to lose going into those games or did you think we would likely win? Did you feel liek we had a legit shit at a SB? I bet you did.

Shit doesn't always work out but you have to win to contend and if you win a hell of a lot, you are a CONTENDER.
With Bono and GrBac?

Hell no, I didn't think we could win.

No one.

I mean no other person has been banging the QB drum longer than me.

ChiefsCountry 07-26-2014 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10768203)
The Chiefs won a lot opf games during the 90s.
They never really contended for championships.
And the only time we did contend was when we had a Quarterback. Funny how that works out.

Marcellus 07-26-2014 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10768233)
Luck hasn't proven anything yet?

You keep using wins and losses to justify QB play, by doing that, you're missing the big picture

Here is the list of QB's by yards last year. Look this over and let me know the correlation between throwing for 4000 yards and winning.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/pl...t/passingYards

O.city 07-26-2014 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10768238)
With Bono and GrBac?

Hell no, I didn't think we could win.

No one.

I mean no other person has been banging the QB drum longer than me.
Luckily I think smith is neither if those two, so we've got that going for us.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.
Page 38 of 124 « First 2834353637 38 394041424888 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.