ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals 2010 Kansas City Royals Repository thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=221199)

alnorth 12-09-2010 08:47 AM

Most of the rule V draft is now complete.

In the MLB phase, the Royals took Nathan Adcock from the Pirates. Very young player, 22 years old, he finished last season in advanced single-A. He struggled as a starter his first 2 years, but had a breakout season last year with a 3.38 ERA, 113 K, 38 BB, ~3 K/BB, 0.5 HR/9, 1.196 WHIP.

There is no way in hell this kid is ready to start in the majors, but the Royals probably think they can hide him in the bullpen all year, then I assume send him back down to the high minors to see if his future is as a starter or relief.

The Royals lost no one in the MLB phase.

In the AAA phase, the Royals took Heath Rollins from Tampa Bay and lost Rowdy Hardy. Its not hard to keep a kid in AAA all year, so Hardy is basically gone, which is fine because he was a very marginal prospect.

Rollins is a AAA relief pitcher who has been throwing about a 4-5 ERA, and his K/BB ratio is not good. He has bounced around the minors for 5 years, and his stats have never been remotely good enough to break through to the majors. Not sure what the Royals see in him, but what the hell, its just a AAA spot.

eazyb81 12-09-2010 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7242013)
You might be correct that Cabrera could still become something, and I hope this is the case. Regarding Maier, the kid has never truly been given an opportunity. Even last year, in what everyone knew was going to be a pointless season, he didn't always get consistent ABs. He was a part-time player (300+ ABs and on the field about 50% of the time).

He's mediocre and always has been. Do we really need to see a 600 AB season for him at 29 years old to conclude that he's not that good?

And don't get me wrong, I'm not expecting an All Star game appearance for Cabrera this season. But I think his upside and ability to play all three OF positions makes him demonstrably better than Maier.

eazyb81 12-09-2010 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7242034)
Most of the rule V draft is now complete.

In the MLB phase, the Royals took Nathan Adcock from the Pirates. Very, very young player, 22 years old, he finished last season in advanced single-A. He struggled as a starter his first 2 years, but had a breakout season last year with a 3.38 ERA, 113 K, 38 BB, ~3 K/BB, 0.5 HR/9, 1.196 WHIP.

There is no way in hell this kid is ready to start in the majors, but the Royals probably think they can hide him in the bullpen all year, then I assume send him back down to the high minors to see if his future is as a starter or relief.

I bet we'll try to work out a deal with Pittsburgh to keep him and send him to the minors for cash.

siberian khatru 12-09-2010 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 7241977)
Not necessarily directing this at you, but I'm amazed at the dedication of Royals fans to continually overrate Mitch Maier. Dude will be 29 years old next year and has never had a season with a WAR greater than 0.8. He's not good at anything and he has no upside remaining. If the Royals released him today his MLB career would be over.

Cabrera had a 2 WAR season in 2009 and will only be 26 next year. He's not Carl Crawford but he has a lot more upside left in the tank than Maier.

I'm not overrating Maier (that's DeezNutz's job :D ). In my mind he's a 4th or 5th OF.

As for WAR, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that affected by playing time? So you're comparing Melky's 500+ at bats a year to Maier's 400.

I look at the percentages and I see similar players -- nearly identical OBP, and Cabrera has a small edge in power. But that's very relative, considering that Melky doesn't really have much power. It's like saying Maier has more power than Blanco.

Furthermore, given the most at-bats he's had so far, Maier last year put up an OPS+ of 94, which is right in line with Melky's career bests of 93 and 95.

If you want to argue that Melky is better than Maier, fine. But my response is: Shrug. So what? It's marginal. I don't see much upside in a guy who's spent 5 full seasons in the bigs doing the same thing year after year. Sure, he COULD break out. If you throw enough shit against the wall, something is bound to stick at some point.

So in that sense, I'll fall back to my original position: I don't see this as a move that hurts the Royals, I just don't see it helping. I see it as redundant. And I'll reiterate, it's not because I value Maier, it's because I just don't see much in Melky.

DeezNutz 12-09-2010 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 7242037)
He's mediocre and always has been. Do we really need to see a 600 AB season for him at 29 years old to conclude that he's not that good?

Given his performance in CF, I think he would offer the club above-average defense in RF and adequate (though definitely well below expectations for a corner outfielder) production at the plate.

In short, I think he'd be better than Frenchy.

Edit: And I agree with siberian. DM seems to go out of his way to find players who replicate what we already have (or in some cases, Kendall, are worse).

siberian khatru 12-09-2010 09:02 AM

From Royals Review:

http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/8417/daytmoorequis.png

CHENZ A! 12-09-2010 09:06 AM

Maier is pretty ****ing bad. I'd rather we had Emil back, than any of our current OF's.
Posted via Mobile Device

DJ's left nut 12-09-2010 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 7241820)
Gordon has to be on the move

We'll give you Brendan Ryan for him....

ChiTown 12-09-2010 09:50 AM

I'm with sk on this one.

I don't have a major problem with either signing. I just don't get why we need either one of those two. We have plenty of crappy OF's in our system already. Why sign two more of the same shit? Seriously, Moore looks completely reeruned as it relates to FA acquisitions. For the most part, I have no issue with his drafting or development of prospects. However, he has been absolutely abysmal at Free Agency.

DJ's left nut 12-09-2010 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7242013)
You might be correct that Cabrera could still become something, and I hope this is the case. Regarding Maier, the kid has never truly been given an opportunity. Even last year, in what everyone knew was going to be a pointless season, he didn't always get consistent ABs. He was a part-time player (300+ ABs and on the field about 50% of the time).

What has he done in his minor league career to warrant a full-time starting job?

You say he hasn't gotten a shot, but look at his track record. The guy has gotten far more ABs and a far stronger shot at a job than most anyone I can think of with as mediocre a minor league career as he's had.

And with that pedigree, he needed to go out there and sieze his opportunities. He hasn't done that. He's been the same middling player that he's always been. If the guy is playing to his projections in limited use, and those projections aren't very good, why does he deserve greater exposure?

Maier got a shot. He got a far better shot than most will ever get and he simply didn't do anything with it.

Melky's a more talented player. He's younger and he has a far better track record. Like it or not, your OF is much improved over where it was 36 hours ago. And even if both Frenchy and Melky suck, you're not out anything other than the chance to throw another 300 ABs at a guy that's both older and less accomplished than either of those players.

Eazyb is right - if Maier is released by the Royals, he'll never get another ML at bat.

KevB 12-09-2010 10:31 AM

What's it hurt to sign a couple of 26 year olds who have had some major league success to one year deals? Maybe one of them turns into Carlos Pena, as someone mentioned earlier. These aren't "losing" free agent moves. I like both of these better than Matt Diaz for 2 years at $8M. There isn't much out there in the bargain bin; we signed two 26 year olds with some semblance of upside for one year. If neither work out, no big deal, move on to the prospects in our system.

Demonpenz 12-09-2010 11:39 AM

I guess the Meche disaster means that we are back to signing the chuch knoblochs of the world

alnorth 12-09-2010 11:50 AM

rule V draft is done. We did not select anyone else other than those two pitchers this morning. In the AAA phase we also lost a pitcher I never heard of (Starling De La Rosa) to Texas.

doomy3 12-09-2010 03:11 PM

Zack Greinke-S- Royals Dec. 9 - 3:57 pm et


Jon Heyman of SI.com reports that the Royals are trying to involve the Yankees in talks for Zack Greinke.
Meanwhile, the Yankees are hesitant to risk having him in New York City. Greinke has struggled with anxiety issues in the past and had the Yankees on his no-trade list this past season. According to Heyman, the Rangers, Brewers, Nationals, Dodgers and Blue Jays are currently "deep in the mix" for the ace-right-hander.
Source: Jon Heyman on Twitter
Related: Yankees

alnorth 12-09-2010 03:28 PM

If true, we obviously covet Jesus Montero (the Yankees 5-star catching prospect)

DeezNutz 12-09-2010 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7243040)
If true, we obviously covet Jesus Montero (the Yankees 5-star catching prospect)

If the reports were true, I would have moved Soria last season for Montero and another piece or two.

eazyb81 12-09-2010 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7243040)
If true, we obviously covet Jesus Montero (the Yankees 5-star DH prospect)

FYP

Honestly Montero is a great hitting prospect but I'm not sure where he fits in on our squad.

I know you mainly want to acquire top talent and let it all work out but I'm not sure that is the best strategy considering how advanced our top hitting prospects are.

siberian khatru 12-09-2010 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7243040)
If true, we obviously covet Jesus Montero (the Yankees 5-star catching prospect)

Assuming he stays at C. The Yankees are talking about letting him challenge for the starting job in the spring, but who knows how much of that is legit and how much might be propaganda to boost his trade value in the offseason?

His bat is supposed to be SO good, though, I ask the board: Does it matter to you? Would you acquire him just for the bat, and if he can't hack it at C just shift him to 1B/DH?

DeezNutz 12-09-2010 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 7243101)
FYP

Honestly Montero is a great hitting prospect but I'm not sure where he fits in on our squad.

I know you mainly want to acquire top talent and let it all work out but I'm not sure that is the best strategy considering how advanced our top hitting prospects are.

While they're great prospects, there is still too much unknown about all of them. Anyone going to bet on the ML success of Moose? After watching Gordon destroy AA and AAA (and with Moose's inability to walk), I'm not.

ChiefsCountry 12-09-2010 05:44 PM

Frenchy and Melky were signed pretty cheap. Hell the Royals have been trying to get Melky for sometime. Bannister and I think Reggie Sanders were offered for him at one point.

DJ's left nut 12-09-2010 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 7243107)
Assuming he stays at C. The Yankees are talking about letting him challenge for the starting job in the spring, but who knows how much of that is legit and how much might be propaganda to boost his trade value in the offseason?

His bat is supposed to be SO good, though, I ask the board: Does it matter to you? Would you acquire him just for the bat, and if he can't hack it at C just shift him to 1B/DH?

Look at what the NY hype machine has made of Derek Jeter.

Hell, look at what it made of Melky Cabrera.

It is not exclusive to their major league roster. Yankees prospects are just as hyped as their major league counterparts - remember when Ian Kennedy was so good that he couldn't be traded for Johan Santana?

Be very VERY cautious when trading for Yankee or Bosox prospects.

tk13 12-09-2010 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 7243527)
Look at what the NY hype machine has made of Derek Jeter.

Hell, look at what it made of Melky Cabrera.

It is not exclusive to their major league roster. Yankees prospects are just as hyped as their major league counterparts - remember when Ian Kennedy was so good that he couldn't be traded for Johan Santana?

Be very VERY cautious when trading for Yankee or Bosox prospects.

You didn't even mention Joba Chamberlain.

KChiefs1 12-09-2010 07:42 PM

What is the best prospect from the teams after Greinke? Drabek?

Sure-Oz 12-09-2010 07:42 PM

Hurry up and sign Lee

alnorth 12-09-2010 07:49 PM

interesting report from Jason Stark. (in his "winners and losers" section)

Quote:

3. Kansas City Royals

OK, we admit this is a premature "winners" award, because the Royals haven't actually traded Zack Greinke yet. But this week's developments put them in a better position to pull off this monster deal than they've been in at any time this winter.

On their way out of Disney World on Thursday, officials of two different teams delivered the same message: When they arrived at these meetings, they thought there was no way the Royals would trade their ace this winter. By the time they spun out the revolving door, they'd changed their minds -- and predicted it was now even "likely."

The price never changed all week. It's still going to take what one NL exec described as "five premium pieces" to make this deal happen. But the Royals were smartly treading water this week, waiting for Lee to sign. And once that happened, they knew, Greinke would represent the only difference-making starter out there for teams such as the Rangers, Nationals, Blue Jays, Marlins and others to explore.

Meanwhile, teams that spoke with the Royals believe that they're now more motivated to trade him because they recognize this is the time to strike -- when there's no real competition on the market -- and the reality has finally hit them that Greinke clearly wants out. "What can they tell him to keep him motivated -- that 'We'll be good in 2014?'" one AL exec said. "That's not going to fly. So now's the time, and I think they know it."

Sure-Oz 12-09-2010 08:05 PM

No way we should get undercut on ANY deal...id rather tell MLB to **** off and take the draft picks if we dont get an absolute killer deal

BWillie 12-09-2010 08:07 PM

I fail to see how Mitch Maier is any worse than Melky Cabrera. Milk-E has to be good because he played for the Yankees! ZOMG's!!!

alnorth 12-09-2010 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 7243630)
No way we should get undercut on ANY deal...id rather tell MLB to **** off and take the draft picks if we dont get an absolute killer deal

There's too much interest in Greinke, we've got Atlanta, Toronto, Tampa Bay, Texas, the Yankees to start. We've even apparently got offers from the Dodgers and Brewers.

There is such a barren wasteland of pitching talent available right now that Greinke's value has probably been artificially raised too high to the point where we ought to win this deal if we dont screw it up.

BWillie 12-09-2010 08:15 PM

Man, the Royals are going to suck so fucking bad next year. It's not even funny. And if we get rid of Greinke that is another 100 loss season baby.

Sure-Oz 12-09-2010 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 7243646)
Man, the Royals are going to suck so fucking bad next year. It's not even funny. And if we get rid of Greinke that is another 100 loss season baby.

Who gives a shit....the following year will make things way more interesting and zack getting traded

Sure-Oz 12-09-2010 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7243640)
There's too much interest in Greinke, we've got Atlanta, Toronto, Tampa Bay, Texas, the Yankees to start. We've even apparently got offers from the Dodgers and Brewers.

There is such a barren wasteland of pitching talent available right now that Greinke's value has probably been artificially raised too high to the point where we ought to win this deal if we dont screw it up.

Exactly...this is the highest trade value he will have as a royal

DeezNutz 12-09-2010 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7243640)
There's too much interest in Greinke, we've got Atlanta, Toronto, Tampa Bay, Texas, the Yankees to start. We've even apparently got offers from the Dodgers and Brewers.

There is such a barren wasteland of pitching talent available right now that Greinke's value has probably been artificially raised too high to the point where we ought to win this deal if we dont screw it up.

You think it's possible that we could **** this up? How?

http://www.millerparkdrunk.com/wp-co...l-756x1024.jpg

Sure-Oz 12-09-2010 08:54 PM

No way they can **** this up, it would be a fireable offense

alnorth 12-09-2010 09:08 PM

My primary fear is obviously that we'll screw this up. That fear is a *LOT* less now than it was a week ago due to the sheer interest in and perceived value of Greinke. We'll probably do well whether we know what we are doing or not because a half-dozen teams are competing for him. They probably cant play around and try to low-ball us or they may get topped by one of the other 4 or 5 teams.

My secondary fear probably doesn't really matter because like with Cassel, what the fans think is irrelevant as long as you are correct and start winning. I am afraid that when the deal is announced we'll have this pre-conceived notion of some mammoth return for Greinke and find some excuse to be disappointed, even if its a nice deal where we'd say the team trading Greinke won if we were just outside observers who weren't Royals fans.

DeezNutz 12-09-2010 09:15 PM

Assuming that the trade doesn't look absurd, I'm going to try to do my best to give DM the benefit of the doubt, even though he's been pretty damn bad at evaluating ML talent.

He's been, obviously, solid at establishing the farm system, and I'm hopeful that he'll have more success dealing with prospects.

CHENZ A! 12-09-2010 09:19 PM

There's not going to be much to motivate people to go out to the park next year.. besides beer, and women. Last year there was beer, women, and Greinke. Oh well.

Kyle DeLexus 12-09-2010 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHENZ A! (Post 7243771)
There's not going to be much to motivate people to go out to the park next year.. besides beer, and women. Last year there was beer, women, and Greinke. Oh well.

That's the truth. I haven't been to many non-Greinke games in the last couple years.

Sure-Oz 12-09-2010 09:31 PM

I assume Moose will be up by june or july

duncan_idaho 12-09-2010 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHENZ A! (Post 7243771)
There's not going to be much to motivate people to go out to the park next year.. besides beer, and women. Last year there was beer, women, and Greinke. Oh well.

What about ... watching the debuts of Mike Moustakas and some of the other youngsters? That's something I'm definitely excited about. I'd say Danny Duffy and maybe Montgomery and/or Dwyer also make debuts at some point.

And then there's the guys they get in return for Greinke. I'd guess at least a few of those guys are going to be up this year.

CHENZ A! 12-09-2010 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyle DeLexus (Post 7243788)
That's the truth. I haven't been to many non-Greinke games in the last couple years.

Greinke, or free tickets are pretty much the only time I'll go out to a weeknight game. I usually go to 10-15 games a year, but that will drop by a couple I'm sure. That said, if it's best for the team, then we have to get what we can.

Can we PLEASE just not trade Soria ever!?! Damnit, if he goes I'll be really bummed, like when callaspo was traded, but worse.

KChiefs1 12-09-2010 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 7243646)
Man, the Royals are going to suck so fucking bad next year. It's not even funny. And if we get rid of Greinke that is another 100 loss season baby.

Look on the bright side:
Which means the Royals will have the top pick in the draft in 2012...more talent on the way!

Sure-Oz 12-09-2010 09:38 PM

I only went to 2 games last year, lowest total ever for me in a season.

Hammock Parties 12-09-2010 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7243640)
There's too much interest in Greinke, we've got Atlanta, Toronto, Tampa Bay, Texas, the Yankees to start. We've even apparently got offers from the Dodgers and Brewers.

There is such a barren wasteland of pitching talent available right now that Greinke's value has probably been artificially raised too high to the point where we ought to win this deal if we dont screw it up.

and he's not that old. i feel this would be the best time for any other team to get him. He's still got at least 7 more good years left in him, possibly more because his delivery doesnt throw a lot of torque on his body like tim lincecum(i probably spelled that wrong)

Don't get me wrong, I will probably shed a tear if we trade him away, but if we get super badass talent for him, then do it. out of all the players we've traded away, greinke by far would be the best we've traded

DeezNutz 12-09-2010 09:44 PM

For me, one of the bright spots is that we're not going to be trading him because we can't afford him.

Sadly, this is progress.

Kyle DeLexus 12-09-2010 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 7243812)
I only went to 2 games last year, lowest total ever for me in a season.

Same for me. I'm normally a ~20 games a year guy, but the last few years I just haven't went out when Zack wasn't pitching and even last year I just didn't go watch much. I'll go to check out some of the prospects when they are called up this year though.

alnorth 12-09-2010 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7243820)
For me, one of the bright spots is that we're not going to be trading him because we can't afford him.

Sadly, this is progress.

no kidding. If Greinke returned to Cy Young form and wanted to stay, I have no doubt we would have eventually handed him a massive contract.

I know that in a perfect world we'd have 100% revenue sharing and a salary cap, but things HAVE improved dramatically from the 90's and early 2000's. The Royals are now getting something north of 30 million in revenue sharing every year. Sure the new stadium helps, but this enhanced revenue sharing is the primary reason why the Forbes valuation of the team has almost quadrupled since David Glass bought the Royals (this has got to be the best investment he has made in his life. He may not be getting much of a dividend, but he'll be paid if he ever sells)

We used to have a payroll 8 or 9 times less than the top 2 or 3 teams, now they are merely double or triple, and we're pretty close to league average payroll. Heck, even the Rangers spent a lot less money than us last year.

CHENZ A! 12-09-2010 10:16 PM

I sincerely appreciate the optimism of some of you guys.

siberian khatru 12-09-2010 10:19 PM

LMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAO

First, the four worst hitters hitters (by wOBA) among qualified players from 2008-2010.

127. Pedro Feliz, .284 wOBA
126. Jason Kendall, .288 wOBA
125. Yuniesky Betancourt, .291 wOBA
124. Jeff Francoeur, .298 wOBA

Now, the least valuable three (qualified) position players by FanGraphs WAR, 2008-2010:

127. Jose Guillen, -1.1 WAR
126. Yuniesky Betancourt, -0.8 WAR
125. Jeff Francoeur, 0.0 WAR

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index...-contest-over/

DeezNutz 12-09-2010 10:39 PM

Mother****. Did we just acquire Pedro Feliz?

Oh, but Frenchy has upside!! Laughable. Same with Melky. The only reason why we're not the laughingstock of baseball is because the contracts are minimal in terms of dollars and years. But make no mistake, our outfield is not improved. Stagnant? Perhaps. Improved? Not even ****ing close.

alnorth 12-09-2010 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7243927)
Mother****. Did we just acquire Pedro Feliz?

No. They had to go 4 places instead of 3 since the bottom was not a royal

duncan_idaho 12-09-2010 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7243927)
Mother****. Did we just acquire Pedro Feliz?

Oh, but Frenchy has upside!! Laughable. Same with Melky. The only reason why we're not the laughingstock of baseball is because the contracts are minimal in terms of dollars and years. But make no mistake, our outfield is not improved. Stagnant? Perhaps. Improved? Not even ****ing close.

Anything that gets Mitch Meier's worthless ass out of the lineup is an improvement.

Francouer and Cabrera are exactly the type of guys you take fliers on. Rays fans hated obtaining Carlos Pena at the time of that deal. He was of a similar age and pedigree to Francouer and Cabrera.

BWillie 12-10-2010 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 7243812)
I only went to 2 games last year, lowest total ever for me in a season.

I went to three, I paid zero money to the Royals organization though this much I assure you. I make sure when I go tickets are either given to me or a friend takes me. I don't even buy a dollar hot dog. Piss on them. Put something on the field. On the bright side, buddy of mine bet me $200 that the Royals go to the playoffs before the Chiefs. This was during the Herm Edwards era. That is the one thing I thank Herm for...making this franchise appear completely hopeless.

BWillie 12-10-2010 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 7244018)
Anything that gets Mitch Meier's worthless ass out of the lineup is an improvement.

Francouer and Cabrera are exactly the type of guys you take fliers on. Rays fans hated obtaining Carlos Pena at the time of that deal. He was of a similar age and pedigree to Francouer and Cabrera.

All that is fine and dandy but Pena can at least hit home runs and get on base a little bit. Mitch Meier isn't significantly better or worse than Cabrera and Francouer. Our shit better work out for DeJesus or this is fucking stupid. DeJesus would have been cheap. He was a great guy around town...should have tried to keep him IMO.

Pitt Gorilla 12-10-2010 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 7244064)
All that is fine and dandy but Pena can at least hit home runs and get on base a little bit. Mitch Meier isn't significantly better or worse than Cabrera and Francouer. Our shit better work out for DeJesus or this is fucking stupid. DeJesus would have been cheap. He was a great guy around town...should have tried to keep him IMO.

How did Pena's OBP (prior to Tampa) compare to Melky's?

CaliforniaChief 12-10-2010 01:08 AM

Royals Baseball: Where future Yankees rise and former Yankees fall.

Deberg_1990 12-10-2010 08:28 AM

But, but..., the minors are loaded!! Just wait!

Signed, 1987, 1990, 1992, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2009

alnorth 12-10-2010 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7244325)
But, but..., the minors are loaded!! Just wait!

Signed, 1987, 1990, 1992, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2009

bullcrap. The main reason why we've sucked for 20 years is because our minors have NEVER been loaded, not since I've been paying attention in the early 90's anyway. The farm system spit out a good player every 4 or 5 years and not much else, we drafted crap either because we were stupid, we were too cheap to pay bonuses, or both.

The Royals can still screw this up, but dont pretend that this time isnt different.

PunkinDrublic 12-10-2010 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7244383)
bullcrap. The main reason why we've sucked for 20 years is because our minors have NEVER been loaded, not since I've been paying attention in the early 90's anyway. The farm system spit out a good player every 4 or 5 years and not much else, we drafted crap either because we were stupid, we were too cheap to pay bonuses, or both.

The Royals can still screw this up, but dont pretend that this time isnt different.

I just hope we don't get fleeced if we decide to trade Grienke. Down here people are pretty much resigned to the Rangers losing Cliff Lee but they don't want to give up top prospects to get Grienke. They point out last season and say he's not as good as Coby Lewis. IMO a motivated Grienke returns to Cy Young form, the dude straight up quit last year down the stretch.

alnorth 12-10-2010 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunkinDrublic (Post 7244403)
I just hope we don't get fleeced if we decide to trade Grienke. Down here people are pretty much resigned to the Rangers losing Cliff Lee but they don't want to give up top prospects to get Grienke. They point out last season and say he's not as good as Coby Lewis. IMO a motivated Grienke returns to Cy Young form, the dude straight up quit last year down the stretch.

If the Rangers get him, those fans need to be prepared for major disappointment if they think it wont take much. Greinke is being given a mulligan by other teams for last year for lack of motivation. On top of that, his value has been artificially inflated due to the unusual lack of pitching available and there are at least 5 teams who are serious.

eazyb81 12-10-2010 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunkinDrublic (Post 7244403)
I just hope we don't get fleeced if we decide to trade Grienke. Down here people are pretty much resigned to the Rangers losing Cliff Lee but they don't want to give up top prospects to get Grienke. They point out last season and say he's not as good as Coby Lewis. IMO a motivated Grienke returns to Cy Young form, the dude straight up quit last year down the stretch.

Anyone that seriously thinks Colby f'n Lewis is better than Zack Greinke is absolutely clueless about baseball.

okiedokieokoye 12-10-2010 05:25 PM

On a side note I had completely forgotten until now that we signed that 19 year old Cuban pitcher Arguelles and Jeff Bianchi was out all year with an injury. It will be great to see these youngsters do their thing in Spring Training this year.

alnorth 12-10-2010 05:55 PM

Figure I should put this up before anyone freaks, a few gullible people in the media already bit on it. Someone tweeted a fake (and ridiculous) trade using a very clever fake twitter account using a weird ascii character instead of a capital "I".

This:

Quote:

Sl_JonHeyman: #Phillies, #Royals agree in principal to trade Zack Greinke in exchange for Antonio Bastardo, Ross Gload, and 2 minor leaguers.
is not real.

no love 12-10-2010 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7245613)
Figure I should put this up before anyone freaks, a few gullible people in the media already bit on it. Someone tweeted a fake (and ridiculous) trade using a very clever fake twitter account using a weird ascii character instead of a capital "I".

This:



is not real.

awesome.

wouldn't surprise me, well, it would... but not really.

Reaper16 12-10-2010 06:09 PM

LMAO@ Ross Gload

Demonpenz 12-10-2010 10:27 PM

Gload Reminded me alot of ichiro...Ichigload

Pitt Gorilla 12-10-2010 11:26 PM

Anyone who believed that should get out of the profession. Good Lord.

DeezNutz 12-10-2010 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 7246003)
Anyone who believed that should get out of the profession. Good Lord.

You are seriously misinformed because we could have won a shit ton of games with 53 Ross Gloads.

alnorth 12-11-2010 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7246006)
You are seriously misinformed because we could have won a shit ton of games with 53 Ross Gloads.

yeah, but can gload pitch? I doubt it.

okiedokieokoye 12-11-2010 01:19 AM

Locked and Gloaded

alnorth 12-11-2010 05:29 PM

Sounds like Greinke wont have to worry about converting Canadian dollars to American dollars.

Quote:

Buster_ESPN: Heard this: The Blue Jays are not close on a Zack Greinke deal, and have no intention of giving up Kyle Drabek and Travis Snider for him.

KC_Connection 12-11-2010 05:40 PM

Good, that would be a terrible deal for them. I don't see any reason to trade Travis Snider at this point.

And I'm not even sure why Greinke would want to play for the Jays next year...they are a 85 win team in a division where you need at least 95 wins.

alnorth 12-11-2010 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 7247334)
Good, that would be a terrible deal for them. I don't see any reason to trade Travis Snider at this point.

And I'm not even sure why Greinke would want to play for the Jays next year...they are a 85 win team in a division where you need at least 95 wins.

There is very good reason to believe that this will be a down year for the AL East. If the Blue Jays EVER want to make a run at the division, they arguably have to go for it now.

KC_Connection 12-11-2010 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7247359)
There is very good reason to believe that this will be a down year for the AL East. If the Blue Jays EVER want to make a run at the division, they arguably have to go for it now.

A down year, haha? What makes you think the Yankees and Red Sox aren't going to win 95+ games next year?

The Jays need to go for it when their top prospects are in their primes and when the wealthiest ownership in baseball is prepared to put money into the team, and neither of those things will happen before next season. Considering they just traded one of their best pitchers for a 20 year old prospect, contending in 2011 obviously isn't in the plans.

KC_Connection 12-11-2010 05:59 PM

Also, how exactly is Greinke's presence supposed to turn a 85 win team into a 95 win team? Talk about your futile trades.

alnorth 12-11-2010 06:07 PM

If the Blue Jays do nothing, they likely hand the division over to the Red Sox, but this is a winnable division. I dispute the argument that the AL East will obviously require 95 wins next year. Maybe it will, but its not obvious, and Greinke can certainly turn them into a 90-win team. Once you are there, a little bit of luck to slightly outperform your pythag is all you need.

The reason why Tampa Bay will fall back is obvious. The Yankee lineup is getting seriously old at this point, and Petitte will likely retire. If the Blue Jays dont think they can match the Red Sox, thats fine but I would be pissed as a Blue Jay fan. It makes sense for the Royals to hoard their prospects and not care about 2011, but when you do get within striking distance you have to go for it.

As the old saying goes, "prospects are nice, but flags fly forever."

KC_Connection 12-11-2010 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7247394)
If the Blue Jays do nothing, they likely hand the division over to the Red Sox, but this is a winnable division. I dispute the argument that the AL East will obviously require 95 wins next year. Maybe it will, but its not obvious, and Greinke can certainly turn them into a 90-win team. Once you are there, a little bit of luck to slightly outperform your pythag is all you need.

It's required 95+ wins every year for the past decade. That isn't going to change in a year where Boston just loaded up with Gonzalez and Crawford and the Yankees being the Yankees.

Toronto's team just isn't built to contend right now in the way that those teams are. It makes far more sense for Greinke to go somewhere that can actually benefit from his presence in 2011 like Texas.

Quote:

The reason why Tampa Bay will fall back is obvious. The Yankee lineup is getting seriously old at this point, and Petitte will likely retire. If the Blue Jays dont think they can match the Red Sox, thats fine but I would be pissed as a Blue Jay fan. It makes sense for the Royals to hoard their prospects and not care about 2011, but when you do get within striking distance you have to go for it.
If the Jays had any intention of spending money and contending, they would have simply kept Halladay, Rios, and Rolen in 2010 and built around them. But they don't. They are fine with waiting in mediocrity while making a steady profit.

And I'm always pissed as a Jays fan, but I resided myself that Rogers isn't prepared to seriously contend for a while. The Marcum deal should be a sign that the window for contention is more like 2013 and beyond.

DeezNutz 12-11-2010 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 7247334)
Good, that would be a terrible deal for them. I don't see any reason to trade Travis Snider at this point.

And I'm not even sure why Greinke would want to play for the Jays next year...they are a 85 win team in a division where you need at least 95 wins.

2.0 and -1.0

Me thinks you're overvaluing Snider a bit. If you could get Greinke for Drabek and Snider, the only people who should be pissed are Royals fans.

"the window for contention is more like 2013 and beyond"?

Didn't know you were a Royals fan, too. Welcome aboard.

KC_Connection 12-11-2010 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7247407)
2.0 and -1.0

Me thinks you're overvaluing Snider a bit. If you could get Greinke for Drabek and Snider, the only people who should be pissed are Royals fans.

And I think you are underrating Snider and overrating Greinke. Funny how that works, eh?


Quote:

Didn't know you were a Royals fan, too. Welcome aboard.
Jays fans should always have less hope than Royals fans, simply because of the division they are in.

DeezNutz 12-11-2010 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 7247431)
And I think you are underrating Snider and overrating Greinke. Funny how that works, eh?

And the numbers support the inversion. Wait.

KC_Connection 12-11-2010 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7247435)
And the numbers support that type of inversion. Wait.

They do. Greinke's 2009 season looks entirely like an aberration and Snider is undoubtedly one of the top young outfielders in baseball. What would possibly compel the Jays to trade someone like that for a pitcher (something they already have in incredible excess)?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.