ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Pats fans can blame me (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=240408)

tk13 01-16-2011 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7362772)
I've argued that Brady has made more clutch plays in the playoffs through the years than Manning has, and that is still true.

I've also said over the last two or three years that Brady has bought into his own hype, and rather than take what the defense gives him, he tries to make the big plays to live up to that hype.
The result is that he hasn't been clutch in the last three playoffs.

The best, most consistent clutch performers are the ones that play within themselves.

I think the real interesting question that's about to set up... say Roethlisberger gets to the Super Bowl again, does he pass Brady as the best QB in the NFL today...

Hootie 01-16-2011 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7362781)
How is a player "clutch"? A player can't out perform his best skill in key moments.

Vinatieri is the VERY DEFINITION of the term "clutch player"...

It's easy for a kicker to be clutch...or a basketball player...or even a baseball player

a QB? a RB? a WR? A defensive player? Meh. Not so much...because EVERYONE has to be working as a team in football...every player has to be at the right spot...and every call has to be the right call...or you're ****ed.

Michael Jordan was clutch almost every single time. He was clutch. CLUTCH CLUTCH CLUTCH.

we've seen Brady and Manning both be clutch...and both be total stiffs...

so how can you consider someone like that clutch?

you can't

football is too much of a team sport to have clutch performers...overused term

was Big Ben clutch because he threw a ball as far as he could and a rookie receiver made a catch? Sure...I guess...I'm not quite sure why the Ravens weren't covering that...

but damn

I'd say he was lucky, not clutch.

milkman 01-16-2011 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 7362790)
I think the real interesting question that's about to set up... say Roethlisberger gets to the Super Bowl again, does he pass Brady as the best QB in the NFL today...

It depends on how the SB plays out if it's Roethliberger and Rodgers.

If the Pack win it, then I think we start seeing a debate between the two of them.

KurtCobain 01-16-2011 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7362787)
who on this site is my partner in crime?

name one person, please

name one person I'm "buddy/buddy" with...

this is the dumbest post I've ever read...I always stick to my opinion...I don't care if the majority agree with me, the minority agrees with me, or no one agrees with me...

you're and idiot

$1000 (already lost enough today what's another G) says you have tons of rep from the same few members because you all rep whore each other...

bet?

??

and I'M the pathetic one looking for board "acceptance"

give me a break

I just think it's interesting how quickly you notice the rep comments you get. And how much you insist on referencing to the system. I use it mainly for messaging now because it's convenient. But if you wanna bring up with the 'people feel sorry for me' thing, I've had ten times the neg rep since I've been back on the planet than I did before.

Hootie 01-16-2011 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7362788)
It doesn't matter whether you believe it.

Everyone else did, and he was hyped.

He bought into it.

On a side note, everyone else in the world believed he was clutch, but we all now know that we were wrong, because Hootie is here to set us straight.

I don't think clutch exists in a team sport like football...

maybe there are clutch coordinators or playcallers

KurtCobain 01-16-2011 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7362799)
I don't think clutch exists in a team sport like football...

maybe there are clutch coordinators or playcallers

That's ****ing stupid. There's players that play better when they need to and won't let you down, then there's ****ing chokers.

Hootie 01-16-2011 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bill clinton's spleen (Post 7362801)
That's ****ing stupid. There's players that play better when they need to and won't let you down, then there's ****ing chokers.

so who is clutch and who is a choker in today's NFL?

please

I'd like to know

Rams Fan 01-16-2011 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7362796)
Vinatieri is the VERY DEFINITION of the term "clutch player"...

It's easy for a kicker to be clutch...or a basketball player...or even a baseball player

a QB? a RB? a WR? A defensive player? Meh. Not so much...because EVERYONE has to be working as a team in football...every player has to be at the right spot...and every call has to be the right call...or you're ****ed.

Michael Jordan was clutch almost every single time. He was clutch. CLUTCH CLUTCH CLUTCH.

we've seen Brady and Manning both be clutch...and both be total stiffs...

so how can you consider someone like that clutch?

you can't

football is too much of a team sport to have clutch performers...overused term

was Big Ben clutch because he threw a ball as far as he could and a rookie receiver made a catch? Sure...I guess...I'm not quite sure why the Ravens weren't covering that...

but damn

I'd say he was lucky, not clutch.

I like to think there are players that can perform at their best in key moments of the game, but can't out perform what they've already accomplished. Or, say a player goes on a hot streak in the playoffs, would you consider that player clutch? Or just playing at the highest level he possibly could in the playoffs(Example:Cody Ross)?

Phobia 01-16-2011 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7362685)
I would have taken a shotgun to the face if someone told me to before the game...that's how confident I was in the Patriots.

Man, we all had a little Hootie luck of our own not taking some of that action.

Hootie 01-16-2011 10:22 PM

Manning was a choker according to some when they lost to the Jets last week...

So why isn't Brady a choker today?

(IMO, both QB's played ok enough...both defenses let their teams down)

milkman 01-16-2011 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7362799)
I don't think clutch exists in a team sport like football...

maybe there are clutch coordinators or playcallers

Clearly, in a team sport, other players have to step up and make plays.

But in football, on the field, it all starts with the QB.

The ones that step up consistently and make critical plays are clutch.

Hootie 01-16-2011 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7362805)
I like to think there are players that can perform at their best in key moments of the game, but can't out perform what they've already accomplished. Or, say a player goes on a hot streak in the playoffs, would you consider that player clutch? Or just playing at the highest level he possibly could in the playoffs(Example:Cody Ross)?

I'm not sure...

I think players can certainly be chokers...but it's more evident in a sport like basketball or baseball.

Football is a different beast...it's too precise...and you have to depend on 11 guys being on the same page at all times...

when the Colts lost and Manning threw his line under the bus...you don't think they deserved to be under the bus?

The whole idea I've argued about for years and years and years is Brady has never been more clutch than Manning...

He was "clutch" in 1 Super Bowl game (the Panthers game) when both defenses were just in shootout mode (and it still took a CLUTCH field goal to win)...

Both QB's are great...and both have and will continue to only go as far as the rest of their team takes them...

Not even the Michael Jordan of QB's could have won with the Pats defense this week...or the Colts defense last week...

Football is too team orientated...

and I think it's time to stop always blaming the QB every time a team loses...

it wasn't Brady's fault this week, it wasn't Manning's fault the week before, and it wasn't Cassel's (not all of it at least) fault when we lost...

I'm just astonished that the Jets put their money where their mouth was...I didn't see them beating Indy (although I thought it was possible)...they did. I didn't see them beating New England (and I thought it wasn't possible)...they did.

Props to them. No more Jets bashing. They proved me totally wrong...oh well. Time for me to move on and stop speaking in absolutes. I learn from my mistakes.

Bambi 01-16-2011 10:30 PM

Hollywood loves the Jets, all the golden globe girls were in green

lol

Marcellus 01-16-2011 10:31 PM

It's obvious the Sanchez is better than Brady right?

Hootie 01-16-2011 10:31 PM

well hey

and this is because I can

brady shouldn't get any credit

he was a SUPERSTAR CLUTCH QB who never put up the numbers but always won in the postseason during their spygate dynasty

now he's a SUPERSTAR REGULAR SEASON QB A LA PEYTON MANNING who keeps losing at home in the playoffs after their spygate dynasty

so uh...

???

time for us to start taking a longer look at this spygate and taking away these Super Bowls from their franchise for being such cheaters (oh wait, we can't, Goodell destroyed all of the damning evidence to protect the game's integrity)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.