jcroft |
11-15-2004 03:52 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief
There's nothing hardass about it. I just think that career criminals are nothing but a cancer to society. It's magnified by the fact that people actually looked up to this piece of sh*t because of his success. Rather than his talent excusing his actions, I think it just magnifies what a waste of skin he was. At least the common criminal is poor and desperate. He had the talent to rise above the gutter, but instead he chose to continue to exist there aided by his financial prosperity. He wasn't a thug out of neccessity, he was thug by choice.
I'm actually suprised that people think artistic talent is reason enough to excuse repetitive criminal behaviour. Would you want a thug like that in your neighborhood? Maybe he could serenade your kids to sleep with his musical talents, while he sells them drugs and steals from you.
|
For the record, I don't really object to your point of view, I just don't agree with it. You are certainly not the only person who thinks that career criminals should die, and it's a perfectly respectable opinion -- I just don't agree, that's all.
And for the record, I don't think his music AT ALL excuses the stuff he did. I just think that sometimes you have to seperate the art from the artist (see Dixie Chicks, Mozart, etc, etc.).
|