ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   A Question for all that want DE with 1st pick (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=107091)

Coogs 12-23-2004 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj
IMO, right after the bowl games is the best time to settle on a player. After that time too much emphasis is put on combine numbers and inflated workout numbers and fake numbers being thrown about.

:thumb: No doubt!

htismaqe 12-23-2004 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs
So if an Ed Reed type is available when we pick, you would prefer we passed?

NO

As far as I'm concerned, NO position on defense should be exempt...

Coogs 12-23-2004 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
NO

As far as I'm concerned, NO position on defense should be exempt...

My toughts exactly. Except for maybe a DT. I might frown a bit if we select another DT early.

htismaqe 12-23-2004 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar Chief
You guys are gonna shit bricks when we take an Offensive Left Tackle with the first pick.
ROFL

Not me.

Depending on what we do in free agency, it might not be a bad idea at all.

Saulbadguy 12-23-2004 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho
I don't really know what that means. Is there some adjustment I can make on my computer to shrink your sig? Right now it is excessively wide.

Check the resolution you are running at. Right click on your desktop, properties, settings.

Spicy McHaggis 12-23-2004 03:11 PM

Luckily for the Chiefs we have so many needs taking the best defensive player on the board at the time isn't a bad idea. The FO should definately be open to the possibility of trading up though. Hopefully somewhere in the bevy of picks that we have Carl will stumble upon another Jared Allen. Defensive Rookie of the Year IMO.

ChiefsCountry 12-23-2004 03:27 PM

I think our draft needs are as followed:
DE
WR
OT

Draft is for future, helping out right away is a bonus. Our OL is getting old at tackle. OL would be a good choice. I think we get a MLB and #1 CB and Nickelback in free agency, our defense will be fine with a lineup of:
DE Allen
DT Sims
DT Dalton
DE Hicks
LB Fujitia
LB FA
LB Barber
CB FA
CB Warfield
SS Wesley
FS Woods

tk13 12-23-2004 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy
Check the resolution you are running at. Right click on your desktop, properties, settings.

Yeah, that's it, instead of shrinking your signature you want to make everybody change their resolution. Jerk. :)

Kclee 12-23-2004 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13
Yeah, that's it, instead of shrinking your signature you want to make everybody change their resolution. Jerk. :)

ROFL Well, he is Saulbadguy.

Cannibal 12-23-2004 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC_Chief
RDE is where they want us to go. Replace Hicks with a more aggressive pass-rusher.

Heck, we could have done that THIS year... instead of resigning Hicks we could have kept Truluck.

ITA.

We need to draft a stud pass rusher and then try to sign a decent FA corner and draft a LB in 2nd. (If there any good pass rushers at our spot in the draft.)

Drafting a corner would be a bad idea IMO. I don't care how good they are in college, they will struggle at this level for a year or two at least. After next year the window slams shut.

warpaint99 12-23-2004 04:03 PM

Pollack or Erasumus from wisconsin ?

The Boston College guys stock may be moving up.

Cannibal 12-23-2004 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warpaint99
Pollack or Erasumus from wisconsin ?

The Boston College guys stock may be moving up.

Do you think any of them are capable of 10 sacks in their rookie year?

Saulbadguy 12-23-2004 04:08 PM

Why should we draft another pass rusher? We already have one, IMO. I don't want a rookie on one end, and a 2nd year veteran on the other.

Cannibal 12-23-2004 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy
Why should we draft another pass rusher? We already have one, IMO. I don't want a rookie on one end, and a 2nd year veteran on the other.

Because it is one of the positions in which a rookie (if he is talented) can step right in and contribute immediately, which is what we need. Plus, if you can generate a very good pass rush from both end positions, it allows you blitz less often which allows you to cover the field better, which makes you a better D.

Saulbadguy 12-23-2004 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannibal
Because it the one of the positions in which a rookie (if he is talented) can step right in and contribute immediately, which is what we need. Plus, if you can genate a very good pass rush from both end positions, it allows you blitz less often which allows you to cover the field better, which makes you a better D.

True, but so can a LB or CB. We have a "pass rushing DE" in Jared Allen. I believe having him will open up more opportunties for our DT's and the other DE to get more pressure on the QB. Hell, its already happening. The last few games i've been watching, our D-Line is performing fairly well, and they are getting pressure.

Our LB's however..when they are sent on a blitz, they don't do shit. They get caught up behind our D-line, or just get blocked out. Our LB's totally suck.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.