ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   FBI MOSTED WANTED!!!! (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=146510)

redbrian 08-29-2006 02:20 PM

Leave the molestation charges out of this and it’s nobody’s business but the adults as to how many wives (or husbands) they have.

If it’s ok for gay’s to be legally married it should be hunky dory for polygamist to be married (at least they can procreate).



Note: Tongue firmly planted in cheek (sort of).

Jilly 08-29-2006 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
You better pass that idea past your current fiance or husband first-he might not like the idea of 79 other guys in the same bed-lol

I don't know..he might need a pinch hitter every now and then

Pitt Gorilla 08-29-2006 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redbrian

If it’s ok for gay’s...



Note: Tongue firmly planted in cheek (sort of).

Dude. NTTAWWT.

vailpass 08-29-2006 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UTChief
Mainstreem Mormans are not trying to reinstate this practice this is false the ony thing in this article that is true is the Quote from Presedent Hinckley that they are not asociated with this group.

You failed to respond to the facts in the article that indicate the close tie between the Mormon religion and polygamy. Why hasn't section 132 been removed from the Mormon doctrine?

And, in the interest of full disclosure I am not a Mormon.
Are you?

Halfcan 08-29-2006 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla
You've got to be kidding; molestting your own child should be punished by AT LEAST castration.

I agree-it would cut down on repeat offenders-and I mean CUT down-lol

Halfcan 08-29-2006 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jilly
I don't know..he might need a pinch hitter every now and then

LOL I am available nights and weekends. There you go, 78 left until you have your own religion. :)

Halfcan 08-29-2006 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass
You failed to respond to the facts in the article that indicate the close tie between the Mormon religion and polygamy. Why hasn't section 132 been removed from the Mormon doctrine?

And, in the interest of full disclosure I am not a Mormon.
Are you?

I'm not, but I have a lot of RLDS coming and knocking on my door-I do live in Indep. though.

UTChief 08-29-2006 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass
You failed to respond to the facts in the article that indicate the close tie between the Mormon religion and polygamy. Why hasn't section 132 been removed from the Mormon doctrine?

And, in the interest of full disclosure I am not a Mormon.
Are you?

This canot be removed because it was revation to the profet and we must understand why there was a time this was needed and there may be a time in the future that it is needed in this life or the afterlife we do not practice poligamy but we believe their was a time it was nessasary. polygamy wasnt practiced by everyone in the church. there was actually very few called to status. Those who practiced it were asked to by the leaders for reasons I brought up before. I am not as knoligable as I should be so I don't wan't to say somthing that is wrong I didn't intend to debate religion so I will leave it at that.

Adept Havelock 08-29-2006 03:15 PM

I couldn't care less about the polygamy angle except as it relates to child abuse. This waste of flesh liked to arrange and perform marriages between 13 year olds and old men. Stake him out over an ant hill, cover his nuts in honey, and let nature take it's course.

Jon Krakauers "Under the Banner of Heaven" is a pretty good write up on these child abusers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by UTChief
This canot be removed because it was revation to the profet and we must understand why there was a time this was needed and there may be a time in the future that it is needed in this life or the afterlife we do not practice poligamy but we believe their was a time it was nessasary. polygamy wasnt practiced by everyone in the church. there was actually very few called to status. Those who practiced it were asked to by the leaders for reasons I brought up befor. I am not as knoligable as I should be so I don't wan't to say somthing that is wrong I didn't intend to debate religion so I will leave it at that.

Funny how it was only "religiously necessary" right up until Utah applied for statehood, and renouncing polygamy became a condition for granting statehood.

What an astonishing and fortuitously timed religious revelation. :hmmm:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
I'm not, but I have a lot of RLDS coming and knocking on my door-I do live in Indep. though.

I'm truly sorry for you. If it helps I've found messing with the minds of evangelicals doing the door to door bit can be good for a quick laugh. Though I usually reserve that treatment for the ones who can't take a polite hint or direct statement that I'm not interested.

vailpass 08-29-2006 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UTChief
This canot be removed because it was revation to the profet and we must understand why there was a time this was needed and there may be a time in the future that it is needed in this life or the afterlife we do not practice poligamy but we believe their was a time it was nessasary. polygamy wasnt practiced by everyone in the church. there was actually very few called to status. Those who practiced it were asked to by the leaders for reasons I brought up before. I am not as knoligable as I should be so I don't wan't to say somthing that is wrong I didn't intend to debate religion so I will leave it at that.

Fair enough. Thanks for the discussion, I'll respect your wish to not enter into a religious conversation.
Cheers.

Jilly 08-29-2006 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
I'm not, but I have a lot of RLDS coming and knocking on my door-I do live in Indep. though.

I do to, but not once have they come to my door. I keep answering the door naked, just in case. Boy, that Fed Ex guy was pretty surprised...

StcChief 08-29-2006 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jilly
I do to, but not once have they come to my door. I keep answering the door naked, just in case. Boy, that Fed Ex guy was pretty surprised...

This thread is worthless without....

Never mind.
:p

Jilly 08-29-2006 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nm_dbf
This thread is worthless without....

Never mind.
:p

damn it, I knew I should have taken some. Sorry. Maybe next time.

boogblaster 08-29-2006 03:38 PM

Most extremists in any thing are sick bastards..sounds like he needs to do a little time and be a wife to 80 inmates....BOOG....

Baby Lee 08-29-2006 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
I'm not, but I have a lot of RLDS coming and knocking on my door-I do live in Indep. though.

Not in the past 5 or so years. :p


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.