![]() |
save Charles?
what are we saving him for? THE NFL IS A TODAY SPORT...not a tomorrow |
Quote:
Let's save Brandon Flowers until we have a pass rush. We wouldn't want to use him up. |
I picked up an SI in the Dr's office on Monday and the cover story was on RBs and how quickly they are burned out.
I can see both sides. With Charles, we have a bird in hand. We might as well use him while we know he's good. However, he's so dynamic that using him up now rather than sparing him so that we can get 7 years of productivity instead of 3 seems a bit foolish, especially given the fact that we aren't yet a contender. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
At best, we'd be two years away from making a legit push for a SB with a n00b, and that's if he's ****ing great from the start. Could be 3 years, most likely. And Charles might be out of the league. Use RBs when you have them because they don't last. |
Quote:
screens, passes, runs... 15-20 would be nice... |
Quote:
|
I am thinking it was more about the conditions and Jamal's habit of fumbling more than anything else.
Now this Sunday if the conditions are fine and he doesn't play then we might have problem. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think Jason is probably right with his assessment on what the deal is. |
here's my gambling advice:
go put all of your money on the Pats (-3) before the move the line up... and they will so hurry while it's still a good line |
Might as well get used to it. Whitlock is going to try and discredit any success the Chiefs have because of his bitterness toward Pioli.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I can't believe some of you people actually think this guy is a good writer.
He rewords the same stupid shit over, and over, and you eat it up. Whitlock has true fans. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.