Quote:
This one is during a rookie salary cap that will dramatically increase the value of first round picks. Palmer is coming in from retirement, not in football shape, in OCTOBER. At best, the Raiders get him for 9 weeks this year. If the Raiders play well and he hits the benchmarks, they lose TWO first round picks. If not, they still lose a first and a second. Dang. |
2 firsts for a QB who has been sitting on his ass....
does this mean he's the starter over campell next year? how's that going to go over with the team...cause if they traded a first for a half a year, it's one of the most insanely stupid trades ever... Bengals have a solid looking rookie QB and an extra first....looks to me like they raped....and meanwhile we're cycling through our 42nd backup QB since the 80's... |
Quote:
I just think it's comical that he made all those comments and then backed off. Dude's spent the last several months spouting off about principles, then ignores his own. Do the Raiders have any 2012 picks left after this? Mark's first major act as owner reminds me of that old pot PSA - "I LEARNED IT BY WATCHING YOU!" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We'll see how he pans out in Oakland...when I said that 2 years ago everyone laughed at me because no one could fathom him not being a "franchise QB" in Cincy... the Raiders are desperate...and Carson will not be the answer. Why? Because he's a downgrade from Jason Campbell. Palmer is not a good NFL QB. Period. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not saying it was his intention, but the stubbornness paid off big time. |
This has to be a joke. Two first rounders?
|
Quote:
|
We should have given then cassel for a 2nd.
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.