ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 10 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs How much would you give for Barkley or Griffin? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=253419)

Shogun 12-07-2011 08:13 PM
Well Barkley is retired, I really like Griffins post up game and I think he is going to develop into quite the perimeter player later in his career, still on the Clippers, though. I'm not sure if Charles would come back into sports let alone the NFL, what could he play? Griffin would be a great Tight end but I'm not sure what you mean. Why would we have to give draft picks for these players?

Brianfo 12-07-2011 08:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8179085)
I really really wish I could understand why Chiefs fans are so reluctant to trade one of their most valuable pieces that has the least amount of impact on a game.

Bowe is 13th in rec, 14th in yards, and 37th in TD's...

Would you take Welker over Bowe? **** no.

But Welker is 1st in rec, 1st in yards, T-5th in TD's... Why? Because he has a NFL QB throwing to him.
Your argument is full of fail. Wes Welker is a fukn midget. NE throws the ball 40-50 times a game. Chiefs run the bull up Wiegmans ass 20-30 times a game. Impact WR's don't grow on trees. I would trade JC in a heartbeat before D-Bowe. RB's are a dime a dozen. Top ten wr's aren't.

jd1020 12-07-2011 08:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianfo (Post 8179294)
Your argument is full of fail. Wes Welker is a fukn midget. NE throws the ball 40-50 times a game. Chiefs run the bull up Wiegmans ass 20-30 times a game. Impact WR's don't grow on trees. I would trade JC in a heartbeat before D-Bowe. RB's are a dime a dozen. Top ten wr's aren't.
JC just tore his ACL. Good luck getting much value for him right now.

Chiefs run the ball because their passing attack sucks complete ass.

O.city 12-07-2011 08:22 PM
Well I'd trade Bowe if I had too but would prefer not too. At this point whatever it takes to get your qb should be done probably.

Reerun_KC 12-07-2011 08:28 PM
NOT a God damn thing...

Buehler445 12-07-2011 08:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8179095)
Easy Sparky
You haven't had to deal with the douchewater WRs we've had to. And this guy wants to trade the one we've got.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8179097)
You just said it right there...

Bowe needs a QB.

How much impact did Bowe have in the playoffs against the Ravens? 0 catches.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8179109)
It is simple. QB > WR. Doesn't get much simpler than that.

How do you think Steve Smith would be doing if Carolina didn't draft Cam Newton? He was considered washed up.
DUDE. It's not one or the other. If you go throw a rook out there with scrubs he will FAIL.

jd1020 12-07-2011 08:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 8179334)
You haven't had to deal with the douchewater WRs we've had to. And this guy wants to trade the one we've got.





DUDE. It's not one or the other. If you go throw a rook out there with scrubs he will FAIL.
Ya... Breaston, Baldwin, and Moeaki are scrubs. :rolleyes:

O.city 12-07-2011 08:32 PM
Say Stafford went down and the Lions were wanting to trade up and get Luck. Would you trade Megatron to get him?

Reerun_KC 12-07-2011 08:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8179338)
Ya... Breaston, Baldwin, and Moeaki are scrubs. :rolleyes:
Probably not, but they can drop the ball with the best of them...

jd1020 12-07-2011 08:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8179341)
Say Stafford went down and the Lions were wanting to trade up and get Luck. Would you trade Megatron to get him?
Why would Detroit want to trade up for a QB when they have Stafford?

O.city 12-07-2011 08:33 PM
While I tend to agree with jd on this, I'd like to ask what elite qb in the league right now is throwing to "scrubs"?

O.city 12-07-2011 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8179345)
Why would Detroit want to trade up for a QB when they have Stafford?
I said say Stafford went down. Say a neck injury or something he likely couldn't come back from.

whoman69 12-07-2011 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8179287)
You know whats consistent with all those teams? They already had a ****ing QB.
Did any of them trade a star WR to get that QB?

Buehler445 12-07-2011 08:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8179338)
Ya... Breaston, Baldwin, and Moeaki are scrubs. :rolleyes:
Baldwin has done nothing to show that he is a number one. Breaston is a slot guy.

These guys aren't bad but it's absurd to trade away the best target your new QB has to throw to.

jd1020 12-07-2011 08:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 8179350)
Did any of them trade a star WR to get that QB?
God your arguments are terrible.

Were any of them in a position to need to trade to get a QB?

Indy? Nope. They had the #1 pick.

NE? Nope. They had Bledsoe.

GB? Nope. They had Favre.

NO? Nope. They signed Brees through FA.

EDIT: Had to look back at the teams you were talking about just to make sure...

ATL? Nope. They had the #3 pick.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:53 PM.
Page 4 of 10 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.