DJ's left nut |
04-25-2012 11:05 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can
(Post 8564934)
i haven't seen a report that says he is a dominant run blocker, and their offense wasn't geared for it anyways...
i have no ****ing idea what people think Albert can't do...he was damn good last year with shitty QBs and shitty RBs...
people have wanted to get rid of him since the minute he arrived, it's jsut ****ing wierd...he's good and good enough
|
I've always been very pro-Albert. I think he's probably right around the 10-12 range as a LT.
He struggles with speed rushers because he his feet are only adequate. Because of that he also has to cheat a little bit to the outside and can get knocked a bit off balance with an inside swim/hump move.
I think he's a good LT. But I think Kalil can be a great one. And frankly, we have no idea what Albert will cost as a FA and if we can afford to keep him. If we end up in a situation with Albert/Bowe like we were in with Carr/Bowe this year and can only tag one of them - we're in a pretty damn tough spot, aren't we?
I'm not eager to get rid of him. I've never been one to slam him either. But in the end if Kalil were to fall, the value there would be otherwordly and you'd have a chance to upgrade on him. Why not?
But here's a true 'fact' for Dave: Kalil will not make it to 11. The Rams would be insane to pass on him. Hell, the Jags would be stupid to do so. And ultimately I think someone would trade up as soon as he starts slipping, if he even starts slipping. I still think the Vikings will take him at 3.
|